From nobody Mon Dec 1 23:05:39 2025 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2162626D4F9; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764163215; cv=none; b=shYJGY6qJjApLucoDRA8WJwM633fXqRtcuGYc6cHicPG+iqioUxs5S3MSfZQNcDuwHSTM/kdl2fsTlvcqI/yUI8ptnQgslnvMq2wF8/0RerNaw/Cp5XCUq+iI92NEvaggmPX9MHk3GhK5R6nceTV9F/nhEoWmK8DzvMC5rbACAk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1764163215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ltdOJycY3sDDX0uPBNfRJ/CZ9LopyY+2sk6yZsVKKWQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Vs2CBAXgufvyTXha49ldhGbya4NMHbzjU6ljp9nVPuXoBTZo/dhKpw4Mi0RpJW0Ka+tqtUpJHaifSDF1ZAe7nKyliLehdhK4bn5MCBSyHnCtRYOn/yuSmNKmFKT0aefRSRhjcA13v0yxEQumI+2u5sjUbZ0VIk83DBKM+wEPtsk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R6nsMVaK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R6nsMVaK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC226C116C6; Wed, 26 Nov 2025 13:20:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1764163214; bh=ltdOJycY3sDDX0uPBNfRJ/CZ9LopyY+2sk6yZsVKKWQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=R6nsMVaKLj1Y2h5Ioo+V9XAsLOzvKmNbMLQ0j3D2jrrzIzb0TDhhOI/B4NIt5txT2 3RvDpCssxHjcZwqL1cwsyYUsScnL2b6bir3kVh4XMRms0Sa6w7LYpVyjQaB5I32zhd WXB9sJhr4m7EaQkVjZXI/Y3zCbWLisj54C1CyG6fyXzz+mIUpSbTaIHiJeccZ105H9 5N7cA9lI9CuUL0hXYElx9TpWe86JRCBbmEQpC0+UxQGxRohhECN/otmgwoycbH5sLG PxtJvcM3npDalTTZdtJENGNZ3y3zfy5qTUglAcdgefDlZUx1KFYFLclOX1DDbd8Ic4 5l6r0aJjXAolg== From: Philipp Stanner To: Sumit Semwal , Gustavo Padovan , =?UTF-8?q?Christian=20K=C3=B6nig?= , Felix Kuehling , Alex Deucher , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Jani Nikula , Joonas Lahtinen , Rodrigo Vivi , Tvrtko Ursulin , Huang Rui , Matthew Auld , Matthew Brost , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , Lucas De Marchi , =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Hellstr=C3=B6m?= Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Philipp Stanner Subject: [PATCH 2/6] amd/amdkfd: Ignore return code of dma_fence_signal() Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2025 14:19:11 +0100 Message-ID: <20251126131914.149445-4-phasta@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 In-Reply-To: <20251126131914.149445-2-phasta@kernel.org> References: <20251126131914.149445-2-phasta@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The return code of dma_fence_signal() is not really useful as there is nothing reasonable to do if a fence was already signaled. That return code shall be removed from the kernel. Ignore dma_fence_signal()'s return code. Suggested-by: Christian K=C3=B6nig Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd= /amdkfd/kfd_process.c index ddfe30c13e9d..950fafa4b3c3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c @@ -1986,7 +1986,6 @@ kfd_process_gpuid_from_node(struct kfd_process *p, st= ruct kfd_node *node, static int signal_eviction_fence(struct kfd_process *p) { struct dma_fence *ef; - int ret; =20 rcu_read_lock(); ef =3D dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(&p->ef); @@ -1994,10 +1993,10 @@ static int signal_eviction_fence(struct kfd_process= *p) if (!ef) return -EINVAL; =20 - ret =3D dma_fence_signal(ef); + dma_fence_signal(ef); dma_fence_put(ef); =20 - return ret; + return 0; } =20 static void evict_process_worker(struct work_struct *work) --=20 2.49.0