From nobody Fri Dec 19 14:21:09 2025 Received: from out-174.mta1.migadu.com (out-174.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97FF1E32D3 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2025 01:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.174 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762391523; cv=none; b=MvusNFLETXQIOTflzWKVcVfWCX4+NCWZ3TOu+3H2gnCQh60lew9TuGHABPSLZTEbUDpBCkH/xPcDZcayg0qYN2Vbedz/BzFn0TJ7MIu84ayp0NqWhi8qBGOLhz5uF8k6RS5pXmb8o1RCoBqCI8CWLJ1nsexm/RgTSM/aBYbPcZE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762391523; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9J+GQsabqWq0SzdkzjfkY0+YAySvu0mHZIJKBIsN2SA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=qN40HcLXQ7wcWUQUuB3m8tpOp8km7Z1UX5R8KlARmK1hcKb0IEd4xCVvAccdlErouYYb7+70Vr27VmaFVTs4ErVijw4VNn61WbdaY/ttvo8w3n6dZwcHu1LRM7s/jI+UVmls/ZV3yWBU3dtSRAmjz2FqJ5AzS7FDz0sJUJJMGdk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=wKQVOzwV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="wKQVOzwV" X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1762391518; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RPVVr6R6/R4uLeTWW79sJbo88M16VGLNR2YUAhLQNnQ=; b=wKQVOzwVi0/utG6jYyilcGaNEV8gKQ+7poZ3cd+AWZBcUYMeIlr0cppl/GVPnq8PWloN6j k9JAVyGRJGcpK8Srjaz6wucTcNHCpuN3df54802qkV1H9CV6dnwwH0thHq8uHO1PXqkmhQ uGSk2RWJPGRESTdbWTqQ0mppAb9Dv74= From: Yuntao Wang To: Rob Herring , Saravana Kannan Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yuntao Wang Subject: [PATCH] of: address: Remove the incorrect and misleading comment Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 09:10:35 +0800 Message-ID: <20251106011035.166356-1-yuntao.wang@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The of_bus_default_match() function appears to have been copied from of_bus_default_flags_match() with some modifications. However, the comment was left unchanged and still describes the behavior of of_bus_default_flags_match(), it is incorrect and misleading, remove it. Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang --- drivers/of/address.c | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c index f0f8f0dd191c..4034d798c55a 100644 --- a/drivers/of/address.c +++ b/drivers/of/address.c @@ -328,10 +328,6 @@ static int of_bus_default_flags_match(struct device_no= de *np) =20 static int of_bus_default_match(struct device_node *np) { - /* - * Check for presence first since of_bus_n_addr_cells() will warn when - * walking parent nodes. - */ return of_property_present(np, "#address-cells"); } =20 --=20 2.51.0