From nobody Sat Oct 4 22:37:10 2025 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [117.135.210.5]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3192D13D8A4; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 02:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754965079; cv=none; b=WTqOw0+yzh4u+e5kY/riohybXIjwJkM/im88Zh28zovPsiAJv8IOH5Rnlto9HKZNSa5N8OuLaj7a3ez/pnVWCgzjmz5PsO/DyjYwuzzW4/gj2pQd5kvx0JfmzOvcQpmUc8TbPA3VKXsHBL1byQN3NZF+fMyB5oyel+AfU6Gh2Sc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754965079; c=relaxed/simple; bh=p8rIpSOUd8wR9bvs3gGvqLbx8KrOSm2aQbTqFSvf1ow=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=aOGDro/5DI92Mxdp8NQHqYCBp6pGpFUlFg6fq5t/+tZs2LmXvJ7Brkzpahrbr/UNeHCbqOJ4DiTTxegcDXp0CHGezr8n3EqRdNyptf1epnY7/SpHLCWk5GLiTyiqbLujWnqSkgx5wiOa+EM1xOW76pOYu2DaFOPhm3PmKoknpPA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=I43MsbSk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="I43MsbSk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; bh=3Q OTaZ52O6+1gNzGEBm2ulp2/tQEcCZJjcbyg+KHPhc=; b=I43MsbSkTvZEomIfuq 6ZW0k9NAiD5PHmmOqTmxZzD0Pa7BB4zRfMtYHcz3hw/KEof9n2EdEruK0BDxtsJi HWl0Y/U3gIdcwsti9e9g7F9KlUM7PeuGoYwzUFOAtdO9bfhNaXk1N97/P3YCbnt3 KgfH2m6WsAoODz7+BWJ7c1DBs= Received: from liubaolin-VMware-Virtual-Platform.localdomain (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-1 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wD3939EpJpoxPx8BQ--.48488S2; Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:17:42 +0800 (CST) From: Baolin Liu To: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Baolin Liu Subject: [PATCH v1] ext4: fix incorrect function name in comment Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 10:17:09 +0800 Message-Id: <20250812021709.1120716-1-liubaolin12138@163.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CM-TRANSID: _____wD3939EpJpoxPx8BQ--.48488S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvdXoW7WryUuryUGr43JrW3ZF1DKFg_yoW3twc_W3 WkXws5J3ZxJFn3AF4rJ3yYqrn29w1fWr1UZ395JF43Z3yYvan5Cwn8XFyUAr98WF1jgrW5 CrnrXFW3AFyxXjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU8kwIDUUUUU== X-CM-SenderInfo: xolxutxrol0iasrtmqqrwthudrp/1tbiMRanymiaoBXO1gAAsV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Baolin Liu The comment mentions block_write_begin(), but the actual function called is ext4_block_write_begin(). Fix the comment to match the real function name. Signed-off-by: Baolin Liu Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index ed54c4d0f2f9..b0e3814f8502 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -3155,7 +3155,7 @@ static int ext4_da_write_begin(const struct kiocb *io= cb, folio_unlock(folio); folio_put(folio); /* - * block_write_begin may have instantiated a few blocks + * ext4_block_write_begin may have instantiated a few blocks * outside i_size. Trim these off again. Don't need * i_size_read because we hold inode lock. */ --=20 2.39.2