From nobody Sun Feb 8 02:42:06 2026 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99F6534C134 for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:55:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761332135; cv=none; b=eY3Z1izVqE88lEB4RKXv3+Jbxupb27uVOxjiHRDaUXkImI43E7PxXXfycPbTu0jZKWF6zzZOwq6Pc0h0n9FTFxY0gTKnG4pSBjeVFuAvq/llAAwLghPt8oRuxrYu7dubVuUyJkryNbpWqzk24UU/B6JHL4PBJglu6Kl1aeCi0/o= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761332135; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Au2y6QuL/1OptsUjz9Vi4Quqje7xjMfFkThB1fdAqvA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=ozdDDNuZnP8j9U9iXLAQCq0Fw/uWttcw7N8xIF7NeuAOJAQlCNxlYgXWzQNuRmcq5hKOMVz2Ecckws0S4PcpJrqDyTpUZ0aKFDtyZS0jbOu1/5fEKch/rVs1X4sDV1Y3J7S0YPfyDUA5w8A1FaeUy8+teTmEYbIDXRrIm6z23Xs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=aBElSGu/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="aBElSGu/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1761332131; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zh2IWrtmuEEEWOhFl4HGUxrir13Dlskm07kP1/wIoac=; b=aBElSGu/oeJ2NwvuC8YJ+ItN6JT5PW4U8hrscPrhxAf8lcYKAcvqNSGAn6oSm0ZlDbnVaw Ly3f8PJbAQP+0Rq5sqsyaLn1l/8NfWS0BWQ66JD5c3OhVUvuBBLk3H8DriBND/tPGdIT8K Cd02ye8cb1ZUQW/akixKzSJucOr2658= Received: from mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-512-XT0nEk2sPvyUyZwXNOowPA-1; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:55:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XT0nEk2sPvyUyZwXNOowPA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: XT0nEk2sPvyUyZwXNOowPA_1761332124 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F0FA19733CC; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ShadowPeak.redhat.com (unknown [10.44.33.192]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9FD19540E9; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 18:55:18 +0000 (UTC) From: Petr Oros To: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Donald Hunter , Jiri Pirko , Vadim Fedorenko , Milena Olech , Arkadiusz Kubalewski , Petr Oros , Ivan Vecera , Michal Michalik , netdev@vger.kernel.org (open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) Cc: mschmidt@redhat.com Subject: [PATCH net] dpll: spec: add missing module-name and clock-id to pin-get reply Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 20:55:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20251024185512.363376-1-poros@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" The dpll.yaml spec incorrectly omitted module-name and clock-id from the pin-get operation reply specification, even though the kernel DPLL implementation has always included these attributes in pin-get responses since the initial implementation. This spec inconsistency caused issues with the C YNL code generator. The generated dpll_pin_get_rsp structure was missing these fields. Fix the spec by adding module-name and clock-id to the pin-attrs reply specification to match the actual kernel behavior. Fixes: 3badff3a25d8 ("dpll: spec: Add Netlink spec in YAML") Signed-off-by: Petr Oros Reviewed-by: Ivan Vecera --- Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/= specs/dpll.yaml index cafb4ec20447e1..80728f6f9bc876 100644 --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/dpll.yaml @@ -605,6 +605,8 @@ operations: reply: &pin-attrs attributes: - id + - module-name + - clock-id - board-label - panel-label - package-label --=20 2.51.0