From nobody Wed Feb 11 12:08:33 2026 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com (mail-pl1-f201.google.com [209.85.214.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32F0C1FA14E for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 02:18:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737771504; cv=none; b=MskUG+Kw4OdLLlJWaLbCEntXPukHPUhipX9H/7X2DtAO4/sHI9TtW/7x8PnRbO3hM1ijJzSyHdqztiPyecF1to29+SC+CVICc0vf8MDM4DkFYRnPjGXPMxIm8SzGUy9Uh4MuQrdKx07OGLRs5Utt3YYoaQ31LNwjW9pRo5Ih+NY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737771504; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kFoFaLQFjmnNAe/PdLNntt6jCeH0z3LN13BfMuDLEkU=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=Uj1R9K6C25pLmsVDH9w3l9p0276VNYNgnFO3mJyDyY1KF3n/3UXvnMHxVVItxbbFhdS8Cvtb0UHnbyYrqiMLJPDugRlQxLccrsdQV1XfuF4BzP59EjsThjvCaZKHVIsY0WC+sjB3U3wefs8xSw1A9YoPD8mgg/q02Vlv8YbrK0c= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--yepeilin.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=cIHEkyye; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--yepeilin.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="cIHEkyye" Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2164fad3792so44524375ad.0 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:18:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1737771502; x=1738376302; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GIRUjVUPGvvoC/G+tLqvrHi6mwo3DeIvXXHsctD0qOI=; b=cIHEkyye7hfKFZNAZhsppHzcT4WQD7QF5cBZ9HBHiE0a16w/PAwHCYD7towPwZWCUB NIwf6EqQMU8J0Ndr+n4qnLAAKwNfgQzP7fLWg5JmSZLunGDNRr463ObHmuUSnBN2Qxe9 GFkDjY+dTkuRTDBFZLQpZrQpVAxHwZVJDvbwDkR/5lXvV5hCsOg6yAsYtWMX+A83XOJg 1a4/Cj4E+s07y59D/OAZVza/O5adoYhfl+R+i8pTz/bjr+rtxvAVT5d5P8kwmrqDHTxD nqLnlGVcVBNrptxQDE5mxMei/L3MxPqtdJx7A8InyTlYkHAtzdqdFYk1VEyhvDSoct+C BkOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1737771502; x=1738376302; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GIRUjVUPGvvoC/G+tLqvrHi6mwo3DeIvXXHsctD0qOI=; b=uh8YdWG47ydhQipdtSHNljWYYbq+ZHoAknRYxqq0lCcxQ1gbQwjYULPcXOA+iAJRYL /iUavKY3fp1L+oTpPfmvQs+z+4yTnxxnt9rWL1pP/oTA7vZuKUiKO0JX7fTMu64xacF5 afuVeiQmN/wQzBMtinN1eyfSuqywEDU3TizplE9hiZF9zqVti9NvCEwlNBkIdRFcmxfn FZksIYrYmVQmaKTIFRzfh97lMm5C2w+1PAmg29ABYMh9zsIg1dVK3hINS7hKh41ROCb1 /b4XdjpT0F/QmgsnRjIw68/8cx26R0h0KZiGE38G8EgZp5LCsMFWDSiYksS/ODstloNI 223A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWwV698Rgf7424IBvwr8qQYfs+6Zw8z40MUZ3+zaj+PibVdwjVChV7AmSN6kKoSxJjy8Jj5q0lS6MMqghI=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YykardzOiuNLgMCmh+2wh0g/6CDLrvB8eNTGb0sccQQOixZxg1l jKnEwJduCnvy+bgJ1ZR4EwAzeYqaBv5uw08aM6wax2uuallS8Gp/jpD4oQjDT1ySJmnOlY4iOf8 S1erSzLcVCg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHg0VQQH90pQuEfyGGIfiVpVl5OiI/iOGIaKUaWYcp8ziT8hehv5mLQYN4xTkvy2RPykSchBVyc1gr7cw== X-Received: from plxd18.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:902:ef12:b0:216:5566:3c11]) (user=yepeilin job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:902:e751:b0:215:9d29:9724 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-21c355c6146mr550619555ad.38.1737771502432; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 18:18:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 02:18:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog Message-ID: <4831a11659532873c20f0c693c248e5cefaddcbf.1737763916.git.yepeilin@google.com> Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_atomic_rmw() From: Peilin Ye To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Peilin Ye , bpf@ietf.org, Xu Kuohai , Eduard Zingerman , David Vernet , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Jonathan Corbet , "Paul E. McKenney" , Puranjay Mohan , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Quentin Monnet , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , Josh Don , Barret Rhoden , Neel Natu , Benjamin Segall , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Currently, check_atomic() only handles atomic read-modify-write (RMW) instructions. Since we are planning to introduce other types of atomic instructions (i.e., atomic load/store), extract the existing RMW handling logic into its own function named check_atomic_rmw(). Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 0935b72fe716..2b3caa7549af 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -7536,28 +7536,12 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env= *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn static int save_aux_ptr_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_ty= pe type, bool allow_trust_mismatch); =20 -static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct= bpf_insn *insn) +static int check_atomic_rmw(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, + struct bpf_insn *insn) { int load_reg; int err; =20 - switch (insn->imm) { - case BPF_ADD: - case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: - case BPF_AND: - case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH: - case BPF_OR: - case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH: - case BPF_XOR: - case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: - case BPF_XCHG: - case BPF_CMPXCHG: - break; - default: - verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm); - return -EINVAL; - } - if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) !=3D BPF_W && BPF_SIZE(insn->code) !=3D BPF_DW) { verbose(env, "invalid atomic operand size\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -7641,6 +7625,26 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env= , int insn_idx, struct bpf_i return 0; } =20 +static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct= bpf_insn *insn) +{ + switch (insn->imm) { + case BPF_ADD: + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: + case BPF_AND: + case BPF_AND | BPF_FETCH: + case BPF_OR: + case BPF_OR | BPF_FETCH: + case BPF_XOR: + case BPF_XOR | BPF_FETCH: + case BPF_XCHG: + case BPF_CMPXCHG: + return check_atomic_rmw(env, insn_idx, insn); + default: + verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm); + return -EINVAL; + } +} + /* When register 'regno' is used to read the stack (either directly or thr= ough * a helper function) make sure that it's within stack boundary and, depen= ding * on the access type and privileges, that all elements of the stack are --=20 2.48.1.262.g85cc9f2d1e-goog