From nobody Tue Dec 2 00:46:33 2025 Received: from wxsgout04.xfusion.com (wxsgout03.xfusion.com [36.139.52.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B46018B0A; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 02:19:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=36.139.52.80 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763950800; cv=none; b=pV42jjVeBJH5LtiWK3BWvNrMnkdgzL7bkROC8tWAAQi/47gJzMpE0G36cZkHL7YWBr+BEIf4Yp8P2uobh8I1W82seAIJVlqkCiCuc4bXGz1Dna/++pvfBTE/HvknpkqJfnNBWT+XOA2NmOC1FxmvMwJ89L4k9uxwa9FKIoFFNps= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763950800; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ie0gj8wY77Jlfqx4kJJF+9LMvcIjxzq8ymFXAV6j3Cs=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TEf5igM2/eIIydsCk7Dye5cOWxfBIGD43+W8eSQJpj8ULJ3wf710+zMKdoXnzlPXzys6b61YUX3xKJZHCJQsOVV2ZHxCSWe8k5ghT2gnFOVr9oDJLBUol6hMhloNLuQlL6MZ+dU+aBRAm12Qa56QlViOCpDUOjQoyhuYI4ZlQLE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xfusion.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xfusion.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=36.139.52.80 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xfusion.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xfusion.com Received: from wuxpheds03048.xfusion.com (unknown [10.32.143.30]) by wxsgout04.xfusion.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dF8G81fNQzB6C7F; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:02:08 +0800 (CST) Received: from DESKTOP-Q8I2N5U.xfusion.com (10.82.130.100) by wuxpheds03048.xfusion.com (10.32.143.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.2.2562.20; Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:03:10 +0800 From: shechenglong To: , CC: , , , , , shechenglong Subject: [PATCH v2 1/1] block: fix typos in comments and strings in blk-core Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2025 10:02:58 +0800 Message-ID: <20251124020258.1022-2-shechenglong@xfusion.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1.windows.1 In-Reply-To: <20251124020258.1022-1-shechenglong@xfusion.com> References: <20251104123500.1330-2-shechenglong@xfusion.com> <20251124020258.1022-1-shechenglong@xfusion.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: wuxpheds03047.xfusion.com (10.32.141.63) To wuxpheds03048.xfusion.com (10.32.143.30) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This patch fixes multiple spelling mistakes in comments and documentation in the file block/blk-core.c. No functional changes intended. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Signed-off-by: shechenglong Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig --- block/blk-core.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c index 14ae73eebe0d..8387fe50ea15 100644 --- a/block/blk-core.c +++ b/block/blk-core.c @@ -662,13 +662,13 @@ static void __submit_bio(struct bio *bio) * bio_list of new bios to be added. ->submit_bio() may indeed add som= e more * bios through a recursive call to submit_bio_noacct. If it did, we f= ind a * non-NULL value in bio_list and re-enter the loop from the top. - * - In this case we really did just take the bio of the top of the list = (no + * - In this case we really did just take the bio off the top of the list= (no * pretending) and so remove it from bio_list, and call into ->submit_b= io() * again. * * bio_list_on_stack[0] contains bios submitted by the current ->submit_bi= o. * bio_list_on_stack[1] contains bios that were submitted before the curre= nt - * ->submit_bio, but that haven't been processed yet. + * ->submit_bio(), but that haven't been processed yet. */ static void __submit_bio_noacct(struct bio *bio) { @@ -743,8 +743,8 @@ void submit_bio_noacct_nocheck(struct bio *bio, bool sp= lit) /* * We only want one ->submit_bio to be active at a time, else stack * usage with stacked devices could be a problem. Use current->bio_list - * to collect a list of requests submited by a ->submit_bio method while - * it is active, and then process them after it returned. + * to collect a list of requests submitted by a ->submit_bio method + * while it is active, and then process them after it returned. */ if (current->bio_list) { if (split) @@ -901,7 +901,7 @@ static void bio_set_ioprio(struct bio *bio) * * submit_bio() is used to submit I/O requests to block devices. It is pa= ssed a * fully set up &struct bio that describes the I/O that needs to be done. = The - * bio will be send to the device described by the bi_bdev field. + * bio will be sent to the device described by the bi_bdev field. * * The success/failure status of the request, along with notification of * completion, is delivered asynchronously through the ->bi_end_io() callb= ack @@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ int iocb_bio_iopoll(struct kiocb *kiocb, struct io_comp= _batch *iob, * point to a freshly allocated bio at this point. If that happens * we have a few cases to consider: * - * 1) the bio is beeing initialized and bi_bdev is NULL. We can just + * 1) the bio is being initialized and bi_bdev is NULL. We can just * simply nothing in this case * 2) the bio points to a not poll enabled device. bio_poll will catch * this and return 0 --=20 2.33.0