From nobody Wed Dec 17 00:04:43 2025 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE94C10F07 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 15:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232596AbjLJPZ7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:25:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232822AbjLJPZz (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Dec 2023 10:25:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F251C4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 07:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40b36e721fcso7374855e9.0 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 07:26:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1702221960; x=1702826760; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1HxTpgRZMqUaasDK2SQoows7vTW70XnRViyUroMPu9U=; b=njlxZ3SVKMNr1PdGKRq/wNtb7vSLaJi3Nnj53UeSUVtse+LfNEI6Vxk0o5CTD8imtK aeLuHEOvi1GxsKG+upcscV6q2oHdR2Jl2oOPQDC8nxo2u3UDh6FR2WXD1n8yCJDPDa7b p+SGSee5JblKivTt7/1Jihs6qCEgPQtkfPLCqPwdLb/FLkFnrumjhBJqAP6r1d1ERHu1 qiY6vraehAgz8hhKsOLR8OyCzqMBMca8uxtq96bMvxf0TFxF2KVla3Mbchms0dsqmfpJ 929hRwQpvQ66BMpZKtc8/ZK+lMZCXJkM3CRTmXUIZgLDvq9e4dfGzJqq+9zEsBNrOX46 jFTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1702221960; x=1702826760; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=1HxTpgRZMqUaasDK2SQoows7vTW70XnRViyUroMPu9U=; b=pTJPD/xpLw4zbY3q7I8TmMnjRsGgQ1/RoXr8Xe4iLT2uSQ/8lFdGp4sh1I473q+s4S zsVc6WYd6n3osqWWwR2nDwT/hEASSruBCCDytyXYuNRav7P1nrsk0bAXQpCJOSkEFLM3 9f1F88oFhBpxz5ANZDocDQ5dlf0Tb2pyXIdWRW2DKxGcAJMjfT+UKqgmLOxDb/18xag+ PaPMnw7UgV+i63oj7cB2b3ePSnmrMss2oDqKzeVYBmjbU12y6SKNSeuZDPkKOdJ6RTqS fpMCe5PIpnbkcxa3dVUQfhYY/BZDVeJPa1EjYVDWv8dggjcQg+4rY8BtMh41uSK7+GOD 6pxw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYuhNDEo8STBy0op3LHJC9kZLWHdYK8fG3fSbKmt04SW7GnmH4 00s8LJh4KGkyyWq6UkZnlvU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH4EzRkwgg/9IU6xxKsto+E6fiddXvXCHiduD7imzBv3zqTn9K+VLHLteQrHMEJX5aVf67cYg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:511a:b0:40b:516a:3856 with SMTP id o26-20020a05600c511a00b0040b516a3856mr4029610wms.1.1702221959852; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 07:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from matrix-ESPRIMO-P710 (p54a07fa0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [84.160.127.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fc17-20020a05600c525100b0040c42681fcesm3080228wmb.15.2023.12.10.07.25.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Dec 2023 07:25:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 16:25:58 +0100 From: Philipp Hortmann To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 01/10] staging: rtl8192e: Remove unused struct iw_range_with_scan_capa Message-ID: <8b4532b8739ca0baa9fa7c736dab68130510ffe8.1702212003.git.philipp.g.hortmann@gmail.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Remove unused struct iw_range_with_scan_capa. Signed-off-by: Philipp Hortmann --- drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c | 22 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c b/drivers/staging/r= tl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c index 4371ab1239ee..4c884c5277f9 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl8192e/rtl_wx.c @@ -158,28 +158,6 @@ static int _rtl92e_wx_set_mode(struct net_device *dev, return ret; } =20 -struct iw_range_with_scan_capa { - /* Informative stuff (to choose between different interface) */ - __u32 throughput; /* To give an idea... */ - /* In theory this value should be the maximum benchmarked - * TCP/IP throughput, because with most of these devices the - * bit rate is meaningless (overhead an co) to estimate how - * fast the connection will go and pick the fastest one. - * I suggest people to play with Netperf or any benchmark... - */ - - /* NWID (or domain id) */ - __u32 min_nwid; /* Minimal NWID we are able to set */ - __u32 max_nwid; /* Maximal NWID we are able to set */ - - /* Old Frequency (backward compat - moved lower ) */ - __u16 old_num_channels; - __u8 old_num_frequency; - - /* Scan capabilities */ - __u8 scan_capa; -}; - static int _rtl92e_wx_get_range(struct net_device *dev, struct iw_request_info *info, union iwreq_data *wrqu, char *extra) --=20 2.43.0