From nobody Tue Feb 10 03:45:31 2026 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3DB3446C5; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:23:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766453012; cv=none; b=ojwXY3urdtc9DlQ0AfhyYucvZU01kPEA6wmZk5WixyxI2JfB0QkuXCco5+0oCbjiqy66N7nNp6SQMuBoE+XEtlXoW4RbH8cAm6ynlHUnin/pc8R3yyVmmX0LFfd56z+TaF7WQp+MIEgryhP1CgUvQs07xKu49jsXaORter136Os= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766453012; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z5j3l5hq06OVglsz6W9Xs4iwgZIZ/lq9hxI6ABS0IYM=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=c2aaX01ACAS15bsgQHVOEtU2jT34AiqreQi1ISZtoG/bxSYogxl3xgMjdQi6cfnok6bUinAdwfY69MOP1F7zs179R7hUCPG2fLJCMilxd4vyZAcv4oIJtbZ77c/j9+Soj5iksgeDcVfKW1x8cieTUUzVUA85XzuBZyw/BgrQabE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=q+qxLBd1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="q+qxLBd1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B13B3C19423; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:23:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1766453011; bh=Z5j3l5hq06OVglsz6W9Xs4iwgZIZ/lq9hxI6ABS0IYM=; h=From:Date:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:To:Cc:From; b=q+qxLBd1+fBvecWLmFic4UBW2LgCAzlPUr9zb0EF80h8QkPP4HPOhbO1rYiVYjGw/ Jw/yDNNQ9ERhcqDPInp5hXfwMU9jFrWbRvCjExBqhyYrmwgs7bQe1ph9AGup0JCjap osv3tq9df9wVDVMyI0Fd8zzQxG2Bk0SKNgPTsznaTCF0131x2EfWFuCfSNMx6iLjkz Df/sZea2lE3kMBvsMpupIkq0UGmU8kZ0jKCUkfHTTdbMLq0mFI3sJ8IH8HJ2ss9h/H oSKwuE8qVSTBLzmXbeIB2XWAQNHzi7jsoBZSkw3QToRd8h+fUJL0lQOAXzNLRroh2X OEUuStJ92mzHA== From: Mark Brown Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 01:21:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v9 27/30] KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove spurious check for single bit safe values Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20251223-kvm-arm64-sme-v9-27-8be3867cb883@kernel.org> References: <20251223-kvm-arm64-sme-v9-0-8be3867cb883@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251223-kvm-arm64-sme-v9-0-8be3867cb883@kernel.org> To: Marc Zyngier , Joey Gouly , Catalin Marinas , Suzuki K Poulose , Will Deacon , Paolo Bonzini , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Oliver Upton Cc: Dave Martin , Fuad Tabba , Mark Rutland , Ben Horgan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Peter Maydell , Eric Auger , Mark Brown X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-47773 X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=openpgp-sha256; l=1169; i=broonie@kernel.org; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=Z5j3l5hq06OVglsz6W9Xs4iwgZIZ/lq9hxI6ABS0IYM=; b=owEBbQGS/pANAwAKASTWi3JdVIfQAcsmYgBpSe6XuZqDZHAD1EbYrK8wn0phiB+1DdVn6PblO QAM9RR2+ICJATMEAAEKAB0WIQSt5miqZ1cYtZ/in+ok1otyXVSH0AUCaUnulwAKCRAk1otyXVSH 0JJCB/4y34p+VTk0tkbCqrPh1qJK7fJsyrMK/+p5SaTDCsoRuuE4RyMJ5RqomOK0FgfnkdBHk2P va9Xud+cf24Dezk4eYeg6HQaJtZRQnK1AnSqKOMOfxx5fqmK8wljWyR/QII8LA4UrQWX7vGTpYp t9Wmb+EZUJoVc14h9Mfmqcum/aUjTjiEm4RnN1HO+PdnxU5p3HRXlQfB0g1RRPSvkzwr3w+Bish 0erE71BlCyTFzonFUO3SH+5UhD1w/bCILJybHOzBsnDEcw/jBIyIVUI7eKq9CJ7lEMfhxExTe2M bTitMkcm7AoeoGDCM1CjdBli5WAddd0qICzdghkryQSjmMmN X-Developer-Key: i=broonie@kernel.org; a=openpgp; fpr=3F2568AAC26998F9E813A1C5C3F436CA30F5D8EB get_safe_value() currently asserts that bitfields it is generating a safe value for must be more than one bit wide but in actual fact it should always be possible to generate a safe value to write to a bitfield even if it is just the current value and the function correctly handles that. Remove the assert. Fixes: bf09ee918053e ("KVM: arm64: selftests: Remove ARM64_FEATURE_FIELD_BI= TS and its last user") Signed-off-by: Mark Brown Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c b/tools/testin= g/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c index c4815d365816..322cd13b9352 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/arm64/set_id_regs.c @@ -270,8 +270,6 @@ uint64_t get_safe_value(const struct reg_ftr_bits *ftr_= bits, uint64_t ftr) { uint64_t ftr_max =3D ftr_bits->mask >> ftr_bits->shift; =20 - TEST_ASSERT(ftr_max > 1, "This test doesn't support single bit features"); - if (ftr_bits->sign =3D=3D FTR_UNSIGNED) { switch (ftr_bits->type) { case FTR_EXACT: --=20 2.47.3