From nobody Thu Apr 9 15:03:41 2026 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E5B63AB29E for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775577757; cv=none; b=EPE9A+52liJxVWKwOEm60YQuItAue3oTAokAfCgAjiHQR5rbHrKGuTArv3+qaydFUjIwO43s6iNIo52nNSE2C8MAZhuWScIAa+tquJ4oun0H4Ku65fTKL8+WJLZzO3hmSB9eB0XAsiyZXmVhwzSDzlPjPhAUK/wT9wiwgZem7M8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775577757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Yv5EcUWXDpIZAFAX7DJdvguRmY2SyKl2ADW+bcIYyWk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=kxxDYtB2JZKT2lTwPblnKrZp7IVA6hfw8WIaDEqfS3yRiaUw9zQtJNF9U3XXOIY2Jf04CGed1vGjvT/nzCKjoYXYb0+DivnUV4NWxIJM/HAYeipd7GYtrq/D4r3mjadmaOTpb53KVHSBBTzCNNl7QPLSwOxPeT0Hg/KP91gthSQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cvY4YyYZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cvY4YyYZ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1775577752; x=1807113752; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Yv5EcUWXDpIZAFAX7DJdvguRmY2SyKl2ADW+bcIYyWk=; b=cvY4YyYZYJ0T8bhV9PJuMb+MSRbcISeymYjIP+nj89/9DAmlRr6Fz3QL IZOczq6TrRH/tFfyrLkFctsWfebnJx/RHGYdOISoy2Ms4mWmldMFPDpeL JZoimtzvJV1qE0L5b2t7pNVIkCjPLyi2YDAuqTx7W/OL4C2WlTmTdd87I eEQECcwwlfgyeYkzljBuv7kEJPxKisLq7kKUkSQbm7aD2Xzqr5yrOmVVz P7MS44Pbsr7nfmXOAgLDU/e/32dCWUQsV6/xl1PJ18kmOppM9+bJuzJFb gsBkNNjEO4LMDWDFh0Tku+Pm7W0z4rTiKF1kQnnTSonDvo+Th2CxB596z Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YqVb3rhhQkemU7WtONiQuA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: YkzFrUKbRpuSC/7Z7sOZKw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11752"; a="80432630" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,165,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="80432630" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Apr 2026 09:02:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HYEMzCy7QbG62lW+ayVb3Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1owjR8IHQA2H3+ijhLJfdQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,165,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="228119031" Received: from rchatre-desk1.jf.intel.com ([10.165.154.99]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Apr 2026 09:02:18 -0700 From: Reinette Chatre To: tony.luck@intel.com, james.morse@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com, bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, ben.horgan@arm.com, fustini@kernel.org, fenghuay@nvidia.com, peternewman@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, reinette.chatre@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v3 01/13] MAINTAINERS: Update resctrl entry Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 09:01:58 -0700 Message-ID: <4c14dd82e81737c6413e10fe097475b1cc0886fc.1775576382.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The x86 maintainers handle the resctrl filesystem and x86 architectural resctrl code. Even so, the x86 maintainers are not part of the resctrl section and not returned when scripts/get_maintainer.pl is run on resctrl filesystem code. With patches flowing via x86 maintainers resctrl should also ensure it follows the tip rules. Add the x86 maintainer alias, x86@kernel.org, to the resctrl section to ensure x86 maintainers are included in associated resctrl submissions. Add a reference to the tip tree handbook to make it clear which rules resctrl follows. Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre --- Changes since v1: - Add reference to tip tree handbook to follow similar change to other tip subsystems: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260305212215.3188399-1-dave.hansen@linux.in= tel.com/ --- MAINTAINERS | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index c14718adb2d8..ee218defa5f5 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -22157,11 +22157,13 @@ F: tools/testing/selftests/net/rds/ RDT - RESOURCE ALLOCATION M: Tony Luck M: Reinette Chatre +M: x86@kernel.org R: Dave Martin R: James Morse R: Babu Moger L: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org S: Supported +P: Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst F: Documentation/filesystems/resctrl.rst F: arch/x86/include/asm/resctrl.h F: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/ --=20 2.50.1