From nobody Thu Apr 2 17:39:49 2026 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACB7235295E; Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770849245; cv=none; b=t+nt4Q+rZmMr5bPeXSa1wHLdhruJfYA/3BfGqzVqXJ89l0JSSgq5VQNJKErnWsS8e0qWpkobTXJJ59ulGhV3aVfvE9Sfql5gbdzXw+Bxbgt6iTcQMUzPn9L/RIxg+Qpq7YYK9EEVqWJmWwSPWfZgN3NxD1i7wGE3/cu0GLp0bBg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770849245; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1SDedwVwKlKyZyIz9803hr5LHz0mMjxPi8ePvMIa21s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=eQy9ziAj7FLSdebi2lx8BSftEnJr7F4kQzYlySbCq5NFhYMp8+vqrmLAXUXpsVQQjEVkm0bI3jejJQMNLf87ajM9vql5ACWS6QtjkuYy7f3G3Uwlw8SjjfxQT/GVc28EF9INLUWJcE95PxNN/0p4a1U6AdWpxDJn46gw4J8EpgI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NZSiJIBx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NZSiJIBx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1770849244; x=1802385244; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=1SDedwVwKlKyZyIz9803hr5LHz0mMjxPi8ePvMIa21s=; b=NZSiJIBxcXZwOXdnI6VKltkgaH7uDKOLP9B9lC/QujwXgqwEIQu0e7XY TYVwTSYd6NRxAfgaYejNuDaMZJAmEnh2gZ8NFD1QHyjLR53SCJ9FQ46Rs L9TjsZbXqKPsI6COHcIkrrztx8ePISUKGAn9gLGS2J+g99J6dj5sQQRLH TemUrrBnsMo4lgIg8Ix3i50jkBawB46BCsoMBRWAe1USKxFbyEzWsax17 wranf6Wem+KfmtwtxMG6Nz0LNpesse4YV6KETDwzvoBA9Kf1KHw/vAx4d gCkTvS1L84i4fdCNqjG1q0smp/W+hOoSt5s9Obxg0eRAByHCQG4Zc6fKg A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: LnWrnFldQs+BGRDUVqn8CQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 1E5dTYk2SBOKmFpVE9wwxA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11698"; a="71031269" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,285,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71031269" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2026 14:34:04 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: phA5bNLOQsSM1sn+9yjy9Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ox8A9VH/RqOHSew5mTMhcg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,285,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="216913525" Received: from skuppusw-desk2.jf.intel.com ([10.165.154.101]) by orviesa004-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2026 14:34:04 -0800 From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan To: "Rafael J . Wysocki" Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada , Zhang Rui , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1] powercap: intel_rapl_tpmi: Remove FW_BUG from invalid version check Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:34:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20260211223401.1575776-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On partitioned systems, multiple TPMI instances may exist per package, but RAPL registers are only valid on one instance since RAPL has package-scope control. Other instances return invalid versions during domain parsing, which is expected behavior on such systems. Currently this generates a firmware bug warning: intel_rapl_tpmi: [Firmware Bug]: Invalid version Remove the FW_BUG tag, downgrade to pr_debug(), and update the message to clarify that invalid versions are expected on partitioned systems where only one instance can be valid. Fixes: 9eef7f9da928 ("powercap: intel_rapl: Introduce RAPL TPMI interface d= river") Reported-by: Zhang Rui Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan --- drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_ra= pl_tpmi.c index 0a0b85f4528b..0f8abdc592bc 100644 --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl_tpmi.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static int parse_one_domain(struct tpmi_rapl_package *t= rp, u32 offset) tpmi_domain_flags =3D tpmi_domain_header >> 32 & 0xffff; =20 if (tpmi_domain_version =3D=3D TPMI_VERSION_INVALID) { - pr_warn(FW_BUG "Invalid version\n"); + pr_debug("Invalid version, other instances may be valid\n"); return -ENODEV; } =20 --=20 2.43.0