From nobody Mon Feb 9 04:03:49 2026 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 546E9348440; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761745977; cv=none; b=LuYLi0CtqoJg4AU/uX1ifyEI1wR9UGNpbzOnu/lQJtlrv4LTxC5Mf7ADQSV9Txfv/3lADiHn4ZEAe3Xg05+Rv3UGu9agzFa5GmU+tjX1382eg5Jkbd4cYfDQjw4i6hwCg9EtrrjDAacoCpMB32Qz3CTxpQWFydT6CeD8dIBx9Zw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761745977; c=relaxed/simple; bh=15E47hyvmQPrJWkj4LYQAs5VLKJP00bGmfww35DXTcY=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=aM3yDVUUKwWtdMw+FNeiWLhbqMzGQa/40IiiFq2iWHSEZ+X+yimsD3WJ+rQ4wfcr577cWiDupUSkvDLapLqQ58CZ4V85ivxLYULZmdU3eIO+JTfa5DHawpWv6O18ekFle8eb+1y20FpdCBPjoeWOocL4NR46AkIxPNnWizbKQIM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=Gq+jSTUI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="Gq+jSTUI" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEA56C0DBC0; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31054606E8; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 13:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 424AD117F80F6; Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:52:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1761745973; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=nw7naf5mx2NiW6CLXgmCEx5KgfTcyto6pFTnj3WONc8=; b=Gq+jSTUINZ6XlvlSrzSTxwqdQLzlsNjbS2OYxyl+ZIK8hc7aZGNKHS4lJ7Q12aUYlT9Cx8 gHj3X3KG8Au2wX7qZv+7lU1RGPkc/hWMBfKQy7jw60CpTyqCrd9n6RvQPFaP8AaVxKvr0U 5YuKlzUnuws8CricpWVrwz70NKzcyqrwYoEIqASM0Sv35X86Ypt3hiQFHhkCcduszVW8Le bsF9YJ2dPYhc7vcMFa3pv5dNXUPcGLIoUWQH+gq/F1eCwInc0jpush/pkV7/H+299QbYBZ DvmiyGjADjQrir41ek5APwAAI/9ufFwt1CvBC4DuqRtZgIKgzjN89MXfcHHo8A== From: "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:52:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/15] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Release resources when swap fails Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20251029-xsk-v6-7-5a63a64dff98@bootlin.com> References: <20251029-xsk-v6-0-5a63a64dff98@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20251029-xsk-v6-0-5a63a64dff98@bootlin.com> To: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?= , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Alexis Lothore , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 testapp_validate_traffic() doesn't release the sockets and the umem created by the threads if the test isn't currently in its last step. Thus, if the swap_xsk_resources() fails before the last step, the created resources aren't cleaned up. Clean the sockets and the umem in case of swap_xsk_resources() failure. Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation) --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftes= ts/bpf/test_xsk.c index 84b724731e26d0c7e67131ec1bd562e223d3d09d..8fe75845d7a6aa5342229fa419f= cbaa411ae9e70 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c @@ -1866,8 +1866,13 @@ int testapp_xdp_prog_cleanup(struct test_spec *test) if (testapp_validate_traffic(test)) return TEST_FAILURE; =20 - if (swap_xsk_resources(test)) + if (swap_xsk_resources(test)) { + clean_sockets(test, test->ifobj_rx); + clean_sockets(test, test->ifobj_tx); + clean_umem(test, test->ifobj_rx, test->ifobj_tx); return TEST_FAILURE; + } + return testapp_validate_traffic(test); } =20 --=20 2.51.0