From nobody Sat Sep 26 13:47:20 2026 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 311D937F8A4; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 20:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788206677; cv=none; b=RYS0AKT00B5PfM5CSzN3TL6cCRuhcWTuigIduNhVThwEwkXli3p4Haudd0G14+XdQIvQUcBPCGqNT+TltnqjY3pc1FoMg+AKS0j6MxeD9840wpf7pCMRyr14SubjMl1wHTLRXlRM/gv+Qf0VHFMy4B53Sq13XPvtRnPPs2r3fHo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788206677; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jpApC1IxYyJ3IXDLLBdUpoiJFdbpvib33Hdf9mWwb8Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ovo2jCtui7btNMPGr1vYQroj6okDjJvEG8sSaq/ACgiyvxUiVJm80S+WQ6x/3kynONCBf4MAqgptJpM32v+plmmADutxGTM/84iwvQTHZPeaUQJlZ6Zz45I0ICOSS0qhEBw1OYHZ4T1fBpCm7SRxI2/Mchu442P+DGsDo/uD938= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=YdxxeWOU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="YdxxeWOU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 742981F000E9; Mon, 31 Aug 2026 20:04:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788206676; bh=BdSyXpjN1Pdbc/0U7bLGPgVv4WZN/quYZIsZ/oJCZZA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date; b=YdxxeWOUZK7HEN3g/9vSHP/2w2Jbs01C9aVMTR0XFAlY7JMqQIOYGxeT93Z4xScF2 g4NzN6WoOYikV7bGpr+9JUNjQQKv7bsjvyO4seiu2mBurNNozMXY9FymyCjFao4bIF eoVB/CGbb/uEN0VMKGwsr6D/GxzhfOhY5NMBX5XO4k0kHHLGxkez2FCHIqnyO1F7gK gQVZs+oZIOXHv69jyzPyQdj+LjdWCdq3is86IFPCGnjYdeOVYFwoimzC2UkIig8OQT Ob0QuJY6HPHClpg8AU6584KXJvWdsMPSdD2sNzQ5edDF18PFz9sBzDLCjikhtoL7eg V2i6Zgkf6QtLA== From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: LKML Subject: [PATCH v1] ACPI: scan: Drop useless and noisy debug statement Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 22:04:32 +0200 Message-ID: <2861358.mvXUDI8C0e@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Linux Kernel Development - Intel Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" The debug message printing statement in handle_to_device() is super-noisy because it triggers whenever the presence of an attached struct acpi_device is checked for the given object in the ACPI namespace and it turns out that there is none. That is a perfectly valid situation and the lack of an attached struct acpi_device is not particularly interesting, so drop that message. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/scan.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c @@ -639,10 +639,9 @@ static struct acpi_device *handle_to_dev =20 status =3D acpi_get_data_full(handle, acpi_scan_drop_device, (void **)&adev, callback); - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !adev) { - acpi_handle_debug(handle, "No context!\n"); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !adev) return NULL; - } + return adev; }