From nobody Thu Dec 18 23:23:46 2025 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7146631B10E; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 03:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765768551; cv=none; b=kOI/SITlBTNjqzdbqEZx94kLzNZVsWJGEw7cdhvzlUFmATx/ibhn2cYQIqbcPadvSgVYSj6SLm74CLbjtftlBu2K7Sa2HYCCKkLfok+3zEqhm4yMe7JiuXpHJgc5JGYFKA6SXnpYGnMOP5M9N7kRYVog76AumZPlGZnKwUqqulA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765768551; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5wGxFAzPCZzXdUiLcKcpv0pmrt/Eeien8O+af0qkCGY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=LaDtKbjXJrdqfE5siRKkRjByNC/ERer5ousP8RUu67KS9Q/vgq0gIxREA+Gakb56ZL3/4pjyLXg576QWcTlLxQg9lIljyKbmHixZGuiuWGUUmHwTrXEwMcZfYuw2m+WjxvTwJWxCQ7SyCLYV8EqLN51aotpIvQ0J7gWMEhZmbdg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dV4tn299JzYQtpL; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:15:13 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264CE1A06D7; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:15:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.50.87.129]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAXd_dUfT9p8AnuAA--.53622S15; Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:15:36 +0800 (CST) From: linan666@huaweicloud.com To: song@kernel.org, yukuai@fnnas.com, neil@brown.name, namhyung@gmail.com Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k@mgml.me, linan666@huaweicloud.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com Subject: [PATCH v3 11/13] md/raid10: fix any_working flag handling in raid10_sync_request Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2025 11:04:42 +0800 Message-Id: <20251215030444.1318434-12-linan666@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 In-Reply-To: <20251215030444.1318434-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> References: <20251215030444.1318434-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAXd_dUfT9p8AnuAA--.53622S15 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtFy7uFy8Zw47GF1fKry8Krg_yoWkKFXEka y5ZF4aqr1I9r12yw15Ar1SvrW3Za1UWFs7WryUtry8Z34fZ3WFkr98uF95Zw15ZF98XFyY kw1FgrySva1DujkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbL8FF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAVCq3wA2048vs2 IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxSw2x7M28E F7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWDJVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW8Jr0_Cr 1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0D M2vYz4IE04k24VAvwVAKI4IrM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64 kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1Y6r17McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1U McvjeVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACjI8F5VA0II8E6IAqYI8I64 8v4I1lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1lw4CEc2x0rVAKj4xxMxkF7I0En4kS14v26r1q 6r43MxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI 0_Jr0_Jr4lx2IqxVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCIc40Y 0x0EwIxGrwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r4j6ryUMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UMIIF0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVW8JVWx JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7VUbQeOt UUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: polqt0awwwqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Li Nan In raid10_sync_request(), 'any_working' indicates if any IO will be submitted. When there's only one In_sync disk with badblocks, 'any_working' might be set to 1 but no IO is submitted. Fix it by setting 'any_working' after badblock checks. Fixes: e875ecea266a ("md/raid10 record bad blocks as needed during recovery= .") Signed-off-by: Li Nan Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai --- drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c index 6e64a817f1f8..67955609ee14 100644 --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c @@ -3413,7 +3413,6 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mdd= ev, sector_t sector_nr, !test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) continue; /* This is where we read from */ - any_working =3D 1; sector =3D r10_bio->devs[j].addr; =20 if (is_badblock(rdev, sector, max_sync, @@ -3428,6 +3427,7 @@ static sector_t raid10_sync_request(struct mddev *mdd= ev, sector_t sector_nr, continue; } } + any_working =3D 1; bio =3D r10_bio->devs[0].bio; bio->bi_next =3D biolist; biolist =3D bio; --=20 2.39.2