From nobody Sat Nov 30 04:41:16 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D37156F3C; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 18:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726164295; cv=none; b=CnwQxg0uAIgrV985uXhgrKS+hzu3GVJmD9K0FCMo/os+y0TiKBTNIMWcsSP7aXCSAYDNcrnYR/0jFxVRP3AET4vk6667scoPCmg6wCEoCb8fhEs9RmczGWCW1uINCzEkrMYab87Nc2HFqauBOtb5cNb/IMpucs+hYigDADXYvn0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726164295; c=relaxed/simple; bh=m2qKIKBMD3l9202rvhFx78CKdiRjtOAEI4d8wLS4i18=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TPjPhlf+MUUbFVxfsBxLBgrF0GtvhUsF8swox5V7uEiME+KqBlMwwmIODvvNnzfzMW9NetrzcTh8T6kGBn+J37RWjcBz7ieqTIlr66i0zeFiG0Wsa5Mjj7AKAGjPoAWBEGm5q9Vl81BLd0X7WuvnIctWnEBIcEODh6PSpMVLFQI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=W5ASdFiP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="W5ASdFiP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1726164294; x=1757700294; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m2qKIKBMD3l9202rvhFx78CKdiRjtOAEI4d8wLS4i18=; b=W5ASdFiPewX52681fs6y71DwuJPF0h8l2zERSrAURxxGH13hjQfW6zzc 9HnRZ+9HDxX28rT80ujHFw6XyEvjQt+deYvwGqdy+7RurHjfjCofZTmbo ctuSl34rHGpXRDCZDEXPkgefewo+bHEINj9ywGSfOepRFHTzMhWr61P9w RK0OdvYLBib7vLQXxlhkOIaeRCo8ODqSseU2hI8dQSPBBKMlUABQ9TpJX ht7z30gF/d9HGBRwHWDiuA5FIFOI4v6tiRJjVJzjuNzajdivqLf/ADVr5 ivPrcEfuSwLg4zG6UPWSUsHv00LsOZCKlfFuTmggNAE8c8jG+0EV6XVxG g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: EadLacyKSWKthoEbQ93sfA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /W/pyhUHQJWjkX40/SfizA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11193"; a="24976573" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,223,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="24976573" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2024 11:04:52 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4q2vUEAyQS+AvNPmQMA6wQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5GZXJH80RGKjy/ekPAHHBQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,223,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="67724600" Received: from b04f130c85c0.jf.intel.com (HELO rchatre-desk1.jf.intel.com) ([10.165.154.99]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Sep 2024 11:04:52 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: fenghua.yu@intel.com, shuah@kernel.org, tony.luck@intel.com, peternewman@google.com, babu.moger@amd.com, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Cc: maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V2 01/13] selftests/resctrl: Make functions only used in same file static Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 11:13:50 -0700 Message-ID: <551f786b1df77ef2f4e25d1448dea4c6e62a2f72.1726164080.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Fix following sparse warnings: tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:47:6: warning: symbol 'membw= _initialize_perf_event_attr' was not declared. Should it be static? tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:64:6: warning: symbol 'membw= _ioctl_perf_event_ioc_reset_enable' was not declared. Should it be static? tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:70:6: warning: symbol 'membw= _ioctl_perf_event_ioc_disable' was not declared. Should it be static? tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c:81:6: warning: symbol 'get_e= vent_and_umask' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre Reviewed-by: Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen --- Changes since v1: - Add Ilpo's Reviewed-by tag. - Let subject describe the change, not the tool that found it. (checkpatch.= pl) --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c b/tools/testing/= selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c index 8c275f6b4dd7..70e8e31f5d1a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/resctrl_val.c @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int imcs; static struct imc_counter_config imc_counters_config[MAX_IMCS][2]; static const struct resctrl_test *current_test; =20 -void membw_initialize_perf_event_attr(int i, int j) +static void membw_initialize_perf_event_attr(int i, int j) { memset(&imc_counters_config[i][j].pe, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr)); @@ -61,13 +61,13 @@ void membw_initialize_perf_event_attr(int i, int j) PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED | PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING; } =20 -void membw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_reset_enable(int i, int j) +static void membw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_reset_enable(int i, int j) { ioctl(imc_counters_config[i][j].fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_RESET, 0); ioctl(imc_counters_config[i][j].fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_ENABLE, 0); } =20 -void membw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_disable(int i, int j) +static void membw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_disable(int i, int j) { ioctl(imc_counters_config[i][j].fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0); } @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ void membw_ioctl_perf_event_ioc_disable(int i, int j) * @count: iMC number * @op: Operation (read/write) */ -void get_event_and_umask(char *cas_count_cfg, int count, bool op) +static void get_event_and_umask(char *cas_count_cfg, int count, bool op) { char *token[MAX_TOKENS]; int i =3D 0; --=20 2.46.0