From nobody Tue Feb 10 12:40:32 2026 Received: from mail.loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F081DFF0; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 03:48:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.242.206.163 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766029737; cv=none; b=OtE+4ERhfsFuyfCtGhfab5ZzcJyMqkrlAnvnY4+m6pnv2vvQRDNQJVlvqUa5CwZcPULheKD/sTXiA+lZjgbvi235MspXqHbOzxJCVvq9sZghGASL1EryxF1PUS5JWhKDgh+kuRA+Ze0oeO3eqtanxeqKA1YUAbrEUDprao95rwY= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766029737; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IYV1X0ga8qRMf8n/ktRwHAqi6IKsEaS/OiTA+PNidmw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=se1oluXJrCulhK3J+UPZ99cpV7F9sYixf5/TA36PNA6DYMnq2G50+xoxqx0E/1+wVeTbFQSWd5FKUY6OfySLAIfU9C4/T9J+6Jxvx5e3ZwctIw2L9zYHEJ5A/lJiX486BvfWa/PlpC9d3aB0I79P6GhPiqTU8bwN6oSjiLbAK4M= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=114.242.206.163 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=loongson.cn Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=loongson.cn Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [10.2.5.213]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8Axz8OleUNpbVwAAA--.1760S3; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:48:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.2.5.213]) by front1 (Coremail) with SMTP id qMiowJBx68GfeUNpvy4BAA--.2184S3; Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:48:50 +0800 (CST) From: Bibo Mao To: Gonglei , "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , Eric Biggers , Xuan Zhuo , =?UTF-8?q?Eugenio=20P=C3=A9rez?= , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , wangyangxin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH v4 1/9] crypto: virtio: Add spinlock protection with virtqueue notification Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 11:48:38 +0800 Message-Id: <20251218034846.948860-2-maobibo@loongson.cn> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 In-Reply-To: <20251218034846.948860-1-maobibo@loongson.cn> References: <20251218034846.948860-1-maobibo@loongson.cn> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CM-TRANSID: qMiowJBx68GfeUNpvy4BAA--.2184S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: xpdruxter6z05rqj20fqof0/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7KY7 ZEXasCq-sGcSsGvfJ3UbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy29KBjDU0xBIdaVrnUUvcSsGvfC2Kfnx nUUI43ZEXa7xR_UUUUUUUUU== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" When VM boots with one virtio-crypto PCI device and builtin backend, run openssl benchmark command with multiple processes, such as openssl speed -evp aes-128-cbc -engine afalg -seconds 10 -multi 32 openssl processes will hangup and there is error reported like this: virtio_crypto virtio0: dataq.0:id 3 is not a head! It seems that the data virtqueue need protection when it is handled for virtio done notification. If the spinlock protection is added in virtcrypto_done_task(), openssl benchmark with multiple processes works well. Fixes: fed93fb62e05 ("crypto: virtio - Handle dataq logic with tasklet") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao Acked-by: Jason Wang --- drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c b/drivers/crypto/vi= rtio/virtio_crypto_core.c index 3d241446099c..ccc6b5c1b24b 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/virtio/virtio_crypto_core.c @@ -75,15 +75,20 @@ static void virtcrypto_done_task(unsigned long data) struct data_queue *data_vq =3D (struct data_queue *)data; struct virtqueue *vq =3D data_vq->vq; struct virtio_crypto_request *vc_req; + unsigned long flags; unsigned int len; =20 + spin_lock_irqsave(&data_vq->lock, flags); do { virtqueue_disable_cb(vq); while ((vc_req =3D virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len)) !=3D NULL) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data_vq->lock, flags); if (vc_req->alg_cb) vc_req->alg_cb(vc_req, len); + spin_lock_irqsave(&data_vq->lock, flags); } } while (!virtqueue_enable_cb(vq)); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data_vq->lock, flags); } =20 static void virtcrypto_dataq_callback(struct virtqueue *vq) --=20 2.39.3