From nobody Mon Feb 9 04:46:47 2026 Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F42B2405ED for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 15:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.50 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762527730; cv=none; b=XWbypYbi1eQ7APXSXgRy4F2kOebbzz7QW+47hMf4fq9FUB5o5fsteWb7CR5AVpcJG/8TsoRhJhV6fEtPcFH8/pWUsi2SpGoA1ZpkFjuwYDTnGxBrb/5pSIBwzryAFf3vHZKd0be4+U6YY0ah75/8z3QYEg3+U5WwVBU9y09rqpo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762527730; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/MyQgTeg/kRKghyemlvvfpC1rLwcUH1vky5ONwwjHpI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Sra98PIp/sWviW1xxzViBHpRtqjD8VNP+/WBY9s2olkpmsuEhMAvIzlUk6gR4+pSEBdAhzgd/Q0oB/zppMG3LNWLfB7hnbfDCsZVDNSrZNABljW9NEW086IgUu1RepnkfpuMmyAR+/hF7eWeNg/6zYIXcYeeZuWjQxr9srynsA0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=SjTBB9p3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="SjTBB9p3" Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-477632cc932so3742575e9.3 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 07:02:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1762527726; x=1763132526; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=vyt/356haOFVo0WC/XQ0zOlNsdbCiUi9taT5WCt+m6s=; b=SjTBB9p3ApA94Ogdsmtjr6vhVgoTneODzXq7zF+3A6kts6/LoX8ICZOxq/puzgelO8 REboWuZ6JzCeGUn/HwvYPcNcTvrXjSC5smKWE2cdw7HfqujJPmIMOz288c53uBOXSYKh CHGQNfk3JvdWRohJ029SIKihy57tnTreYg07bZ2M/Q0qlBW015wC/Abzv0l3VVzsx3iM RgWxChTkxqKCLg6nc8qii7eqLIKLTB7p2Xf60xpbeaU6Q1zAw0FDI5kMXj8hxNkprt0u daDO1qMyjElSMoFB9KbdfJA92LRwF/aqyGhMnzTXt0Z4F8wjgd3bMy/HnkjQDXgMgCvh RYig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762527726; x=1763132526; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=vyt/356haOFVo0WC/XQ0zOlNsdbCiUi9taT5WCt+m6s=; b=U2QpCyEbAS3a+DdqvY9qV2uAh96N8K1SexqtRIrXMT1sYC6eyTgUkJO5mfcSSZBkya fvA306bO/TfapjsgMUNBnrZc3XiypqugIOiDpxMtD9WjYOTQuGSC6Fyfnzbbg3FyYdqO ZKotTqWnxS+Pn2+cJEred4CBkP9lCn17udi4S18aGOy/Kq1uAezZALK2tqWx083sh+2z 79kjJ9z44UZVdMptDPypMWgtBQmtzch9Zz5y2JqHM63rfa0IBEsGD6ILYGl8t1TcHOOG 58DiAQkTfldU52aR3fi/caPn0L7JJN4FOdJGgefTYhvcQO8b1fpD5sGHixlHYv7lBaYA uROg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxf/uQ3fuACakD8fO+5xk3t3z9cXz6mj9FUTQ0zM3qwkPHOu/X9 CRiuaphjoYvWo6TY7unwBYTM77RTU5MBT/o0h2/ETTRTLoFCFdGJM4zucfkOhs8AV238/Nl69Kx gRqWi X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncteQT+kl68P4JKBcndeU0FYHElX4KAno/4kFMSyVFY6a9YLsbPJLkIOefd1HPQ F6M+uyG9WhbMtFaSa+aSeCmrz5AUqophjrs592DqUmLWT5HquHzWWYZmTgbECWWo7PjTwpQdIt4 dcEcMoLlHDaizC55S8+V+LbHvLrqmczAW5oX8qZ5B7vcuNgjDtXgYVd514ILtChL8eQ6usBl6bV mmy/SllUtVdEe2i8Y8tEyMqE0MqUDzyP3/xLAXrGrrgcYKCxHP1rEMQ9bFVJtUXNaVH/EkddCbA 3Gh0XrSGNqb2iONTiWyep2eXwMiZiZ0ZAM6lEv492yfcngxZ6wFy7kOJ5tJuLhucAXbdUrnAnMV zm9iciyBoLUL+/seKH2j553H8PS7QM1IRlPZgwaBPV0gWX44/eA14gVAocgbJLP51Jb4k69Jfm+ ANVYqOoD2e4XuYQBZelBX9caVm X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH5Ey9B0iwSNCwyc1V8tclibBQXC7NnuyOaWnZdTUkdNZ9mMv2vosr2W3a789JDeZcYYQKCgw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5813:b0:477:5c45:8117 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4776bcc98bbmr17320205e9.41.1762527724463; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 07:02:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a00:6d43:105:c401:e307:1a37:2e76:ce91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-42ac675ca52sm5777830f8f.25.2025.11.07.07.02.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 07:02:03 -0800 (PST) From: Marco Crivellari To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Marco Crivellari , Michal Hocko , Saurav Kashyap , Javed Hasan , GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com, "James E . J . Bottomley" , "Martin K . Petersen" Subject: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: bnx2fc: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 16:01:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20251107150155.267651-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1 In-Reply-To: <20251107150155.267651-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> References: <20251107150155.267651-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API. alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND. This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues, allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they=E2=80=99re needed= and reducing noise when CPUs are isolated. This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in: commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq") commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag") This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified. With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND), any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn=E2=80=99t explicitly specify WQ_UNB= OUND must now use WQ_PERCPU. Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will become the implicit default. Suggested-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari --- drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc= _fcoe.c index 58da993251e9..0f68739d380a 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/bnx2fc/bnx2fc_fcoe.c @@ -2695,7 +2695,7 @@ static int __init bnx2fc_mod_init(void) if (rc) goto detach_ft; =20 - bnx2fc_wq =3D alloc_workqueue("bnx2fc", 0, 0); + bnx2fc_wq =3D alloc_workqueue("bnx2fc", WQ_PERCPU, 0); if (!bnx2fc_wq) { rc =3D -ENOMEM; goto release_bt; --=20 2.51.1