From nobody Sun Feb 8 22:00:35 2026 Received: from cvsmtppost17.nm.naver.com (cvsmtppost17.nm.naver.com [114.111.35.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F6913C918 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2025 15:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.111.35.32 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766934525; cv=none; b=D8aoK2CxPAqmIdiTVFUumTznLUtvVWWk2QXo7DVIuzgWtez9/VU1DSuPWkk6B/7mDxKiA46VvG1msR/VedzvFqZyNvjOmGDJ050xOcxtbVmGHjTmNXlqOnokHVQEDiS9pwOoFKwWrCm9Lnk1XDUQE0RkWXeSY98Lvr3JRd6G0qI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766934525; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Frvj/entSvMCMMNUjhAxwvB8VkFzQfUNvBpWvIOEKFU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=WjR5VmTcX9r3XZ12bdlzMf5YUNmrcxp614kDtRQi2YEZEedRVC2+LieSCBdoTbjXv4pAUvy32dTk2YzzLgl2JSfDvKwlg5nPRqPA3DB9vlEv+pc2+uiHP+JFvdH/UlWahIHHhlIKrGhDnHUePrqxo7eaLxLV3j/Hllxcy74rG1o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=naver.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=naver.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=naver.com header.i=@naver.com header.b=f8W8U5Qm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.111.35.32 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=naver.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=naver.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=naver.com header.i=@naver.com header.b="f8W8U5Qm" Received: from cvsendbo034.nm ([10.112.20.50]) by cvsmtppost17.nm.naver.com with ESMTP id D7Fs7j9jQWm9chqpCWmVvg for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2025 14:58:33 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=naver.com; s=s20171208; t=1766933913; bh=Frvj/entSvMCMMNUjhAxwvB8VkFzQfUNvBpWvIOEKFU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:Feedback-ID: X-Works-Security; b=f8W8U5Qmj6UN+kQfOSfBmEAb9NZFwqKwMeCFUeH+c9rdaYG3UDMpQcrnz+VcWVQ50 EWety4KqzrkLW9vOrP3RicMd/93qto7vE9T7IiqiaVQIsoDUaKlKSM/lyBk5rZW8MJ tWLvKLyM/iTg3XVayQiRLoKYBf89wBy/yaZQWfkS0y1OB/iBxRfyyxiNWGhzW3wBPv RM29gafnn3d/uiESoT+Uqlbxub/VqDaWXTvloqhtgS5N7bX2coFP/3GBNUhsPOvWx5 OiMVfs3DXMSHxp2nGkPDazmUvWvaBS4NWFJ/bTrIdlDaD8dTBgSPcXCOcEZqFs+gLI IPwdrX9Jl418w== X-Session-ID: Rbd0LRaSTPaqAHRIcmyxqQ X-Works-Send-Opt: E/YqjAJYjHmwKo2qKqJYFquqFNwkx0eFjAJYKg== X-Works-Smtp-Source: ewnmaxMrFqJZ+HmqKxEw+6E= Received: from JMW-Ubuntu.. ([14.38.141.199]) by mvnsmtp01.nm.naver.com with ESMTP id Rbd0LRaSTPaqAHRIcmyxqQ for (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Sun, 28 Dec 2025 14:58:33 -0000 From: Minu Jin To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, s9430939@naver.com Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: use PTR_ALIGN for buffer alignment Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2025 23:58:23 +0900 Message-ID: <20251228145823.3250174-1-s9430939@naver.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Replace manual pointer alignment calculation with the standard PTR_ALIGN macro in rtw_init_cmd_priv() This improves code readability and ensures the use of kernel's preferred alignment mechanism instead of manual calculation Signed-off-by: Minu Jin --- drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c b/drivers/staging/rtl= 8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c index ef2d92b5588a..0d2e8fade9c4 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_cmd.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include =20 static struct _cmd_callback rtw_cmd_callback[] =3D { {GEN_CMD_CODE(_Read_MACREG), NULL}, /*0*/ @@ -175,7 +176,7 @@ int rtw_init_cmd_priv(struct cmd_priv *pcmdpriv) if (!pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) return -ENOMEM; =20 - pcmdpriv->cmd_buf =3D pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf + CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ - = ((SIZE_PTR)(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf) & (CMDBUFF_ALIGN_SZ-1)); + pcmdpriv->cmd_buf =3D PTR_ALIGN(pcmdpriv->cmd_allocated_buf, CMDBUFF_ALIG= N_SZ); =20 pcmdpriv->rsp_allocated_buf =3D rtw_zmalloc(MAX_RSPSZ + 4); =20 --=20 2.43.0