From nobody Tue Dec 2 03:00:26 2025 Received: from canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.224]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21D933373D; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 13:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.224 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763386283; cv=none; b=pqyLXS6kMges9CZsAfTBhIhniN34IvsH7nL+9IZOxB/lFGhUr0xXoXftQ6oH43SfqtWT4CbTO513D59WYqSUwjG2qt/DL1CRKHAwOQxLOCGAzot+JS0eNdfgpoJU9rnuCgBQyki2jnDsSMvwk8TrDjJ4TK25XslCQfqokn8CaVs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763386283; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vR4ujFeL/c/rSyeE+Ew/QgmViHAeCETlnfNIV7PYf2Y=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DdZjyoAE2gBJ3HpbvCiEQigGXm2vfBwWAbKF60VZltXzJdwutB8GDpZM/epnomI/YLivNTstQncZPJz67vnzrF7cCmIjAF8ylwqHUC+hPLpxbQn2ggGM270lrEPUaXvXlICx1ywbIRAb0P/ILuXG06EvmO2cUbdOu9rZmepHHAs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=XCdll9/W; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.224 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="XCdll9/W" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=kQJChy4CSig7WwWYt7pGFEdPu8K8NX2y5MQxbd1imwo=; b=XCdll9/WfiN+9U5PmTpPKoAREVR7KqYPR4vpBiFW1qdQOrehyTN+qOdp6g4vWfpvcmKX4Ek1o ZaxJoqJiZOKKoW/7JzAhVQ/sWCNiZDkXuW++bpMiXhOo2Nrn6NWbHi9iKn+3lhHdK12FtfG96OU FbilBiHRQZ6cuST6Q8DJ/bk= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.17]) by canpmsgout09.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4d97rT4yJXz1cyqF; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:29:29 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.131]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB31B1A0188; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:31:12 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.73) by dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:31:11 +0800 From: Jinjie Ruan To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: Subject: [PATCH v7 05/11] arm64/ptrace: Handle ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 21:30:42 +0800 Message-ID: <20251117133048.53182-6-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20251117133048.53182-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20251117133048.53182-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems100002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.206) To dggpemf500011.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.131) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The generic entry handle error of ptrace_report_syscall_entry(), but arm64 not. As the comment said, the calling arch code should abort the system call and must prevent normal entry so no system call is made if ptrace_report_syscall_entry() return nonzero. In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code, return early if ptrace_report_syscall_entry() encounters an error. Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan --- arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c index 95984bbf53db..707951ad5d24 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c @@ -2317,10 +2317,10 @@ enum ptrace_syscall_dir { PTRACE_SYSCALL_EXIT, }; =20 -static void report_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) +static int report_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *regs) { - int regno; unsigned long saved_reg; + int regno, ret; =20 /* * We have some ABI weirdness here in the way that we handle syscall @@ -2342,9 +2342,13 @@ static void report_syscall_enter(struct pt_regs *reg= s) saved_reg =3D regs->regs[regno]; regs->regs[regno] =3D PTRACE_SYSCALL_ENTER; =20 - if (ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs)) + ret =3D ptrace_report_syscall_entry(regs); + if (ret) forget_syscall(regs); + regs->regs[regno] =3D saved_reg; + + return ret; } =20 static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) @@ -2374,9 +2378,11 @@ static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs) =20 int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long = flags) { + int ret; + if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) { - report_syscall_enter(regs); - if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU) + ret =3D report_syscall_enter(regs); + if (ret || (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) return NO_SYSCALL; } =20 --=20 2.34.1