From nobody Mon Mar 23 19:52:08 2026 Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74FD63B95F2 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:03:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774274624; cv=none; b=gFKU43CQyodUkFb7Y2odpA68esmpkTn97q3FRb0O2DOvTOwB3GkspJcvHGU7YPIxReL5KtDXMw5NRCnBZUSFXsAhvogDRcpW8sceVBrwcGAg9qrcUH4Jauh2Piyujo19VRzqFLR/aHnF0KuSmVYGIOW1LSGv9JYOYx/XEVpwV2k= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774274624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mVqLy3PIB8oh7hQPAIkCfTSI0PD1tmB7qHJEFdlf8OM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=qzWKkkalrMBDvQjx5vgK3iVemFBN4D6rtY+HDH4Qwcbfv99M2sZcIQMU8vNsoj7dwKVkVLQeqf7eH/uO3emfMsxV9CtmOOfoFKOPxlo/HE2phRTSjsiRh1+SsPlq7J+StGwf6nh3QB52ll8vmRgJcNZdlif8RZkyPr6Jjbz3//0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b=ukPBbpxq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b="ukPBbpxq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject :Cc:To:From:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=L8oY708F0rwG6gMnu6SsuxjoZ696c5uTzUhXGA8NV3g=; b=ukPBbpxqOfxfd4APSemKwRnUsB i1Xw2+xiDrKhRzkW6NMJz0hPsXlntWBbsOVC7IHvA7B63/IdyecYDPdVr5HEatU9MlBUYaJ26bnQV OrHKz/cuXh0OMZwMvZGtcimMw7tSwZZrg3KOoy4vy6dhX/Vy2EYcWyzQQH4G2ZNj6j2M=; Received: from modemcable168.174-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.174.168] helo=pettiford.lan) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w4fsc-000000006JU-0oba; Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:03:42 -0400 From: Hugo Villeneuve To: Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown Cc: hugo@hugovil.com, Hugo Villeneuve , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] regulator: core: fix typo in comments Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 10:03:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20260323140340.105362-1-hugo@hugovil.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam_score: -1.0 X-Spam_bar: - Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Hugo Villeneuve Replace another->other so that the sentence makes sense. Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve --- drivers/regulator/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c index 2286bdf6edcb..dc5d67767336 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c @@ -1550,7 +1550,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_d= ev *rdev, * Existing logic does not warn if over_current_protection is given as * a constraint but driver does not support that. I think we should * warn about this type of issues as it is possible someone changes - * PMIC on board to another type - and the another PMIC's driver does + * PMIC on board to another type - and the other PMIC's driver does * not support setting protection. Board composer may happily believe * the DT limits are respected - especially if the new PMIC HW also * supports protection but the driver does not. I won't change the logic base-commit: c369299895a591d96745d6492d4888259b004a9e --=20 2.47.3