From nobody Sun Apr 5 18:20:39 2026 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C856341C2F7; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 17:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772817084; cv=none; b=Ky9JtJQOk9PhSTmgU19gpjkN5Twbw0GNsa+tUB8kuwQ4QJBKUuXn4N3ybz57hpZgYMtQm4gqem3ywMpCOLBzfz8QTAukpRaOnRu6eMNOXgpPSiEakoWBGgpcnosUPNA7zqzklt+fm88LWRH/GB1jaExKdzaQ2IcXhFlmT3UHCdk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772817084; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RwM0lvASFFISwO7mYlHziW2rJGO2q+5K2S9ANJKi+qk=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=ag/kDQK8WtYoYWzva0AKjb7qdkQAR+0aqO+gvzQzQ5zSs+3I5ER5DLbpofmL4SHlzmpDtwONv3JER1bcgZDYl9/Ly5gYeibseOveeHDLDmd4MXaxdeUW1fsJv92HbIXdpTIbAibz3UrhGmvAdIiWT5e14ocO2l4be2krxsvlc50= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=gghwR0a7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="gghwR0a7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A7C13C4CEF7; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 17:11:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772817084; bh=RwM0lvASFFISwO7mYlHziW2rJGO2q+5K2S9ANJKi+qk=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=gghwR0a71jnooATMBX5TocY5duhVClWj7zPggZHjAaCF9uD8eCRsCrOQAJlx+x/OT uHanDt7NRGLoKkO+KfOu0nyqwdlm4MDxs37uVWkg2LU3uuF0sdoFnqWbEHvAhgQx1p 6vBq5t1oqEKubYFosSdVNmUuOdOABEuN6cvPaMYpBtqvF9Rl9xrCUHNRNdEN/9ULKI gjJaV54ad0W5IiG2Zz8wYBleVVNJmDNrDox+4phWDR26vRLR/omreN1J0uXx4xDT+O ist0zJH3f8lZRe+oeIk8tzxjZEvMnAtM++KDHMggpBX/e+LrmoWsUyn0w0dtz3rIUn +UQJlqcONXeAw== From: Mark Brown Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2026 17:01:19 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v10 27/30] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20260306-kvm-arm64-sme-v10-27-43f7683a0fb7@kernel.org> References: <20260306-kvm-arm64-sme-v10-0-43f7683a0fb7@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260306-kvm-arm64-sme-v10-0-43f7683a0fb7@kernel.org> To: Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Catalin Marinas , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton Cc: Dave Martin , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , Ben Horgan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Peter Maydell , Eric Auger , Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-6ac23 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=1215; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=RwM0lvASFFISwO7mYlHziW2rJGO2q+5K2S9ANJKi+qk=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBpqwo9khSGDEm4RKpWoYkjMo875PXE5ezoRFH8g p77Xmqp8JeJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCaasKPQAKCRAk1otyXVSH 0Dc6B/4+xlyIn14vonZiqCu0iFWQPdpktw/K1mXbtG5oUfy1UaOU9VoAgvFwbAmJCJZ6DiB3nm3 uqcfCqwuig8fEMuQcNEvik2VEoSahN2ujQaT2mu5t4y0A3d+sLzNxIayT2d65CAsRnO6NpYNcit gLf5qkvYsJcpi6AYMoyv6IW4GHeS5eZtZQTLD9MiTYDkz4b5VKJ8I8nlDZEETr3ejG+EiLyc4u9 L2c/msSkXv4kQh7PKbP84zA77Rvg1GKyYRW6KSXbx+G28Qp6SXigjf+wlM88FIEw7PtmWgdsaHl 4+5wobzSg4n0fNJdyDKFlvLAUV2KdmOCz7BfQ3VBc8kVyh7n X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB get_safe_value() currently asserts that bitfields it is generating a safe value for must be more than one bit wide but in actual fact it should always be possible to generate a safe value to write to a bitfield even if it is just the current value and the function correctly handles that. Remove the assert. Fixes: bf09ee918053e ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BI= TS and its last user") Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan Signed-off-by: Mark Brown --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testin= g/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c index 73de5be58bab..bfca7be3e766 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c @@ -269,8 +269,6 @@ uint64_t get_safe_value(const struct reg_ftr_bits *ftr_= bits, uint64_t ftr) { uint64_t ftr_max =3D ftr_bits->mask >> ftr_bits->shift; =20 - TEST_ASSERT(ftr_max > 1, "This test doesn't support single bit features"); - if (ftr_bits->sign =3D=3D FTR_UNSIGNED) { switch (ftr_bits->type) { case FTR_EXACT: --=20 2.47.3