From nobody Thu Apr 2 14:13:13 2026 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987FD1E868 for ; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 19:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774727551; cv=none; b=OfOh/pe2FP3P+9j+SkL9CQDJ8o9hUJ5QnZaRbfHddk3dZ0JgTQcyU0wp8xaL3CiD212vk90JuNWDnCvR9YpaflDVTDxS878GmjSNJMUm6qy/Cx8mZogySYGabLJ8g8q4UYBNoSE1WJKDnvzKLkd1HN7zPW90TiR3f7NCkX/TdXo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774727551; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qMplLn8Oud7+IXw7Jqz7Q0ci6PUtsFK5BHg8NJ7v5bw=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=KPlqPkZm1OBnFpXVFmpq71GGqLqNPJRk/jrv2pednuvXiUPsqS+cKX2YUUfMWKL8YJqp+dZPSxvluOWbifyY/EilKHq6nmjaILKy0XGnu0rAV9j63TWTRzhl/s9W+WsBVQAi7YtzUMNxZRGvVBj5ZsMyCmNGtEz0ZLyhjn2hyYE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=MfSYtNrV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="MfSYtNrV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CE6C2BCB0; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 19:52:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774727551; bh=qMplLn8Oud7+IXw7Jqz7Q0ci6PUtsFK5BHg8NJ7v5bw=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:Reply-To:From; b=MfSYtNrVdAb9CNV1YiWdPTrNQu7qn0K5wAF1PUFmhUD5bXa8W03nZLYDK2SlbxFDH mgufnpN7O3tHPWcSe9ncrvmx8B2lgTpIQrQxWUSWVN0jDte4nFlhWtO4EPs3I6RZT8 3yFS31+bqXuHP5BtJfoddsQe73x5LwA2TtMg06XOXrFtKOIojMK/gMusP5wOqAnjRK sC4x7XxgXxwGXGnGvJMdA8rzuVpnZS/+NR50pklxzCG97wPSPokxum9sLGROE5j+6M 4TrGGckf/+do38KgKWZcV6VJQDRuEMY+mhXQotdu8CG5IPxDQpwG7MIgnF4SpZnnGk wvu0AMO57JbNA== Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A0810F3DF5; Sat, 28 Mar 2026 19:52:31 +0000 (UTC) From: Kairui Song via B4 Relay Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 03:52:28 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 02/12] mm/mglru: rename variables related to aging and rotation Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20260329-mglru-reclaim-v2-2-b53a3678513c@tencent.com> References: <20260329-mglru-reclaim-v2-0-b53a3678513c@tencent.com> In-Reply-To: <20260329-mglru-reclaim-v2-0-b53a3678513c@tencent.com> To: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Andrew Morton , Axel Rasmussen , Yuanchu Xie , Wei Xu , Johannes Weiner , David Hildenbrand , Michal Hocko , Qi Zheng , Shakeel Butt , Lorenzo Stoakes , Barry Song , David Stevens , Chen Ridong , Leno Hou , Yafang Shao , Yu Zhao , Zicheng Wang , Kalesh Singh , Suren Baghdasaryan , Chris Li , Vernon Yang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Qi Zheng , Baolin Wang , Kairui Song X-Mailer: b4 0.15.0 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1774727549; l=2780; i=kasong@tencent.com; s=kasong-sign-tencent; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=/S4DxXkZbkmPymDZ4txoaa0S870DUGxVp3pt8OKH86o=; b=pAXljMxVpl/JontxkdHTDUsp9N8qbT9jY4ejGTIS5od5hogsVJMNr2Ts2tYOn2yIXqguzcG76 SJV0Ty4ZYC2AXCeVrwYGiT0H3sxlzJDkoGBIVKBtITYnqp2xFDzeTQY X-Developer-Key: i=kasong@tencent.com; a=ed25519; pk=kCdoBuwrYph+KrkJnrr7Sm1pwwhGDdZKcKrqiK8Y1mI= X-Endpoint-Received: by B4 Relay for kasong@tencent.com/kasong-sign-tencent with auth_id=562 X-Original-From: Kairui Song Reply-To: kasong@tencent.com From: Kairui Song The current variable name isn't helpful. Make the variable names more meaningful. Only naming change, no behavior change. Suggested-by: Barry Song Signed-off-by: Kairui Song Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang Reviewed-by: Barry Song Reviewed-by: Chen Ridong --- mm/vmscan.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index adc07501a137..f336f89a2de6 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -4934,7 +4934,7 @@ static bool should_run_aging(struct lruvec *lruvec, u= nsigned long max_seq, */ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc,= int swappiness) { - bool success; + bool need_aging; unsigned long nr_to_scan; struct mem_cgroup *memcg =3D lruvec_memcg(lruvec); DEFINE_MAX_SEQ(lruvec); @@ -4942,7 +4942,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, str= uct scan_control *sc, int s if (mem_cgroup_below_min(sc->target_mem_cgroup, memcg)) return -1; =20 - success =3D should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, &nr_to_scan); + need_aging =3D should_run_aging(lruvec, max_seq, swappiness, &nr_to_scan); =20 /* try to scrape all its memory if this memcg was deleted */ if (nr_to_scan && !mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) @@ -4951,7 +4951,7 @@ static long get_nr_to_scan(struct lruvec *lruvec, str= uct scan_control *sc, int s nr_to_scan =3D apply_proportional_protection(memcg, sc, nr_to_scan); =20 /* try to get away with not aging at the default priority */ - if (!success || sc->priority =3D=3D DEF_PRIORITY) + if (!need_aging || sc->priority =3D=3D DEF_PRIORITY) return nr_to_scan >> sc->priority; =20 /* stop scanning this lruvec as it's low on cold folios */ @@ -5040,7 +5040,7 @@ static bool try_to_shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruve= c, struct scan_control *sc) =20 static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc) { - bool success; + bool need_rotate; unsigned long scanned =3D sc->nr_scanned; unsigned long reclaimed =3D sc->nr_reclaimed; struct mem_cgroup *memcg =3D lruvec_memcg(lruvec); @@ -5058,7 +5058,7 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct s= can_control *sc) memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_LOW); } =20 - success =3D try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc); + need_rotate =3D try_to_shrink_lruvec(lruvec, sc); =20 shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, memcg, sc->priority); =20 @@ -5068,10 +5068,10 @@ static int shrink_one(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct= scan_control *sc) =20 flush_reclaim_state(sc); =20 - if (success && mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) + if (need_rotate && mem_cgroup_online(memcg)) return MEMCG_LRU_YOUNG; =20 - if (!success && lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc)) + if (!need_rotate && lruvec_is_sizable(lruvec, sc)) return 0; =20 /* one retry if offlined or too small */ --=20 2.53.0