From nobody Sat Feb 7 05:33:04 2026 Received: from canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C9D939E6FA; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.224 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770125851; cv=none; b=mgtEwMpUSVELSj8NrE3hRaso430EuNLBpkEabxyw5W/3PS6/3PFNn0KGTzJYA9BNyjuRX5eqWEYzp9io7sd9iSPg/bZtX4/KX7ixyBhGWcJs55c7KFnPw8F1gu7fptTzSJqtgZ/VbgYP5Sjf+sBKCX4Jp0Q6FP+te8cJHWITXZo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770125851; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qe/yhx+t69riQc31YdHZh/F5ASxA9FYLkaaS7GdUtAg=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Yw0m+WgtKR7lkET81johEPjcNSzT4J4Vb1UZXJ7yRrQoV3bWHagWH2sA9bwstNdJHfdeucWhQ9Ov/Ua54UwhqhFYFUn6VnjGVhfGGZpIDK1r3kZ3RY7MOLOWZ7/wZhUyec6HEV8eKIfmMpxET8R5CrKjMVAfGQA8NoblPn9swiM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=S1Ay/oOm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.224 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="S1Ay/oOm" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=0OmR7IcBjZ5/SmEciMeHVWWbvI+Yv2j0arxgRpAgb9A=; b=S1Ay/oOmYS9KF1mw8aecgvL2+fCIGOrEOE6Ax2E/Yi3DIULf0c93Lbjn4p8ZTa4JTcFwSjfat DcFUzzLRxj+Yn5dhXj3d/xeE3/rzwrfWKeP+uU6PxVU1OAesXo+wNrsyHS4LarCx5GcRcbqPh/p GretA31dbdDd4KOsXSwIOMk= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.200]) by canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4f54DD1G8vz1cyPV; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:32:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861B04055B; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:37:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:37:15 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v12 08/13] arm64: syscall: Rework el0_svc_common() Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:37:23 +0800 Message-ID: <20260203133728.848283-9-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20260203133728.848283-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20260203133728.848283-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems200002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.68) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The generic syscall syscall_exit_work() has the following content: | audit_syscall_exit(regs) | trace_sys_exit(regs, ...) | ptrace_report_syscall_exit(regs, step) The generic syscall syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() has the following form: | unsigned long work =3D READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->syscall_work) | rseq_syscall() | if (unlikely(work & SYSCALL_WORK_EXIT)) | syscall_exit_work(regs, work) In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code, rework el0_svc_common() as below: - Rename syscall_trace_exit() to syscall_exit_work(). - Add syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() function to replace the combination of read_thread_flags() and syscall_exit_work(), also move the syscall exit check logic into it. Move has_syscall_work() helper into asm/syscall.h for reuse. - As currently rseq_syscall() is always called and itself is controlled by the CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ macro, so the CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ check is removed. Reviewed-by: Kevin Brodsky Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 7 ++++++- arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 14 +++++++++++--- arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 20 +------------------- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysc= all.h index 7feb3cda6530..bee5208c0006 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h @@ -114,7 +114,12 @@ static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct = *task) return AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64; } =20 +static inline bool has_syscall_work(unsigned long flags) +{ + return unlikely(flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK); +} + int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags); -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags); +void syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work(struct pt_regs *regs); =20 #endif /* __ASM_SYSCALL_H */ diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c index 50344a2d7b88..499ee0a5b9cd 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -2453,10 +2453,8 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, unsign= ed long flags) return ret ? : syscall; } =20 -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags) +static void syscall_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags) { - rseq_syscall(regs); - audit_syscall_exit(regs); =20 if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) @@ -2466,6 +2464,16 @@ void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsign= ed long flags) report_syscall_exit(regs); } =20 +void syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + unsigned long flags =3D read_thread_flags(); + + rseq_syscall(regs); + + if (has_syscall_work(flags) || flags & _TIF_SINGLESTEP) + syscall_exit_work(regs, flags); +} + /* * SPSR_ELx bits which are always architecturally RES0 per ARM DDI 0487D.a. * We permit userspace to set SSBS (AArch64 bit 12, AArch32 bit 23) which = is diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c index e8fd0d60ab09..66d4da641d97 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c @@ -65,11 +65,6 @@ static void invoke_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigne= d int scno, choose_random_kstack_offset(get_random_u16()); } =20 -static inline bool has_syscall_work(unsigned long flags) -{ - return unlikely(flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK); -} - static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr, const syscall_fn_t syscall_table[]) { @@ -130,21 +125,8 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int s= cno, int sc_nr, } =20 invoke_syscall(regs, scno, sc_nr, syscall_table); - - /* - * The tracing status may have changed under our feet, so we have to - * check again. However, if we were tracing entry, then we always trace - * exit regardless, as the old entry assembly did. - */ - if (!has_syscall_work(flags) && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ)) { - flags =3D read_thread_flags(); - if (!has_syscall_work(flags) && !(flags & _TIF_SINGLESTEP)) - return; - } - trace_exit: - flags =3D read_thread_flags(); - syscall_trace_exit(regs, flags); + syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work(regs); } =20 void do_el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs) --=20 2.34.1