From nobody Sun Feb 8 11:59:31 2026 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com (mail-wr1-f50.google.com [209.85.221.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C7222DF140 for ; Fri, 7 Nov 2025 13:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.50 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762522046; cv=none; b=nO6GO4f0OtXiyGNnKew8PGJFFVN8Hp1LGtoiH4yRaWaJA/6LBHFILnM/bO0fXH+p+USExE2YWbKXSpc1RV7pvSxVM5sNjqeQiyc0qA8mNv2jm8M7UkJcYA5PcHM+Q7uSlFYym93KKkhVQQxdf0d+0DcBr992zofPEvyVKkLf8L0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762522046; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xOgIgUMI+BwDiOq38R4O8HSLT6TrQvpp/zCzKFcAC5M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GDMV9e/tDzS/5JIM4qpo1H7gmwK4uHDLduJRLZQRX8h5BVqQPJpQ6xtahRQw4B7cFTn5hT+DQ2WYnxSKZPzKl698D3mcrnNGN8RJY07cHLpiii9mUo45etyV2mXDWTq4EuGI4lr3TKVArDO83bjc9+Pda0nqxyAxd/rJWJlw0gg= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=Fjst45OB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.50 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Fjst45OB" Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-426f1574a14so460290f8f.3 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:27:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=google; t=1762522040; x=1763126840; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gpDBdHac69yHdTxfS3btmvWgT1JTkvIR7tXnz5+sQMg=; b=Fjst45OBz35+4Bm29+PhAJ7YQZmD2SYiwbQ/UXlJDFH30ESQ2Ao83E3ervY7mhqzLD CIiKqEQ1iZq6yMKqUwtmUEfknXQxMs/3ZQGzLgqsVBAGKfUC4CtCc0U2GQCg+ntn8hLP 8GNQe0SdW00QkMOhlAKEWPymraLckuZarBm3lBlRVBx5ttT75/hHe8Qwv5/vpehTD2lJ 7jTrIR78ILxK8zULOBRDB4capkWnpXH7kzrNTwfrDG0+yR+Jv95NOtdOh2Rai8SnrSyC Cb8AIVQ3q+vuegvMPTl09EBIaH8eeqb+Xqo2OQTKtaCNmcUJzU0d59lNhXaTQtb8eAzH 2ffQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1762522040; x=1763126840; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=gpDBdHac69yHdTxfS3btmvWgT1JTkvIR7tXnz5+sQMg=; b=Wuomr10HmPhk5KDhZPK87ZFj3EGM7sEokhkd5eLJitEXe0Cqre3hA0IL+S2mNb9Oqa 1Dn6/WuRG59SwVIImyD1yqxGtbzmB+TcIkpMGQ+61xvJiP/riaEoOHvMZdcwQrio9XrY N/nyWVB0TtY4zouvGHPC/JnTwA5clxN18/rwh6iph3zkngIfqQtv8pF+1ApZGJSiKqhJ Vy3wCyVabm0b9nmrPgjE0epU6b47S2calt31V9sMMIO4xdm1zTDzFTziLgqsDuLlCVSN jNUE1hx8smcVAvDd7/v2Vo1DrhgbPvc7tW/kNnRP3ywalbCC4Mz8/SQqp3/gEwIkV+qh +Rvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQ10Qdm+PpSdXU38MP4nu/ddeuRb+MwrzXRIa8f2VV8ElXSjmA QpqfBhPyvgqBvyKXlRoWmR+S3beAPh5mrKeyglriBEOtvJmwvwpYs4MscDQL7mPTs3OeCkwvC3i 5zj3m X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvLh3armgP2iXD/lhUDTlIlsLXi1zBeOXHBAXPbQBrkcJ8WA9CR3bcDNrpWGbO UV5/Yc6P7hwq81tQykZXmgSq8rcBDz46wB5gJpL3fLMBAdzL6XWjFtijy0GUR9tedsPF0wwtlGQ TfwpoJ2D5BHDZ2A5brBvv606vnR0tob/Jhz9HfdsOTLLyrN7M3aCg2vu2FOgZAUshZgkkqI1I7v nVuw1FAi5xvl/aQsIKPSTgil0TbLYmAanUorr/vr5KYkpxB4v5PoiMhufV+TYbUd0dOy3QnBNWD r4s+SUoOWnRGV63FYg7M6PVqzXIDUk9FuHKBwe4DBxxKr+0hLMWutRPalpF463X7gp9XsxBRaDy W0RfdqmVkEPzfHRoURYmKQrtcGlKH/iwE8iExzqqbIidaXdOq3pZj4rB56v2vFFLoEEFNJ//9hM MN1Cpq7Tu+QTAIcXDzzHIzFmIA X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGXoQU2aKwjfhm9zFbD1wEw86QWRNpD8ObJ2BhZ4tbaRurd6UaGdy791fVPME62ucuMSvHuLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5d06:0:b0:427:921:8985 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-42ae5ac206bmr2453743f8f.40.1762522040253; Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a00:6d43:105:c401:e307:1a37:2e76:ce91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ffacd0b85a97d-42b29e4b9bdsm907220f8f.32.2025.11.07.05.27.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 07 Nov 2025 05:27:18 -0800 (PST) From: Marco Crivellari To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org Cc: Tejun Heo , Lai Jiangshan , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Marco Crivellari , Michal Hocko , "K . Y . Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Wei Liu , Dexuan Cui Subject: [PATCH] mshv_eventfd: add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 14:27:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20251107132712.182499-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Currently if a user enqueues a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND. This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API. alloc_workqueue() treats all queues as per-CPU by default, while unbound workqueues must opt-in via WQ_UNBOUND. This default is suboptimal: most workloads benefit from unbound queues, allowing the scheduler to place worker threads where they=E2=80=99re needed= and reducing noise when CPUs are isolated. This continues the effort to refactor workqueue APIs, which began with the introduction of new workqueues and a new alloc_workqueue flag in: commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq") commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag") This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified. With the introduction of the WQ_PERCPU flag (equivalent to !WQ_UNBOUND), any alloc_workqueue() caller that doesn=E2=80=99t explicitly specify WQ_UNB= OUND must now use WQ_PERCPU. Once migration is complete, WQ_UNBOUND can be removed and unbound will become the implicit default. Suggested-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Marco Crivellari Reviewed-by: Easwar Hariharan --- drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c index 806674722868..2a80af1d610a 100644 --- a/drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_eventfd.c @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static void mshv_irqfd_release(struct mshv_partition *p= t) =20 int mshv_irqfd_wq_init(void) { - irqfd_cleanup_wq =3D alloc_workqueue("mshv-irqfd-cleanup", 0, 0); + irqfd_cleanup_wq =3D alloc_workqueue("mshv-irqfd-cleanup", WQ_PERCPU, 0); if (!irqfd_cleanup_wq) return -ENOMEM; =20 --=20 2.51.1