From nobody Sat Feb 7 07:10:40 2026 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0779E34D397; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770123851; cv=none; b=AadSJ9/pKkXgWi6AHt8T9ROqH9yvcCeXtVI9smRgy7DOxK3IHJMVhZK7n8yDV724eVXSkoS5FXoyTsU2jCGtrAAdvn8lUHl/8jDhB8AZSAskG4bUIPizB9pSlGH+vdQG8T7GsAkYwZDjvSymevnymHsPvLfgcETiKafXjKKOBAY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770123851; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iu/6wbDM3+DN3segrCwy5n6ESBaKhfAYCkfTohMEYqg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=RsrPuU0HvXTCMtvSgh3YTMtZW2zmX5kw7Q5FRewVXBSmQDGjbPlYjPfeO4Q3rMdS4THsslf5/t9Ionguqkxb6FCZ3PSoiBbN+XpTwi3EsScfbirjcQ3W0+lgsT14JwbQ1pDp4Z6Rf2PsJFmpVKw9k0e1JnNmjLl2JZ4kUQetH/A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CB71042; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 05:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ergosum.cambridge.arm.com (ergosum.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.45]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 125BA3F632; Tue, 3 Feb 2026 05:04:06 -0800 (PST) From: Anshuman Khandual To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Anshuman Khandual , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Ryan Roberts , Yang Shi , Christoph Lameter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64/mm: Reject memory removal that splits a kernel leaf mapping Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:03:48 +0000 Message-Id: <20260203130348.612150-3-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20260203130348.612150-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> References: <20260203130348.612150-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Linear and vmemmap mapings that get teared down during a memory hot remove operation might contain leaf level entries on any page table level. If the requested memory range's linear or vmemmap mappings falls within such leaf entries, new mappings need to be created for the remaning memory mapped on the leaf entry earlier, following standard break before make aka BBM rules. But kernel cannot tolerate BBM amd hemce remapping to fine grained leaves would not be possible on systems without BBML2_NOABORT. Currently memory hot remove operation does not perform such restructuring, and so removing memory ranges that could split a kernel leaf level mapping need to be rejected. while memory_hotplug.c does appear to permit hot removing arbitrary ranges of memory, the higher layers that drive memory_hotplug (e.g. ACPI, virtio, ...) all appear to treat memory as fixed size devices. So it is impossible to hotunplug a different amount than was previously hotplugged, and hence we should never see a rejection in practice, but adding the check makes us robust against a future change. Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aWZYXhrT6D2M-7-N@willie-the-truck/ Fixes: bbd6ec605c0f ("arm64/mm: Enable memory hot remove") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Suggested-by: Ryan Roberts Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual --- arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 155 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 149 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c index 8ec8a287aaa1..3fb9bcbd739a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c @@ -2063,6 +2063,142 @@ void arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size, struct= vmem_altmap *altmap) __remove_pgd_mapping(swapper_pg_dir, __phys_to_virt(start), size); } =20 + +static bool addr_splits_kernel_leaf(unsigned long addr) +{ + pgd_t *pgdp, pgd; + p4d_t *p4dp, p4d; + pud_t *pudp, pud; + pmd_t *pmdp, pmd; + pte_t *ptep, pte; + + /* + * PGD level: + * + * If addr is PGD_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PGDIR_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + + pgdp =3D pgd_offset_k(addr); + pgd =3D pgdp_get(pgdp); + if (!pgd_present(pgd)) + return false; + + /* + * P4D level: + * + * If addr is P4D_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, P4D_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + + p4dp =3D p4d_offset(pgdp, addr); + p4d =3D p4dp_get(p4dp); + if (!p4d_present(p4d)) + return false; + + /* + * PUD level: + * + * If addr is PUD_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PUD_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + + pudp =3D pud_offset(p4dp, addr); + pud =3D pudp_get(pudp); + if (!pud_present(pud)) + return false; + + if (pud_leaf(pud)) + return true; + + /* + * CONT_PMD level: + * + * If addr is CONT_PMD_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PMD_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + + pmdp =3D pmd_offset(pudp, addr); + pmd =3D pmdp_get(pmdp); + if (!pmd_present(pmd)) + return false; + + if (pmd_cont(pmd)) + return true; + + /* + * PMD level: + * + * If addr is PMD_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PMD_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + + if (pmd_leaf(pmd)) + return true; + + /* + * CONT_PTE level: + * + * If addr is CONT_PTE_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, CONT_PTE_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + + ptep =3D pte_offset_kernel(pmdp, addr); + pte =3D __ptep_get(ptep); + if (!pte_present(pte)) + return false; + + if (pte_cont(pte)) + return true; + + /* + * PTE level: + * + * If addr is PAGE_SIZE aligned - already on a leaf boundary + */ + if (ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE) =3D=3D addr) + return false; + return true; +} + +static bool can_unmap_without_split(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pa= ges) +{ + unsigned long phys_start, phys_end, size, start, end; + + phys_start =3D PFN_PHYS(pfn); + phys_end =3D phys_start + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE; + + /* + * PFN range's linear map edges are leaf entry aligned + */ + start =3D __phys_to_virt(phys_start); + end =3D __phys_to_virt(phys_end); + if (addr_splits_kernel_leaf(start) || addr_splits_kernel_leaf(end)) { + pr_warn("[%lx %lx] splits a leaf entry in linear map\n", + phys_start, phys_end); + return false; + } + + /* + * PFN range's vmemmap edges are leaf entry aligned + */ + size =3D nr_pages * sizeof(struct page); + start =3D (unsigned long)pfn_to_page(pfn); + end =3D start + size; + if (addr_splits_kernel_leaf(start) || addr_splits_kernel_leaf(end)) { + pr_warn("[%lx %lx] splits a leaf entry in vmemmap\n", + phys_start, phys_end); + return false; + } + return true; +} + /* * This memory hotplug notifier helps prevent boot memory from being * inadvertently removed as it blocks pfn range offlining process in @@ -2071,8 +2207,11 @@ void arch_remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size, struct = vmem_altmap *altmap) * In future if and when boot memory could be removed, this notifier * should be dropped and free_hotplug_page_range() should handle any * reserved pages allocated during boot. + * + * This also blocks any memory remove that would have caused a split + * in leaf entry in kernel linear or vmemmap mapping. */ -static int prevent_bootmem_remove_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, +static int prevent_memory_remove_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data) { struct mem_section *ms; @@ -2118,11 +2257,15 @@ static int prevent_bootmem_remove_notifier(struct n= otifier_block *nb, return NOTIFY_DONE; } } + + if (!can_unmap_without_split(pfn, arg->nr_pages)) + return NOTIFY_BAD; + return NOTIFY_OK; } =20 -static struct notifier_block prevent_bootmem_remove_nb =3D { - .notifier_call =3D prevent_bootmem_remove_notifier, +static struct notifier_block prevent_memory_remove_nb =3D { + .notifier_call =3D prevent_memory_remove_notifier, }; =20 /* @@ -2172,7 +2315,7 @@ static void validate_bootmem_online(void) } } =20 -static int __init prevent_bootmem_remove_init(void) +static int __init prevent_memory_remove_init(void) { int ret =3D 0; =20 @@ -2180,13 +2323,13 @@ static int __init prevent_bootmem_remove_init(void) return ret; =20 validate_bootmem_online(); - ret =3D register_memory_notifier(&prevent_bootmem_remove_nb); + ret =3D register_memory_notifier(&prevent_memory_remove_nb); if (ret) pr_err("%s: Notifier registration failed %d\n", __func__, ret); =20 return ret; } -early_initcall(prevent_bootmem_remove_init); +early_initcall(prevent_memory_remove_init); #endif =20 pte_t modify_prot_start_ptes(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long add= r, --=20 2.30.2