From nobody Tue Apr 7 14:20:30 2026 Received: from mail-pl1-f201.google.com (mail-pl1-f201.google.com [209.85.214.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEC2D34D4CB for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2026 06:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773382374; cv=none; b=TAZIE4MwofSHiJ9ok4gXFHBDV/isndjK62dr+6v5zFA1iU3ee6LLeMeijMUBEGMxE1aa6RmoQQCHYBUYy5eu4Z61bPeUr7OULi+QB+JKsy9723ERoGinElIPIJghqAXb+kJQeOF75qZnzV2eFVAl1wtXgET5MLQX7Uur6DnsAas= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773382374; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MRHw5oy5tFyWNvt56O9mcO7PI2R39CflC4bmNd2C60k=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=H7AvlDzY97jaOzROUB00VhS4Yt92i6OAWEVyG5P06KEpfd95mXL1VtUaRPscdj6yiuxMKd8zhZ08gLv3a9j5xGAcoAu//zxERaxhjCsF0oX9QQILMHaQLb8qv/f9UxINnLovPnBYzM5t2IrAvprCAnCgieIfYPFlqquDhFmf+Eg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ackerleytng.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=P9dBzs5N; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--ackerleytng.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="P9dBzs5N" Received: by mail-pl1-f201.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2aed37d9310so14775ad.3 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 23:12:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20251104; t=1773382372; x=1773987172; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7kRWhL+HkcSRRi26b8Op9JhhRMhDncUeSMvvheOqHO0=; b=P9dBzs5NoIjM9N6ZfHT1tZ/hqembV/VYsLoyIIPFNnwBClMyAq9ChFYkvk/nCRHJkg Oa6ZR3+I0FGjIg2nU/eG1uHFy21+WJtl1yToIgzEX+JdFULLlj6ouD2KddNwN0AwoSfb ZjUpZV3UaZHLkVgevkQIcT4lNu88wAj+e1LPbbyQ4k0bL2Zy34z4utCqrk4ibzIvyN9A cnf8TVgFDeh2qDNhdi9mAg3thBAj7EzpQUz/q7ZrbvMylzO6U7ClAG+yDvSs13R7YnSn gE9jfYU4ZIN5bW+lSBLIRx3NBFq8lvYR0W20WGKeADFE4Ddf+2ZMcSEtU7vU660QG3iQ 0VAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1773382372; x=1773987172; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7kRWhL+HkcSRRi26b8Op9JhhRMhDncUeSMvvheOqHO0=; b=UkJfrggKBb2GiH1UvKq5DcPd9N3nBzsT93oGLNKyR2A8Kbgri19Z2flVcs21rkDtGg 8duQEhWKo358UAvVakzfsIAlqZWvhdLPBiyPXAqhhQmgBScrQjfcXO++KAJsizwIpVGa bjrycDmDB6adIMLa9+1qvT4pfLKphABUA8m5A3lZANLbtV9xBRS5mAJxN/I1cMNF3dSE 6msEY0+06AEycO4i+Nh3HdGOOhpkvtccQ7T9MsrJRzxNciHj0Hw1X+vSvu3JszyGUqw/ V2V41AUxdNoXPO7SNumGwYt6FOdDjkNDD5+drhoJfNpt5iKT57wRrGSoP7LD3LLdwujK 6pvQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU4Y1PwwU0eCdz44qe4mB/ZlMqVP6yPMCJQ6aj6I584IOWKcmoWe0dgurt1tJJrqsK/Y3M7PRcfjaA67vs=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyat1yHq0Zj75gIzz7tpjclrh8M6cgy6rnkbPuvVzcSSk2afKRv 5zaBGDuYeWfxsXbWWNhIYLss3llqIl3rhbExluoopO4zjNHANzGXzxneOj3ZEm2MrMRtGVKBbhv XYUQzNUiSGj/ZMREbDx3yKjnCGQ== X-Received: from plef1.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:902:f381:b0:2ae:420c:c02a]) (user=ackerleytng job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:903:3804:b0:2ae:4445:f397 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2aeca9ec6aamr17773125ad.16.1773382371838; Thu, 12 Mar 2026 23:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2026 06:12:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20260313-gmem-inplace-conversion-v3-0-5fc12a70ec89@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260313-gmem-inplace-conversion-v3-0-5fc12a70ec89@google.com> X-Developer-Key: i=ackerleytng@google.com; a=ed25519; pk=sAZDYXdm6Iz8FHitpHeFlCMXwabodTm7p8/3/8xUxuU= X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1773382364; l=1737; i=ackerleytng@google.com; s=20260225; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=SQorwu5NmjhCMRk1oX2e95cjFDSBZ7C/wme7YI2Safw=; b=BHQfpfOJVOPF572H7KOE0msVDrKGZUSyz6wGCvpiE0UcPhIUix+u1Tv6eCcQRd1Shu80yIiIv kXCpa4oqY4EDKBHo5FBojjEQ0I5LvI6zzsNmcvtkSVZYa1Ejso2F1hk X-Mailer: b4 0.14.3 Message-ID: <20260313-gmem-inplace-conversion-v3-3-5fc12a70ec89@google.com> Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 03/43] KVM: Enumerate support for PRIVATE memory iff kvm_arch_has_private_mem is defined From: Ackerley Tng To: aik@amd.com, andrew.jones@linux.dev, binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, brauner@kernel.org, chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com, david@kernel.org, ira.weiny@intel.com, jmattson@google.com, jroedel@suse.de, jthoughton@google.com, michael.roth@amd.com, oupton@kernel.org, pankaj.gupta@amd.com, qperret@google.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, shivankg@amd.com, steven.price@arm.com, tabba@google.com, willy@infradead.org, wyihan@google.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, forkloop@google.com, pratyush@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Steven Rostedt , Masami Hiramatsu , Mathieu Desnoyers , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Shuah Khan , Vishal Annapurve , Jason Gunthorpe , Vlastimil Babka Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Ackerley Tng Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Sean Christopherson Explicitly guard reporting support for KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE based on kvm_arch_has_private_mem being #defined in anticipation of decoupling kvm_supported_mem_attributes() from CONFIG_KVM_VM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES. guest_memfd support for memory attributes will be unconditional to avoid yet more macros (all architectures that support guest_memfd are expected to use per-gmem attributes at some point), at which point enumerating support KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE based solely on memory attributes being supported _somewhere_ would result in KVM over-reporting support on arm64. Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson --- include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h index e75f7295af5d0..4ba42a1278d5f 100644 --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h @@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ static inline int kvm_arch_vcpu_memslots_id(struct kvm_= vcpu *vcpu) } #endif =20 -#ifndef CONFIG_KVM_VM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES +#ifndef kvm_arch_has_private_mem static inline bool kvm_arch_has_private_mem(struct kvm *kvm) { return false; diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index 301d7ddac6ba6..793a2c8476b09 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -2428,8 +2428,10 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_clear_dirty_log(struct kvm *= kvm, #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_VM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTES static u64 kvm_supported_mem_attributes(struct kvm *kvm) { +#ifdef kvm_arch_has_private_mem if (!kvm || kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm)) return KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE; +#endif =20 return 0; } --=20 2.53.0.851.ga537e3e6e9-goog