From nobody Mon Feb 9 13:00:57 2026 Received: from mail-pl1-f202.google.com (mail-pl1-f202.google.com [209.85.214.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34551368282 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769721977; cv=none; b=q56Sf3COlDAVq2xzwOYW4EpT5qH1TtzGjw/y3PeK4h7zVit60p7pg3QQf2LqFo0EEgCyuMAzLSTXsupfEbc3yIqTMiYa0fry7sb50ImgGp5rDHaRYPwJ4aWWP4X8yF4EQbSbELnK5S1lPkf+fq8erUe1krNP8tz6EPRGGlwMY2Q= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769721977; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PuQG/fB45n7aUAZcDzwF1eani2iX652Um8BM/GdHrKU=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=G/UuYtxhO+e29fpfpdSSWHBRV9rboFfEZGZEByQXgRMd03pe3YXzrCkF7Jp1ZgRiJ+tWxr1rkbtBRFMPBmNZodpJoo6NDXEU9lNANb5kgf+Lkf0+pPg1UY7TuhFm55k6MNGmU/8t4pyawi1Qow5SnpMV9S2hmmP7Az8Wfde5CZc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--dmatlack.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=YZ16ggfg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.202 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--dmatlack.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="YZ16ggfg" Received: by mail-pl1-f202.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2a863be8508so17026035ad.2 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:26:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1769721968; x=1770326768; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JG18MDRMH4VUqggxYa+ZNtdyrKhzyTrjCDPr+CW7RY4=; b=YZ16ggfgThMakvaPkiOwKSqLjIUwlXsrv8pgb1dsBaIOedEBTeBjltvRX1/yqNjM0u 94PCo03HyzNhKd44zCNmWyv5jQY03/ruvL0b4U/Dtwxk1Ck33gdIIXralwPwZAJo5hyS cRrJASefFpbCGG+uKT5IV/83eBDcfT56ZHiUVVy+LtVlKZFDGlddxW4Fm3fiWWrxgiNX rX5AmbN6eFTWHFdUZ1OSXofIXK0ji9K/BMP3mBVKzBmXkagvO2k+0RcFFAsJGxUGF8Bg G9KMhERvbDQVz85QKtJPVkUZ6xnszjnKNcp6iwtdRk4Zh98Dy0WGLyciGtbUFu5GVYFM rpWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1769721968; x=1770326768; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=JG18MDRMH4VUqggxYa+ZNtdyrKhzyTrjCDPr+CW7RY4=; b=vVVX9xNR6PcP4wKgJFiDWcpXOK+2WTaUPNwLN7yClpkh9H50kC8p4RmRYKmwmwoHth 0fAjxKFWmr/H4HdGKJSxIEMJsjgtC4u+jRGRh+K7nM4Q1zinmlIJPIg+bgjLwEkRMr78 qzMPxJVVMr+vC6DBbgp1DF9YESDLllEtmmNGOsZ9yFPG293NnvwenPD7WIW3s252DqwN qNQy9Ca9nK9/y0L8P+sHWVXx6M6k8Q2J0/UVcBxAHc8XKJy7zAmyEqOeOcP5pTg59bat kCBNHqFab7MlItQ1+ERGmCLz+WYDxNB+xh+eIVNvIT9AvH7ZkEH3utO11VSlEyeeAU3r rh3w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWZbyzF+lNNjJxUDnZR5K6vEYMLaDfiBQGu3/Rm2ZALbkWVq0Dcyx/nfR1Ek3G/e8apX/YhGT32OoF468Q=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx0P5QsfmIbnYiwT+FMOkg6FKBeTiJ1Shl1683QYgHFPjJIWPeK pO7yE+5qpptNxj9dSkEBBVfoMiLxWdyc8GUq3ezu0+FS8FHCQiv4BSvM/E81I/ehdiidLlMD/XM LjfjUqs1WJvooYA== X-Received: from pldv20.prod.google.com ([2002:a17:902:ca94:b0:29f:2b44:973b]) (user=dmatlack job=prod-delivery.src-stubby-dispatcher) by 2002:a17:903:1c1:b0:2a7:90a5:2c95 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2a8d819ac05mr6111855ad.51.1769721967422; Thu, 29 Jan 2026 13:26:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 21:25:05 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20260129212510.967611-1-dmatlack@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20260129212510.967611-1-dmatlack@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0.rc1.225.gd81095ad13-goog Message-ID: <20260129212510.967611-19-dmatlack@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 18/22] vfio: selftests: Add vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test From: David Matlack To: Alex Williamson Cc: Adithya Jayachandran , Alexander Graf , Alex Mastro , Alistair Popple , Andrew Morton , Ankit Agrawal , Bjorn Helgaas , Chris Li , David Matlack , David Rientjes , Jacob Pan , Jason Gunthorpe , Jason Gunthorpe , Jonathan Corbet , Josh Hilke , Kevin Tian , kexec@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky , Leon Romanovsky , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Lukas Wunner , "=?UTF-8?q?Micha=C5=82=20Winiarski?=" , Mike Rapoport , Parav Pandit , Pasha Tatashin , Pranjal Shrivastava , Pratyush Yadav , Raghavendra Rao Ananta , Rodrigo Vivi , Saeed Mahameed , Samiullah Khawaja , Shuah Khan , "=?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Hellstr=C3=B6m?=" , Tomita Moeko , Vipin Sharma , Vivek Kasireddy , William Tu , Yi Liu , Zhu Yanjun Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Vipin Sharma Add a selftest to exercise preserving a vfio-pci device across a Live Update. For now the test is extremely simple and just verifies that the device file can be preserved and retrieved. In the future this test will be extended to verify more parts about device preservation as they are implemented. This test is added to TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED since it must be run manually along with a kexec. To run this test manually: $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/scripts/setup.sh 0000:00:04.0 $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test --stage 1 00= 00:00:04.0 $ kexec ... # NOTE: Exact method will be distro-dependent $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/scripts/setup.sh 0000:00:04.0 $ tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test --stage 2 00= 00:00:04.0 The second call to setup.sh is necessary because preserved devices are not bound to a driver after Live Update. Such devices must be manually bound by userspace after Live Update via driver_override. This test is considered passing if all commands exit with 0. Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma Co-developed-by: David Matlack Signed-off-by: David Matlack --- tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile | 4 + .../vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_= test.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftest= s/vfio/Makefile index 666310872217..55d685f6e540 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/Makefile @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS +=3D vfio_pci_device_init_perf_test TEST_GEN_PROGS +=3D vfio_pci_driver_test TEST_GEN_PROGS +=3D vfio_pci_liveupdate_uapi_test =20 +# This test must be run manually since it requires the user/automation to +# perform a kexec during the test. +TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED +=3D vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test + TEST_FILES +=3D scripts/cleanup.sh TEST_FILES +=3D scripts/lib.sh TEST_FILES +=3D scripts/run.sh diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test.c = b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..15b3e3af91d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vfio/vfio_pci_liveupdate_kexec_test.c @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +#include +#include + +static const char *device_bdf; + +static char state_session[LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_NAME_LENGTH]; +static char device_session[LIVEUPDATE_SESSION_NAME_LENGTH]; + +enum { + STATE_TOKEN, + DEVICE_TOKEN, +}; + +static void before_kexec(int luo_fd) +{ + struct vfio_pci_device *device; + struct iommu *iommu; + int session_fd; + int ret; + + iommu =3D iommu_init("iommufd"); + device =3D vfio_pci_device_init(device_bdf, iommu); + + create_state_file(luo_fd, state_session, STATE_TOKEN, /*next_stage=3D*/2); + + session_fd =3D luo_create_session(luo_fd, device_session); + VFIO_ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0); + + printf("Preserving device in session\n"); + ret =3D luo_session_preserve_fd(session_fd, device->fd, DEVICE_TOKEN); + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + close(luo_fd); + daemonize_and_wait(); +} + +static void after_kexec(int luo_fd, int state_session_fd) +{ + struct vfio_pci_device *device; + struct iommu *iommu; + int session_fd; + int device_fd; + int stage; + + restore_and_read_stage(state_session_fd, STATE_TOKEN, &stage); + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(stage, 2); + + session_fd =3D luo_retrieve_session(luo_fd, device_session); + VFIO_ASSERT_GE(session_fd, 0); + + printf("Finishing the session before retrieving the device (should fail)\= n"); + VFIO_ASSERT_NE(luo_session_finish(session_fd), 0); + + printf("Retrieving the device FD from LUO\n"); + device_fd =3D luo_session_retrieve_fd(session_fd, DEVICE_TOKEN); + VFIO_ASSERT_GE(device_fd, 0); + + printf("Finishing the session before binding to iommufd (should fail)\n"); + VFIO_ASSERT_NE(luo_session_finish(session_fd), 0); + + printf("Binding the device to an iommufd and setting it up\n"); + iommu =3D iommu_init("iommufd"); + + /* + * This will invoke various ioctls on device_fd such as + * VFIO_DEVICE_GET_INFO. So this is a decent sanity test + * that LUO actually handed us back a valid VFIO device + * file and not something else. + */ + device =3D __vfio_pci_device_init(device_bdf, iommu, device_fd); + + printf("Finishing the session\n"); + VFIO_ASSERT_EQ(luo_session_finish(session_fd), 0); + + vfio_pci_device_cleanup(device); + iommu_cleanup(iommu); +} + +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) +{ + device_bdf =3D vfio_selftests_get_bdf(&argc, argv); + + sprintf(device_session, "device-%s", device_bdf); + sprintf(state_session, "state-%s", device_bdf); + + return luo_test(argc, argv, state_session, before_kexec, after_kexec); +} --=20 2.53.0.rc1.225.gd81095ad13-goog