From nobody Sun Feb 8 05:07:32 2026 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53B353346B9; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762800891; cv=none; b=Z08ugxdOp0r3NSbjp1vP7EsVbUVxYlfErq1NIkfZX20Hh+7ravZHwOQVtxxKD5IqL/AlAdhY5LM6JhtSTFA1LlRLXcfp2a/YEDE20FYwFfZAEiFQU1ySYsGCydWGQJNMvnwBYG8FWXqmaNEkglFXoi3AMRfv84p2GiyxFuJwRaI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762800891; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aNb8py/b4jZsppjSKK8XdMx1rBPhco6QTflKaURlSlg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=rFXErQUL0H2JZa9WlnKpe8J/Q1D4wFDH/on/L9klGSgU3keLw66rshZ/tzvQlrd4rWJ0k1b+QX5jB6/JooAYymmuOxmU9On7rtuRuegBrHe8Bagfp8wmDUOiW5jUVXgyIYQLx/9qwbU/AmbQbvm67ZCuxElw/w+D017fW4QT+Wk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=qCDRiBrc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="qCDRiBrc" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AADT4ii017447; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:46 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=J1+Dy/7Bp2maC86Pb Cxhmf3BMcyqDto95F0tNjlhhDY=; b=qCDRiBrcVWGUWC1A0WN6eZACcAw0wTlD8 w/XWBoDWFtsCJ7GeMwcur2SvNHSjC+N4PklAMqU7hWoGbp8hXr9rtHoxKDoUrTWP 2IGPy0PULpUw7JlazH2s8NB5c/HOOym9j5Jzu0Cj45TEJnwmicK/qb0pw2vmUVTi WSdIhna6VbTye66lLfoNG7TweHgW+PwpV6z4t6ay6Aq4VNMq+xmf/zBdHKC0Q34h l5mA6gnIbqNcFtx1KzWLkSn0rfgkeUAGOBE2wrM8th5/beRQ238AEyfrJLlKdNF2 b08P1/PkqS+b4+ohiObafbxhNFo4r8C5J5OF2jEwHmCqdsfGightw== Received: from ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5c.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.92]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4a9wc71tt8-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 5AAGWmDx004755; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:45 GMT Received: from smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.230]) by ppma22.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4aagjxq89t-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:45 +0000 Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.101]) by smtprelay06.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 5AAIsfhf11600346 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:41 GMT Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3499820040; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0631A2004E; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (unknown [9.152.85.9]) by smtpav02.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:54:40 +0000 (GMT) From: Heiko Carstens To: Alexander Gordeev , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Sven Schnelle , Andreas Krebbel , Arnd Bergmann , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/8] s390/kvm: Use psw32_t instead of psw_compat_t Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 19:54:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20251110185440.2667511-3-hca@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.48.1 In-Reply-To: <20251110185440.2667511-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> References: <20251110185440.2667511-1-hca@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjUxMTA4MDAxOCBTYWx0ZWRfXzFi6K/HSS2tp 134pPiQDkFTLWKFziOKxDiigGtLHtuG7kiez1S+aMPeiF8+21kwsluM8J51U17CuwJlF3pb1QQh 3rTmfj7QmCdJAk6KHxCsEdu0qLMhvvjOPR91f+9caECB/XIo2abWnZe7J89ruKzf+7A2CidL1wd 1fAPXWhHeZMrdaORIIAwNaJiJ8hVIq249ZZ/fKrcB6uUXK91sX3s2goOvhpvB/nK3+SLXCsM6U0 qVGw2S1R24nPDuLtUpNBVLEluovhOJvb/B9y4a/82Al1ByDOaZGjmJFBqsVWixyc2bZABR1J+gf fffjefH74MoEsb1oi6GSkdHybL0A4X6zxWfU83kfpgzbJRwUskG4ISvVCi912643pDg+b7tPYWx e3fvSemUn6AnkBr1xltFrn1bbQVxnw== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=GcEaXAXL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=691234f6 cx=c_pps a=5BHTudwdYE3Te8bg5FgnPg==:117 a=5BHTudwdYE3Te8bg5FgnPg==:17 a=6UeiqGixMTsA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=3qFtz8xY5qhfeabdUIUA:9 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 0n3oG5FfdPMu-ZR2Crpgv-LkGMqtUBob X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 0n3oG5FfdPMu-ZR2Crpgv-LkGMqtUBob X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1121,Hydra:6.1.9,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2025-11-10_07,2025-11-10_02,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2510240000 definitions=main-2511080018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" kvm_s390_handle_lpsw() make use of the psw_compat_t type even though the code has nothing to do with CONFIG_COMPAT, for which the type is supposed to be used. Use psw32_t instead. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens --- arch/s390/kvm/priv.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c index 9a71b6e00948..0b14d894f38a 100644 --- a/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/priv.c @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ int is_valid_psw(psw_t *psw) int kvm_s390_handle_lpsw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { psw_t *gpsw =3D &vcpu->arch.sie_block->gpsw; - psw_compat_t new_psw; + psw32_t new_psw; u64 addr; int rc; u8 ar; --=20 2.48.1