From nobody Sun Feb 8 12:19:23 2026 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [178.238.236.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C6FD145B3E; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 22:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766528703; cv=none; b=lmonVEb56MOccjBRlB5tO2/D7LSQMbxtgpU3Mw3tZo8vywuoisSVKxoa0dwjuuVBNZngvAqyrH92yr3ZQsdNfrHLsQgFcCVlMSVJSDy1gE5MdVLG4YKVohsRc2qOXuC0KG6RY5j7ECa8EDSBbhpSPrmVt6+0bQ+2ip0wILxncgE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766528703; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/UhzCUqmK4qUQyWOJNX0MMLccQy5CJJj5Cms+KWwWDI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=cTuCpWK0xTjQaG/vTOQ7lzoD+HOS2o0LSGXUKuPXUDuvXekz8qmpM/RISPXb/dXAo3sA7vV3Sv5k9qzbUXTpXjuo+rG0xmKwRGjNOwNzdcUAIxa5EOru1wjNzZd1V2SbTGDS61zaCmW5BlCGNrP/lanVVjRmhcmctzTNzTr42cc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b=uRU49PUn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="uRU49PUn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=Cc:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References; bh=zesieDMS+8jPaC30brfolPDkkyIu1P+PmJ186yiohqE=; b=uRU49PUnHSF4uxGmyh6FNrTZim VU0xUUxM3WKlb8nuTRR19m1I/zVhEPCtd/J0ulf/BZ2siXHrfx1YYMeQdi2WE6cqe6ZOAfY51EEpJ B7CgkXpdRfmCnuPhXEYrWZqPvYAURly5Dx5Chub6/jVH5Uq9pS3TYXd51HM/PD5jtEc2y+V+NSgR4 Lm8ADAstRik6orcKiNjbAPT+yjoEq++ZQ9kEKd2Qdnh7sNKjzH+bfTP8l9LYqK2DSHpdjfGdpoYYL N7Qp9nUHM/tXHNOZ36QnZpPi4Tfrq6ECOTBWj51dl6rdoBsOigNNxGEy67RfEOnmkWgkHPsqv8Vi7 Fzi7WUVg==; From: Andreas Kemnade To: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andreas Kemnade Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx: imx6sl: fix lcdif compatible Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:24:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20251223222435.538096-1-andreas@kemnade.info> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Fix lcdif compatible according to bindings doc. dtbs_check tested only, a glance at the datasheet shows that it should be the correct fallback compatible. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade --- arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sl.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sl.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/= imx/imx6sl.dtsi index 7381fb7f8912..13b0474aa42c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sl.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sl.dtsi @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ epdc: epdc@20f4000 { }; =20 lcdif: lcdif@20f8000 { - compatible =3D "fsl,imx6sl-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; + compatible =3D "fsl,imx6sl-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"; reg =3D <0x020f8000 0x4000>; interrupts =3D <0 39 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; clocks =3D <&clks IMX6SL_CLK_LCDIF_PIX>, --=20 2.47.3