From nobody Sun Feb 8 06:05:34 2026 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A27AA2F3C3F; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763046484; cv=none; b=M2g3Nxy6TwMQpiNKqnAMDVenGK17broaLlTaT+KlIq8PcQpeuXS+QWu5Bwxw+1OsNPTPYTCVnczSiTkqulvKK5GZEtuwRctivaD4gb4ytmKtCENP0KERsaRxfFtGqra7SAtB3QI7EyO5r/jQBWjXTFxos9cLJdaiRoCpc+QDxds= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763046484; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vVxo53vSl4vNNa3h1pRmqCHs0UCW3WG53zBAqX1k8ow=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=plaxzs6ncJosMeevK8ULIu3hTXGIdEuA7QodjvUtKj5rafVlMAUnKpL3Z7VdVp/DTSCeGAi7kDitgzJT6iO4pbh9r9oyDnnzKJ8nqLihjEUpNKWmnKbYMOGBCsnvu9GIuMntZpmuk0dqkFPpPcnET8V//uLoSmWUfieTotJONCw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=mqMxtPPI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="mqMxtPPI" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AD9dZ28005929; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=tVu78ZgGQdLrSNhHy pJCNj9s/OFeKer38VxsTuK4pbw=; b=mqMxtPPI7YzLODbdD+4zazzTShAy304gU 574Dcwa2uX5lR607gXvtiFLAzEZGgCLSEyHe/vt0HPYz8ymkOI8/xwH+5vQyJyKZ dTJZ4mKsRc3gFjGufzlHfBNxgSjtQgOZF/mo2QQDOHaXuF/QH4PQhL0D0xmvEOz4 naLqJ+nyOlqOVApI3kOBXl5Vkc1iPNLBveB+o48za6mZbyJEE21kPXZRAbU17NNR VaU3aq3AWQizwgFscNl1QWAXqdr8lnFZKC2HwpQeUjJFDMO5dQF2JNneROzAtcNY fnFwZYS11VkrX3V9kcF2BEkXuIG2bYd1mNsuFZaTqr4mnSGVHBdEg== Received: from ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (db.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.219]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a9wc7grv0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5ADCj1ig011605; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:35 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.225]) by ppma11.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4aajw1p40m-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:35 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay05.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5ADF7Vtc39715096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:32 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A5520040; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26252004B; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:07:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Heiko Carstens To: Alexander Gordeev , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Andreas Krebbel , Arnd Bergmann , =?UTF-8?q?Thomas=20Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= , Willy Tarreau , Andrii Nakryiko , Alexei Starovoitov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/8] s390/kvm: Use psw32_t instead of psw_compat_t Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:07:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20251113150731.2697279-3-hca@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <20251113150731.2697279-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20251113150731.2697279-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMTA4MDAxOCBTYWx0ZWRfX6gr4t0L/yl4d TdEuAi4JquVA0ePQaOjpZ8I1jWAtaJ1TlI+vwpAgJEH5nt7FeUqNxNHdNi21Ium/xNAdvQR9MOD KlMf7q7MBuEeWLUoNGiOUjGAFOrsosW5aUTK1Prrv3sugwFvhEGeDt3Q0j6xyXcCns/vOoCseGy PuYCN4PFn4gEGhqK/KCZDkJD7ru4jLTBAJpW/qAh06uaC3f2m8BcN2mYYngXjdCErkm48/se8A+ TmGOlHhhWYaAniYvNumAlQm25kg70lrfU4QVYfcASJbCiDSObEJ2Pzi68K9OcXxPyGoDLRjY+d6 yex6nnQ83yvG6xRQlWuSBaCy1stHRAxXtRag9xcwShI/8Ung7Y0PHEoCz4B52eRwWhYQeQcjWKY JOCYV/xUcm4gjMkpLvQh9onwEuYyKg== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=GcEaXAXL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6915f438 cx=c_pps a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:117 a=aDMHemPKRhS1OARIsFnwRA==:17 a=6UeiqGixMTsA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=gR_8SojlSWN7whlt0LAA:9 a=cPQSjfK2_nFv0Q5t_7PE:22 X-Proofpoint-GUID: DBh7kQzkOzGLZbSUm378SXFJwRfcTjF4 X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: DBh7kQzkOzGLZbSUm378SXFJwRfcTjF4 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-11-13_02,2025-11-13_01,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2511080018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" kvm_s390_handle_lpsw() make use of the psw_compat_t type even though the code has nothing to do with CONFIG_COMPAT, for which the type is supposed to be used. Use psw32_t instead. Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens --- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index 9a71b6e00948..0b14d894f38a 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) int kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { psw_t *gpsw =3D &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw; - psw_compat_t new_psw; + psw32_t new_psw; u64 addr; int rc; u8 ar; --=20 2.48.1