From nobody Sun Oct 5 10:47:06 2025 Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83285247280 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2025 15:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.178 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754408860; cv=none; b=PkecinhyrO0ZEp3zGb6GXpfh4zv/I2V4YAZYB0tSiKeg6DZfw2EtbJc62Sggz6PhlBg7q5aOz2wjSIRIUWCMsHFZnqJk/jldXMDpHxCATHBmQn+vCi5TzN0vm09FnEb4T7Ud3eBqFEFkjlu3WBTWlS2B9ow9X6dxdqjzhAy/+Mk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1754408860; c=relaxed/simple; bh=r1ZNtVzkV46tgwYdkFFJqca2KpFO/4Xqj8AgnYiL/ao=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=ehc7IxN6RaViJOaFJXm0XPRKfKsHW+p60Vb+UwgX3HmgTfYyOl661zdjsRgaCc+A1Cpfk3n5ZqjflK/i43V+vP8rElNCC5yUUdHffKvdtx2sY69wojOJj6dQ2G+6uf8y83mnZdNfjKh1dOfNOjOl8tgt+3CHu4Rc9p1s6DAQy70= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=OgP3qCME; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OgP3qCME" Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2402774851fso49255365ad.1 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1754408858; x=1755013658; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fBa/zrBHVKKChl/K3snAlz7daAzVsSWKAZ9bPTQlz2g=; b=OgP3qCMEmEFdwcIMePua1q/2c8MXU9kaNcacbUMQlnF2Tp+UFZPHvF2ibI/6L5X5L0 Qp5sw79PB2WnISTIIGc7wHxLAmOHljsUcg4uKw/KtFDddKWkp7lidDnSMZdjN70kxM23 PeKr5nNStS4TaiczhTK8uF5coCOLRLp4bqj3NaT959pjGC8ERK683BWKGSSSZSjKTbWT faLF4eMulvnniWRTEhHQyj86dZZmmuvE5VgtA/hVaXYk+SyY+gn//Okwf0626xQKoCJA k6bcpKE/QQfC2XIBIxRb18122baFMovooV6smimEPb0vPRWGXS0H6tO1VBNxw/QBFYSA co1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1754408858; x=1755013658; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fBa/zrBHVKKChl/K3snAlz7daAzVsSWKAZ9bPTQlz2g=; b=Yvt7Ba3+bq4WKpxjC6eSg/0p97woywtdAPPoanog+1ic84EoVph8BZiyYH46egInyx lCkkXGSx2El4Qrh94VYaJHH1KtVly9Egz2WOYoWjCOEBgGCQOTWRl/hmuXZrDl/K30b3 mx6I0/S0gUhdmp5G742jshJPhrMoIK1HWSz+O/tEgvMHK1PzJtoWt47fgitn1DZsz9qm X0tnlH4rAPwdPQZgGNXgPpyFipWvni9ds8EsYqCu8TfFcJ38EwnktNwzCaWCAbdIsWdI No0QzSCGRzmP0fyAAv2+nYJdo/uCFPVPzQHReLQoq/PpHhiJmLphaCTAr9wiW81F+1K1 T23w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVOcuVKQPJh5REAlstTX6W2LNZbLdheONADjcW6d5F9GbCr0zLzd7Bp20LBKVT/Q7guiBQxtvzFLjvBr1o=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzjxDMUGyVO0UsljTCInbaeoC1JQDJ5U3ySjzcDsGNey+ld1C2F 7MfK+YngHmvceDEHGBOG3Ts7TMRxVCF7UxVZubZCKuX+z+YKNBg66upG X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctcbspCswV2/8ib82eRx34wIZQrFIj/PcggckfAr+Ylf2MBKrCHvLCt+SCkULr dCa6pSIXHTyndaqzE7hR5TVZnbiG+/Uyn+FtLYKXgeaPZxpEpC+oAjF8XnC3pXxT0PCI3DXAZKz NLrBMY47zHsoq9+TP/FYIP4KcUjW95WiKGsINusEPB2uEXa+R0TSbKglciwontDe9zKwIYX4Q6X wUlXVzSR4NxyOpkWvHF87kIUD8H07cwql57gQD1S0vY1lC2ctzYreB8Gu6dx0+XCtA9p1LVvy0g lS+CoNW6Ht0UOvdzXEUuwVKaucPeP6Odq4d8p3PC4fdXY6IUA5svgbqCZCruexASbr/BSRluouh J/PpxaEzJYHeKZNX0n/VEVWKQIdmxlR3b7E+jvkZBhA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGRqosIMPxw9Sw/5Tt3m1euRzAovlSm4EaACj5l52jRzWo9lWCHslnHwghgGcTZRJAIc10QiQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:f652:b0:240:8cec:4823 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2424703a024mr201403575ad.41.1754408857698; Tue, 05 Aug 2025 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manjaro.domain.name ([2401:4900:1c31:41da:bdc2:5f7d:c803:6cd1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-241e8aa9055sm138305345ad.150.2025.08.05.08.47.32 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Aug 2025 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Pranav Tyagi To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, dvhart@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, andrealmeid@igalia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: jann@thejh.net, keescook@chromium.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, Pranav Tyagi Subject: [PATCH v3] futex: don't leak robust_list pointer on exec race Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 21:17:25 +0530 Message-ID: <20250805154725.22031-1-pranav.tyagi03@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" sys_get_robust_list() and compat_get_robust_list() use ptrace_may_access() to check if the calling task is allowed to access another task's robust_list pointer. This check is racy against a concurrent exec() in the target process. During exec(), a task may transition from a non-privileged binary to a privileged one (e.g., setuid binary) and its credentials/memory mappings may change. If get_robust_list() performs ptrace_may_access() before this transition, it may erroneously allow access to sensitive information after the target becomes privileged. A racy access allows an attacker to exploit a window during which ptrace_may_access() passes before a target process transitions to a privileged state via exec(). For example, consider a non-privileged task T that is about to execute a setuid-root binary. An attacker task A calls get_robust_list(T) while T is still unprivileged. Since ptrace_may_access() checks permissions based on current credentials, it succeeds. However, if T begins exec immediately afterwards, it becomes privileged and may change its memory mappings. Because get_robust_list() proceeds to access T->robust_list without synchronizing with exec() it may read user-space pointers from a now-privileged process. This violates the intended post-exec access restrictions and could expose sensitive memory addresses or be used as a primitive in a larger exploit chain. Consequently, the race can lead to unauthorized disclosure of information across privilege boundaries and poses a potential security risk. Take a read lock on signal->exec_update_lock prior to invoking ptrace_may_access() and accessing the robust_list/compat_robust_list. This ensures that the target task's exec state remains stable during the check, allowing for consistent and synchronized validation of credentials. Signed-off-by: Pranav Tyagi Suggested-by: Jann Horn Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1477863998-3298-5-git-send-emai= l-jann@thejh.net/ Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/119 --- changed in v3: - replaced RCU with scoped_guard(rcu) - corrected error return type cast - added IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) for ensuring compatability - removed stray newlines and unnecessary line breaks changed in v2: - improved changelog - helper function for common part of compat and native syscalls kernel/futex/syscalls.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c index 4b6da9116aa6..c342c16d6d00 100644 --- a/kernel/futex/syscalls.c +++ b/kernel/futex/syscalls.c @@ -39,6 +39,52 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(set_robust_list, struct robust_list_head= __user *, head, return 0; } =20 +static void __user *get_robust_list_common(int pid, bool compat) +{ + struct task_struct *p; + void __user *head; + unsigned long ret; + + p =3D current; + + scoped_guard(rcu) { + if (pid) { + p =3D find_task_by_vpid(pid); + if (!p) + return (void __user *)ERR_PTR(-ESRCH); + } + get_task_struct(p); + } + + /* + * Hold exec_update_lock to serialize with concurrent exec() + * so ptrace_may_access() is checked against stable credentials + */ + ret =3D down_read_killable(&p->signal->exec_update_lock); + if (ret) + goto err_put; + + ret =3D -EPERM; + if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) + goto err_unlock; + + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_COMPAT) && compat) + head =3D p->compat_robust_list; + else + head =3D p->robust_list; + + up_read(&p->signal->exec_update_lock); + put_task_struct(p); + + return head; + +err_unlock: + up_read(&p->signal->exec_update_lock); +err_put: + put_task_struct(p); + return (void __user *)ERR_PTR(ret); +} + /** * sys_get_robust_list() - Get the robust-futex list head of a task * @pid: pid of the process [zero for current task] @@ -49,36 +95,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(get_robust_list, int, pid, struct robust_list_head __user * __user *, head_ptr, size_t __user *, len_ptr) { - struct robust_list_head __user *head; - unsigned long ret; - struct task_struct *p; + struct robust_list_head __user *head =3D get_robust_list_common(pid, fals= e); =20 - rcu_read_lock(); - - ret =3D -ESRCH; - if (!pid) - p =3D current; - else { - p =3D find_task_by_vpid(pid); - if (!p) - goto err_unlock; - } - - ret =3D -EPERM; - if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) - goto err_unlock; - - head =3D p->robust_list; - rcu_read_unlock(); + if (IS_ERR(head)) + return PTR_ERR(head); =20 if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr)) return -EFAULT; return put_user(head, head_ptr); - -err_unlock: - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return ret; } =20 long do_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, ktime_t *timeout, @@ -455,36 +479,14 @@ COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE3(get_robust_list, int, pid, compat_uptr_t __user *, head_ptr, compat_size_t __user *, len_ptr) { - struct compat_robust_list_head __user *head; - unsigned long ret; - struct task_struct *p; + struct compat_robust_list_head __user *head =3D get_robust_list_common(pi= d, true); =20 - rcu_read_lock(); - - ret =3D -ESRCH; - if (!pid) - p =3D current; - else { - p =3D find_task_by_vpid(pid); - if (!p) - goto err_unlock; - } - - ret =3D -EPERM; - if (!ptrace_may_access(p, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) - goto err_unlock; - - head =3D p->compat_robust_list; - rcu_read_unlock(); + if (IS_ERR(head)) + return PTR_ERR(head); =20 if (put_user(sizeof(*head), len_ptr)) return -EFAULT; return put_user(ptr_to_compat(head), head_ptr); - -err_unlock: - rcu_read_unlock(); - - return ret; } #endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */ =20 --=20 2.49.0