From nobody Mon Dec 1 22:07:44 2025 Received: from out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-130.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 755A82032D for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 02:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.130 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764556713; cv=none; b=P5zNEUPADIv8bQt9i2rtdCVp/VFzeZxoUUGJS2oYD4I/3ZUNHGprsLyXAr4u3VyIyzLu2Q1oLg0SOvhr8YBY3olGX4zXRqf4z5b1wD8QXvsQGVzB7YFu8HJu9/w0qXTY4LzxjCSSVW9wboFRDUvtCIYlzeAJQUgthYxo6rZBCKc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764556713; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jowzc/T93pJg3Mtefhi+/lzat1yVZ5orRuFHLA29Ig8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=nJUmhsTTA73MxPjz1HeHgUPcSvqvJnUPoz1aVvoNOkA8zawqJj4F5nIQUBs4CGiwz2JIGo81nqsF3dXZFSUe+qe52JqAd+pDEEXS1tDD24TqnSXdIJhO4JaMUamqpHJD6gzVB3RSw9EQnYLIfY1h4zufjzbmq8w+SBBmlKePPcU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=mTXFY1Rr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="mTXFY1Rr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1764556701; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; bh=dGMuG/uhfFS031kWTMc0pshBSmQ8+D9uJQLSsOT9IGs=; b=mTXFY1RrymNHXfnCQdfMVZvkSyTS+BXu0vLsQiCEPwLsuWvjMo+u7uLBAcWbaICJZaEnVxMWTaLvGbvtKQFnROrgmhEPHI1R+sY9J3weaAPWj072LNXac5SXG1fF+Jd8WyqFBbpT4rxi3wzzp3lSUDoG2SavHJiHo922/1ds5kI= Received: from x31i01179.sqa.na131.tbsite.net(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WtkUtv7_1764556697 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Mon, 01 Dec 2025 10:38:21 +0800 From: Gao Xiang To: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: LKML , Gao Xiang Subject: [PATCH] erofs: switch on-disk header `erofs_fs.h` to MIT license Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 10:38:16 +0800 Message-ID: <20251201023816.1045273-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.5 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Switch to the permissive MIT license to make the EROFS on-disk format more interoperable across various use cases. It was previously recommended by the Composefs folks, for example: https://github.com/composefs/composefs/pull/216#discussion_r1356409501 Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang Acked-by: Chao Yu Acked-by: Chunhai Guo Acked-by: Hongbo Li Acked-by: Jianan Huang Acked-by: Jingbo Xu --- fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h index 3d5738f80072..e24268acdd62 100644 --- a/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h +++ b/fs/erofs/erofs_fs.h @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR Apache-2.0 */ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */ /* * EROFS (Enhanced ROM File System) on-disk format definition * --=20 2.43.5