From nobody Thu Oct 2 02:15:03 2025 Received: from smtpout-04.galae.net (smtpout-04.galae.net [185.171.202.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A00EF30DEAE; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758725419; cv=none; b=JryMDKXBfwCH5QGxAILpbZWqQ9jDtAmo0YVkHCwRS/eSXUnOTx2Un6QM/R4YI6bPEqkSF+2O5aMMGUJPqG4uUpT0CtIYMHY1Xc5+VOZiIi3YTcPK/EJV7v6IAFgdJ2fY6eOX6Fvr6RmZ9hd1tBePt+X4PJy7m36FIDEw+Wm28yw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758725419; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Aq4WSStk0rooKIc9npdEwOo7UWQ2PGDevEB4+t8QRUw=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=fjD02stM8lixDXBY/mR9xVztCbXQgXZS+uX7S4qQs68A9WvYjkvo4/LaxXx9dNCqEL6ooSmJp0vD7t3XgdksUswsGwWHhI5yHMVD8Ydjwcx+jEZc46QCSXdIaueLPve+5h5RDEKERXoADR+AnrBQd++7j6pAhbshz4uzyQv4qVY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=DnjMFKCv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.171.202.116 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="DnjMFKCv" Received: from smtpout-01.galae.net (smtpout-01.galae.net [212.83.139.233]) by smtpout-04.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42CF4C011C1; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:49:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.galae.net (mail.galae.net [212.83.136.155]) by smtpout-01.galae.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 707F660634; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:50:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 97231102F1972; Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:50:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=dkim; t=1758725415; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=NXLxX7aIyZUMbZFpVGJXKN2UBcI9+3K+7D1mGbTAaUI=; b=DnjMFKCvzCwF9iEbVd9EYcC7HrvoJDzXp3s9r8DNoDDS45rKtxaMmvqx/hFdMxAPwz2+zQ /GyY/BWKrmJGWbvrqpfylY0F5zs7k9WZm2Wg4cl5K8vTbXmhIqYE5pbjGefLDRV4Pc55sf 7rteo2530USfoI6Q1n2l/nbOC8K2fe8s588HSdsVJ5PyxSLZ5g/p44yno7o8q89cwHOj2I Wi5AhMpDXpOAb+a9LAdhKY+7+Ej0ti9HdydyAg3f9XhISgrZCjOjrYYsx1aXJGafP02S8b wxv2NosLJAWfs3jK1mxbD4DWT9WV0aiN5Dq8hqekx5pRcytfBvNC7HbPWvAoqQ== From: "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:49:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 06/15] selftests/bpf: test_xsk: Wrap test clean-up in functions Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20250924-xsk-v4-6-20e57537b876@bootlin.com> References: <20250924-xsk-v4-0-20e57537b876@bootlin.com> In-Reply-To: <20250924-xsk-v4-0-20e57537b876@bootlin.com> To: =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?= , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Mykola Lysenko , Shuah Khan , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Alexis Lothore , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation)" X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 The clean-up done at the end of a test in __testapp_validate_traffic() isn't wrapped in a function. It isn't convenient if we want to use it somewhere else in the code. Wrap the clean-up in two new functions : the first deletes the sockets, the second releases the umem. Signed-off-by: Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation) --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------= ---- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c b/tools/testing/selftes= ts/bpf/test_xsk.c index d7cb2821469c62abd0d532821e836336a2177eb5..84b724731e26d0c7e67131ec1bd= 562e223d3d09d 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_xsk.c @@ -1679,6 +1679,27 @@ static void xsk_attach_xdp_progs(struct test_spec *t= est, struct ifobject *ifobj_ xsk_reattach_xdp(ifobj_tx, test->xdp_prog_tx, test->xskmap_tx, test->mod= e); } =20 +static void clean_sockets(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj) +{ + u32 i; + + if (!ifobj || !test) + return; + + for (i =3D 0; i < test->nb_sockets; i++) + xsk_socket__delete(ifobj->xsk_arr[i].xsk); +} + +static void clean_umem(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj1, st= ruct ifobject *ifobj2) +{ + if (!ifobj1) + return; + + testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj1); + if (ifobj2 && !ifobj2->shared_umem) + testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj2); +} + static int __testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobj= ect *ifobj1, struct ifobject *ifobj2) { @@ -1734,18 +1755,9 @@ static int __testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_sp= ec *test, struct ifobject *i pthread_join(t0, NULL); =20 if (test->total_steps =3D=3D test->current_step || test->fail) { - u32 i; - - if (ifobj2) - for (i =3D 0; i < test->nb_sockets; i++) - xsk_socket__delete(ifobj2->xsk_arr[i].xsk); - - for (i =3D 0; i < test->nb_sockets; i++) - xsk_socket__delete(ifobj1->xsk_arr[i].xsk); - - testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj1); - if (ifobj2 && !ifobj2->shared_umem) - testapp_clean_xsk_umem(ifobj2); + clean_sockets(test, ifobj1); + clean_sockets(test, ifobj2); + clean_umem(test, ifobj1, ifobj2); } =20 if (test->fail) --=20 2.51.0