From nobody Sun Feb 8 04:33:34 2026 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392FD2B9B9 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.44 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762525028; cv=none; b=KWyTH3qRrbOcCEQm3cOdl4q4AZUVR1zwcQXDVISYRZnWO3ZktRAD6PJtxjPEnqRYLnBPsJREpXzIe0Fs640Rudv3fNaOdw5l6sAh4dNvRR2RY7TU+8sQ+OujjjQXea/aUaRBRhYbuVWhI6YNbz6TtRdDueG/J9JTA2xQYv2Zh84= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762525028; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZDojvFpwkc86Vneggax/ZOVs6WBS1eA7tZfZEwxALkE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=RpJfIqnlELm00RJlfIwMk85ltDksIY1zm3+gWGJGbuJNS1ZZeml0NzGlSoe7xTQumJpO5N+bBnhZZNffwfDocwBkh45len6feijD8oHt94Bc27xsGahI0S/4wQLGpsgBQN5ZmwGhO0+bEYqGNg8ytO6D6Oybem1OA5ulStcDRRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=aSFVdkpm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.44 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="aSFVdkpm" Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-429c2f6a580so746101f8f.1 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 06:17:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1762525023; x=1763129823; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=mzsi+dNp+T2knF7qr9XbCjPuamEIJ82dLXer8FWdVBk=; b=aSFVdkpm7QvfbNXYT6eViUVAlkqSBEJZlsWDJxJ/sA2ussZRBv7Si+KPjRABRiAZ18 vdZntKcx8kSJ+KwPBIWyJ6z7W+jsfrLj8aU19sj4uxuRLv+f+MTM9vdlh1Dzieud35XZ grnvYr4JHPItt7jk9qLxTkOgMUuI4KmDk/r/oOQingPJmN0WreRYXlyToxXDi6btGMMJ KDfDkZwkDkl/2HHGxVKLCP2/zDTm8bXLaLM9szLQqvs0UmdwITc07SlEyAOUM3ngN/zs TDBmAP3vnuOuHR13TSnjk2DcK5K9yjGCIVlSYiBMr6lZ4cDSHBC99i4Nr0kkL9hucjl3 jC+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762525023; x=1763129823; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=mzsi+dNp+T2knF7qr9XbCjPuamEIJ82dLXer8FWdVBk=; b=DHuE2uSpoez1CtEgqkO7qR2nmyWUAc8H9QCGDBd3wrUkbmbXVeSel2kLzPhV/XLG+x K0ZWulJvPq0yfo3GzXWfZYnphZJhwZGGhEhsg/EZ/DHfmLPL6xUYukvv0rOQgc35XXbP OZwg61CGwOYwXhpTPB5oibeMuUt4wnA0Ld7MhuGaqloSFr50XGvZd7ba8zzVzpKq5neQ guqXfZ5upMF6ruuaMNJap1bX9LlAQChyvtORbVOuQqSD+WzVJ8wET20B/qcGg0XUvawz hDQZUvkYVLkr6tfpKQMQ88T1C8zK545g0DdsKlqAbJ3o8pNvq86Ckx59oBK3R/4JxKAU MuvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLmdwL1Iub20D4iyRwOUokY/TqKBaRkCVYLhUTj0taouKpbpVa Q0cOeyISUq2zhTFhbjhZnZUxuIMYoMMklYIzYItOdr5NItOq1SBxpBFIr3Ar2Xy9X3tqs7/HFmz nWAne X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctm3EGhuGKzJJb9QUN6Dkw4uTi7SqO48ir/GfUFUDHVorQyoWGhLt9TBmoD5Kt CAyKQMEmVttnSveco95gEH5hmcFCn9lrsp+jX5l1xRldDdI1tmcaGk9YsayfVPm/Mc68ERJH1bz LyGVynfu671EcgEW7E31yJJA4Wo35nJv3dwB0HRCCsMFSe4R1h3sAKMrT80S1h5cK7NOQ1wxdQd O+mhG9jNPWqPWRPaedprCHIembWFZwX+eoN+3UfymzZa7QIlBMzs2MXDNRkk7EPGjNkw9yQrmWf 1ycGTh06XgLoSTJB0d/vehxU79gH8+MpqwgPk7Qpu2EZmwd126BXdAHMnrDmyJuU02zABIHRlog h4SicCj36/r5jxtyzhHZdHSZfSsiAOUo4S4kQ4Z6UlQo6rxQHa7ppIH4l5f1PLm7QadFMBeUnjB 2zEg9pHUUtjjcVs/cw8UycYC7k X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFH0LXgWeIJgtl+gQta4fjJfleBNDxC0sB4rnU1I/EiNKg4zTlVBSSwvX1AJqwzlKSKz64XVQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2dc9:b0:427:928:787f with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-42ae5888a46mr3117979f8f.21.1762525023274; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 06:17:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a00:6d43:105:c401:e307:1a37:2e76:ce91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-42ab6a7ad67sm5989764f8f.0.2025.11.07.06.17.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 06:17:02 -0800 (PST) From: Marco Crivellari To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Marco Crivellari , Michal Hocko , Ulf Hansson Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 15:16:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20251107141654.226947-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API. alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND. This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues, allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they=E2=80=99re needed= and reducing noise when CPUs are isolated. This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in: commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq") commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag") This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified. With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND), any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn=E2=80=99t explicitly specify WQ_UNB= OUND must now use WQ_PERCPU. Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will become the implicit default. Suggested-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari --- drivers/mmc/core/block.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c index c0ffe0817fd4..6a651ddccf28 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/core/block.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/block.c @@ -3275,7 +3275,8 @@ static int mmc_blk_probe(struct mmc_card *card) mmc_fixup_device(card, mmc_blk_fixups); =20 card->complete_wq =3D alloc_workqueue("mmc_complete", - WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI, 0); + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_HIGHPRI | WQ_PERCPU, + 0); if (!card->complete_wq) { pr_err("Failed to create mmc completion workqueue"); return -ENOMEM; --=20 2.51.1