From nobody Wed Feb 11 06:30:50 2026 Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E23C91AD3E5 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.131 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720092322; cv=none; b=AQa7/aKmaT/NkfNL05kSJLZHqbJjlukELun24dgWjrxNKTVg9SBdiu5h7Mc7jkannzB+ubVs0evXCQSgnQxwkFt07A2mcwWD8o0mFS38wmL9rA/tU3ZhW7r/A+3TPN43WtarSW11CqaFlYTeTBz0tkjX4Hrh1XAyfwIF1bqpSgA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720092322; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ExZ/jWRz3JNp2OD5lRM7K74HdX5ErPggTIbY4d/k8H8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=s4Y9Z4vEO2BmpcXPQLEQjhDjRRLr71hbsQdGaZNUWW3BwEnSektsm4jrKpNsfYM//Uby9o9mbIwwIKHhsYarUjd2Ntu+pJ5TF3cnDe9ossP8XH3i2jWheiffjZrUAOaF0+t1xNMkqvTyOE9+REkQ+j8KwekUmsEune+iLVtsDA0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=IrS06H/i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.131 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="IrS06H/i" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1720092318; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=8wAGNXuI1qwPyzOykQd8DO+mgTfhYkp9bBwCtZr1ZS0=; b=IrS06H/iF5itsGarec0zMq66fvnKviknZOMpv4ixZNbFt+hT1k9Mc9heQNTieGwAT6uEDaE9DleKwhrlRIZNQasOBa/b1G+gd51Bt9fmVKlEyY3ZLachUipr7SzDEYDAZuCRw/laQw7Joig4PDNedgwDF+tgO1GmOJb2ZH38SYg= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R111e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033023225041;MF=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=17;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W9qWV5z_1720092316; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W9qWV5z_1720092316) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 19:25:17 +0800 From: Baolin Wang To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hughd@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, chrisl@kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, 21cnbao@gmail.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com, shy828301@gmail.com, ziy@nvidia.com, ioworker0@gmail.com, da.gomez@samsung.com, p.raghav@samsung.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v3 09/10] mm: shmem: split large entry if the swapin folio is not large Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 19:24:58 +0800 Message-Id: <7d831561b1daa14234c409cb1677a367d3ce5e0b.1720079976.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Now the swap device can only swap-in order 0 folio, even though a large folio is swapped out. This requires us to split the large entry previously saved in the shmem pagecache to support the swap in of small folios. Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang --- mm/shmem.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c index eb030827f7fb..b4468076f0e9 100644 --- a/mm/shmem.c +++ b/mm/shmem.c @@ -1990,6 +1990,82 @@ static void shmem_set_folio_swapin_error(struct inod= e *inode, pgoff_t index, swap_free_nr(swap, nr_pages); } =20 +static int shmem_split_large_entry(struct inode *inode, pgoff_t index, + swp_entry_t swap, int new_order, gfp_t gfp) +{ + struct address_space *mapping =3D inode->i_mapping; + XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index, new_order); + void *alloced_shadow =3D NULL; + int alloced_order =3D 0, i; + + for (;;) { + int order =3D -1, split_order =3D 0; + void *old =3D NULL; + + xas_lock_irq(&xas); + old =3D xas_load(&xas); + if (!xa_is_value(old) || swp_to_radix_entry(swap) !=3D old) { + xas_set_err(&xas, -EEXIST); + goto unlock; + } + + if (order =3D=3D -1) + order =3D xas_get_order(&xas); + + /* Swap entry may have changed before we re-acquire the lock */ + if (alloced_order && + (old !=3D alloced_shadow || order !=3D alloced_order)) { + xas_destroy(&xas); + alloced_order =3D 0; + } + + /* Try to split large swap entry in pagecache */ + if (order > 0 && order > new_order) { + if (!alloced_order) { + split_order =3D order; + goto unlock; + } + xas_split(&xas, old, order); + + /* + * Re-set the swap entry after splitting, and the swap + * offset of the original large entry must be continuous. + */ + for (i =3D 0; i < 1 << order; i +=3D (1 << new_order)) { + pgoff_t aligned_index =3D round_down(index, 1 << order); + swp_entry_t tmp; + + tmp =3D swp_entry(swp_type(swap), swp_offset(swap) + i); + __xa_store(&mapping->i_pages, aligned_index + i, + swp_to_radix_entry(tmp), 0); + } + } + +unlock: + xas_unlock_irq(&xas); + + /* split needed, alloc here and retry. */ + if (split_order) { + xas_split_alloc(&xas, old, split_order, gfp); + if (xas_error(&xas)) + goto error; + alloced_shadow =3D old; + alloced_order =3D split_order; + xas_reset(&xas); + continue; + } + + if (!xas_nomem(&xas, gfp)) + break; + } + +error: + if (xas_error(&xas)) + return xas_error(&xas); + + return alloced_order; +} + /* * Swap in the folio pointed to by *foliop. * Caller has to make sure that *foliop contains a valid swapped folio. @@ -2026,12 +2102,31 @@ static int shmem_swapin_folio(struct inode *inode, = pgoff_t index, /* Look it up and read it in.. */ folio =3D swap_cache_get_folio(swap, NULL, 0); if (!folio) { + int split_order, offset; + /* Or update major stats only when swapin succeeds?? */ if (fault_type) { *fault_type |=3D VM_FAULT_MAJOR; count_vm_event(PGMAJFAULT); count_memcg_event_mm(fault_mm, PGMAJFAULT); } + + /* + * Now swap device can only swap in order 0 folio, then we + * should split the large swap entry stored in the pagecache + * if necessary. + */ + split_order =3D shmem_split_large_entry(inode, index, swap, 0, gfp); + if (split_order < 0) { + error =3D split_order; + goto failed; + } + + if (split_order > 0) { + offset =3D index - round_down(index, 1 << split_order); + swap =3D swp_entry(swp_type(swap), swp_offset(swap) + offset); + } + /* Here we actually start the io */ folio =3D shmem_swapin_cluster(swap, gfp, info, index); if (!folio) { --=20 2.39.3