From nobody Sun Feb 8 12:14:36 2026 Received: from mail.andi.de1.cc (mail.andi.de1.cc [178.238.236.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2653C314A9F; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 20:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766522739; cv=none; b=MSouDYSbZs+U1OsgKsU8Sinf7p34aF4fFFekAVzTmDKMPKJ8gzjstRK0c+zw795PNDgZX4cV52nsE1AlHu8HCtdm+bFkiqUd9BPgRKjPWUZuJ5a+NLinxmvZCnYAcVVLYD6XuGk8+u7jmjhaxjGPkD7uZHa6nTxi3JjDvgLgeRk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766522739; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0lQCY9+NvII7vyq2Wrfozp9yDqbJh+Ps7dDexIi6QHo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=AGnkmYIHByGPazEo6a6VEZv/dkh2nh03noLcvh1vE2dLQ8DjnnUuir9h3m9Irp/28MkYcaqEf4XC70DLGF8pCzzUtva3M5fpb0qVgEyFifo6qkfPEsEyhYJOATNGpqWqSc9M2R6OJuq9dIMPSw7vG+4mQzQAK3XchLca0CJTdIU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b=aMi5+Q6z; arc=none smtp.client-ip=178.238.236.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kemnade.info Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kemnade.info header.i=@kemnade.info header.b="aMi5+Q6z" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kemnade.info; s=20220719; h=Cc:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References; bh=EcsX7uDCRbuiIl7dRX9wEcE1RLO3su8HcpACXdkFO24=; b=aMi5+Q6zkrPr2C6QMte8X/foa+ jnRGVZVtGnyNTnlY/inifpOS8k//RLQIMkzC/afsiWeqzGULo9mTp7q0PurVZci5VHXFxranOUfFX W2OAAclI1Yc4061BqFnh+oRAUzEY381eZZf4Rz+10wUHN6oDRKKOTUG/hNfyF/s7xIdT1/5/EVoxy /xnREGfJQSnGNR2kuukYTZouR8N/KynsBSvNvTgt8iSrLHzaVc7J4c0Wa/CC+0KQueQmwFtm9MKSh dRu7n4HHlATmQeX7ESnUDEsY2hLkvt3NduvwMoR+rXY2Z0LFxs48aj+7vCDQ2ku6JnEjRGk13r0r4 y9HQ9MbQ==; From: Andreas Kemnade To: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andreas Kemnade Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: imx: imx6sll: fix lcdif compatible Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 21:43:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20251223204302.519468-1-andreas@kemnade.info> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.3 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Fix lcdif compatible according to bindings doc. dtbs_check tested only, a glance at the datasheet shows that it should be the correct fallback compatible. Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade --- arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sll.dtsi | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sll.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp= /imx/imx6sll.dtsi index 704870e8c10c..c96669605d1d 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sll.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6sll.dtsi @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ pxp: pxp@20f0000 { }; =20 lcdif: lcd-controller@20f8000 { - compatible =3D "fsl,imx6sll-lcdif", "fsl,imx28-lcdif"; + compatible =3D "fsl,imx6sll-lcdif", "fsl,imx6sx-lcdif"; reg =3D <0x020f8000 0x4000>; interrupts =3D ; clocks =3D <&clks IMX6SLL_CLK_LCDIF_PIX>, --=20 2.47.3