From nobody Sat Feb 7 21:24:56 2026 Received: from out-178.mta0.migadu.com (out-178.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816C7357A2D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 13:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.178 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768223225; cv=none; b=BDJdEdzcXxytXKDBZUeGdAvqAidlWTDmhwNShEwl+RTQ+cadmOIaC3+n2RXYd58XQ1SQBAlK52BTsaXYIcWlwm9Bv3Fp4gsxjXlNcJslqfVTvN09N/YtP9s/vMj2nM4aBupoC4VSK5a48I9kxIJoWbRq4PLAwClWA5+I9imIv74= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768223225; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FsiGsnhkfIMq5xQxcHKbKkmD3OAOQscT86cIg6iw2U8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=m03cRkGZVvkbHgbJR+DEBRC5CrsnDIGWqO+bnkTF/6aqPDa2+1KLz7RbQhq8H/O5A6AaTXYZFqt1XRqPp+XPEPVcNH7+cFDBIUUB7/BZulDKRobudlhiCIhSOxrlAXsJBifu0dLUl2QJygf6TxyXOUOD2HRpC1xr7Lr9D4c0djI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=nbZWez4/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="nbZWez4/" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1768223211; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xbIJal/gfJnpbqOOXrwfFZL/+IG8MB1cGwJ3x0vOuxo=; b=nbZWez4/3ZblIOQ9G5g1ieE4N3T2mwTJlVl9gJg/aoSELhCwJc6RjuHmqLay54jx93el+z BEWStciT9kNesSkrMC+2aO9/21ZAjpXZ2LIr9my8LnofPN6pHuFMHCsrjdw98RMtlAPnOq AC85xzrI22VLmhCcvdG0U4gnYjuT9OM= From: Fushuai Wang To: Jason@zx2c4.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wangfushuai@baidu.com, vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] wireguard: allowedips: Use kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu() Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 21:06:33 +0800 Message-Id: <20260112130633.25563-1-fushuai.wang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Fushuai Wang Replace call_rcu() + kmem_cache_free() with kfree_rcu() to simplify the code and reduce function size. Signed-off-by: Fushuai Wang Reviewed-by: Simon Horman --- drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c | 9 ++------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/all= owedips.c index 09f7fcd7da78..5ece9acad64d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/allowedips.c @@ -48,11 +48,6 @@ static void push_rcu(struct allowedips_node **stack, } } =20 -static void node_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu) -{ - kmem_cache_free(node_cache, container_of(rcu, struct allowedips_node, rcu= )); -} - static void root_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu) { struct allowedips_node *node, *stack[MAX_ALLOWEDIPS_DEPTH] =3D { @@ -271,13 +266,13 @@ static void remove_node(struct allowedips_node *node,= struct mutex *lock) if (free_parent) child =3D rcu_dereference_protected(parent->bit[!(node->parent_bit_packe= d & 1)], lockdep_is_held(lock)); - call_rcu(&node->rcu, node_free_rcu); + kfree_rcu(node, rcu); if (!free_parent) return; if (child) child->parent_bit_packed =3D parent->parent_bit_packed; *(struct allowedips_node **)(parent->parent_bit_packed & ~3UL) =3D child; - call_rcu(&parent->rcu, node_free_rcu); + kfree_rcu(parent, rcu); } =20 static int remove(struct allowedips_node __rcu **trie, u8 bits, const u8 *= key, --=20 2.36.1