From nobody Sun Feb 8 13:10:26 2026 Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch (mail-4322.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5226E1F0E51 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 2025 13:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743773726; cv=none; b=qPTZsT3D7jT0d7K7QzOeakK0u1T0NHtESoxC71emn76zwdA0H5lG/gBoFc221DleZoZtZ2QCbkriyDffkmBSetmKpp/tQyFSg+MQxROjmnG13SvEZ/YyA3dyUKih1CAbk6ev5ot4N1/DiEYsz1zMf9XLWpcFmoGB6EDzDiEIMPE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743773726; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iSPqErZxC4LadBJfw/bHoBjcJYWzig0oMNRs5w/4daA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BBYh4NQzPZ8YAdDMmnvmLWHeuRnH8/ys6ww4WyfDfsUCdBXnetGHwgS903aHFSHCekljLobOJ/BYelaDQ6On7NVA6PLKfgc27kecx2QuvoBOVEZiJG65HXxM0x4g8xVp4hwyS1Fjyf6BOn0Sv64D0YX3MNhY87Z0NJBo+cdpNtE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=Sa45lJWz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.22 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="Sa45lJWz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1743773716; x=1744032916; bh=iSPqErZxC4LadBJfw/bHoBjcJYWzig0oMNRs5w/4daA=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector: List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=Sa45lJWz/EQuYqoeQSPIKNAq2n/Bx3vI4xmmSObtiUb5OZgezFvnmJJyaVNEjBDxY GVCaWaypX0eSfqs3eLX/Q2dQhDdoZLBsNxeCZDDyJ+rHFkAVbek+nnL46rYLotomHN QrQn5wXpHikX0qp4fOIx+yPdbEYsLeKF7kvarABgVsNFvCe20VLnlqvpH8Sw5XFGoH PiRfS4ClrukL8Bd8+3hhoFXYzn8L0beZPDEbR0if2q/f694ePobWYuLRwN6agcCqyS C92T3vKGY0h6Nr8BktmNl/s0Z7ue+EFy91wILjvbc8nB9ke/nBq6AntloZEJ6c6WHs Xtifi/Zef4c6Q== Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2025 13:35:11 +0000 To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org From: Bryant Boatright Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] Staging: rtl8723bs: Fix unbalanced braces in conditional Message-ID: Feedback-ID: 74848953:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 12c1f626f44bc9f7b326b4fee82961bcbc9f9555 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Only one branch of conditional statement is a single statement thus both branches should use braces to adhere to the Linux coding style. Reported by checkpatch: CHECK: Unbalanced braces around else statement Signed-off-by: Bryant Boatright --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl= 8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c index 64ce33c6fba1..5fd635a4c632 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c @@ -273,9 +273,9 @@ struct cmd_obj *_rtw_dequeue_cmd(struct __queue *queue) =20 /* spin_lock_bh(&(queue->lock)); */ spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, irqL); - if (list_empty(&queue->queue)) + if (list_empty(&queue->queue)) { obj =3D NULL; - else { + } else { obj =3D container_of(get_next(&queue->queue), struct cmd_obj, list); list_del_init(&obj->list); } --=20 2.43.0