From nobody Fri Oct 3 07:40:42 2025 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DFD30ACEC; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:59:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756911592; cv=none; b=PY/10Iv2HUXNJIKCVaYsva457nz74WXecu0W4LkgN9PuF8W4lBzpGM2jmtPAVfIAJ8JCCs5Z+xm55CG1llfhxBqIrzwTMeYJHevb+0xYnALEkKSEuQHxbzJq8NowUE62uZFJpMnZ4bRjGjveiYBmelhsVYw/1nTYkpVwwM7f9oU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756911592; c=relaxed/simple; bh=txSRCShFHr3LUVNgVFtikONwwhg9swIbp+KxsjlKvho=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oHy9XEj6oDMA3yOE2CGtW0NWXl3D2QhCft1hHJFz0scpEA40FK3rSwOU7RhpU0wL0IYs4IUzzrf3eoqhAHY1dvqV8lzcLLcg/0J9otCFnr4Ym84rVUwDdPpvn0l13KOszpuLMs2UEqzvRxw7OFbliKZlapZnGx/LAsD9M1cOZg4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OR6MKdFg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OR6MKdFg" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A90BC4CEE7; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 14:59:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1756911592; bh=txSRCShFHr3LUVNgVFtikONwwhg9swIbp+KxsjlKvho=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=OR6MKdFgW5sovt5WrAlfdSX69XVFGuWoYxAtbLoHtZVJOo6/2iWBgvGB9nqQuP1WO qtO0kFLtav+DYQ7dHvvdBPfzhIjOqulQnFmOLehQGhkE0fdPPf0DIgBH/WNuXC6PU3 +vlFRjVpxNH6HKtmxs7m++P+tC++LlmrQpoZSTqO1jNO5I8HmViMGW+lKWnQvULDiZ ZRv+P3f7V13YPtvwLlbYNt+GplAVue/3UKyL3GnoPlEgli+2DXF9mpOank5ZAws28t I/MJfoG4peFEzf5emAdJFGN3KSkFPsBWcwXC3Li7McBq/yvq4nDs2bv5Txvzjcuf1X aZaier/RyGSoQ== From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux PM Cc: LKML , Viresh Kumar , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Zihuan Zhang , Srinivas Pandruvada Subject: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free() Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 16:59:47 +0200 Message-ID: <2251447.irdbgypaU6@rafael.j.wysocki> Organization: Linux Kernel Development Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Rafael J. Wysocki Follow cleanup.h recommendations and define and assign a variable in one statement when __free() is used. No intentional functional impact. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Reviewed-by:=C2=A0 =C2=A0Zihuan Zhang --- Zhang, I said the code structure here was intentional, but that was before the cleanup.h recommendation was pointed out to me. --- drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c @@ -1502,9 +1502,7 @@ static void __intel_pstate_update_max_fr =20 static bool intel_pstate_update_max_freq(struct cpudata *cpudata) { - struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy); - - policy =3D cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu); + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) =3D cpufreq_cpu_= get(cpudata->cpu); if (!policy) return false;