Use flush_work() instead of cancel_work_sync() to terminate pending IRQ
work in cs35l56_sdw_remove(). And flush_work() again after masking the
interrupts to flush any queueing that was racing with the masking. This is
the same sequence as cs35l56_sdw_system_suspend().

cs35l56_sdw_interrupt() takes the pm_runtime to prevent the bus powering-
down before the interrupt status can be read and handled. The work releases
this pm_runtime. So cancelling it, instead of flushing, could leave an
unbalanced pm_runtime.

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Fixes: e49611252900 ("ASoC: cs35l56: Add driver for Cirrus Logic CS35L56")
---
 sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-sdw.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-sdw.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-sdw.c
index d2b82a846ae8..c21568f57c63 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-sdw.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-sdw.c
@@ -544,10 +544,11 @@ static void cs35l56_sdw_remove(struct sdw_slave *peripheral)
 
 	/* Disable SoundWire interrupts */
 	cs35l56->sdw_irq_no_unmask = true;
-	cancel_work_sync(&cs35l56->sdw_irq_work);
+	flush_work(&cs35l56->sdw_irq_work);
 	sdw_write_no_pm(peripheral, CS35L56_SDW_GEN_INT_MASK_1, 0);
 	sdw_read_no_pm(peripheral, CS35L56_SDW_GEN_INT_STAT_1);
 	sdw_write_no_pm(peripheral, CS35L56_SDW_GEN_INT_STAT_1, 0xFF);
+	flush_work(&cs35l56->sdw_irq_work);
 
 	cs35l56_remove(cs35l56);
 }
-- 
2.47.3

On Thu, 21 May 2026 13:30:57 +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> ASoC: cs35l56: Fix flushing of IRQ work in cs35l56_sdw_remove()

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-7.1

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs35l56: Fix flushing of IRQ work in cs35l56_sdw_remove()
      https://git.kernel.org/broonie/sound/c/18e7bd9f2446

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark