From nobody Mon Oct 6 01:22:07 2025 Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B37F2B9BA; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 09:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.182 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753610228; cv=none; b=NBUGuhpeUxp0UhaO9Y06SMmJ3JXUylJBs6RGNJPV/DvOsmA8tLpD9Tg1laXzXjGkX9QVgDpjl4+GumTjTLk6JeepVAZiBWvn+wVBCR/KSNcwG767dLDvZdp4Vuujidhrk07FetQv28GYZHxGxNE0lIKykj3lpH/LlXLT4/yRbAI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753610228; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CD/l3tUdwzeZKZupi/sYgTC59oQJFaZAsMCYQNYsVRE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=PooMoJFJ5j6KsyLOEO6fm8gtMh8tKirl0wKENAiYSDJElNtsuOzxGOawdEF2lJq1zVbzuRKSAAPI7xF/Ga/szZG4vTtaTL2foxWVd1ar5HykwmQdWAbrLOF5lAlxAyDPj2kQ76kjbUXMclFO7Glgd9YMexQqdsFDT77Kk8a1fxk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=WG/JvH9A; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WG/JvH9A" Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2402774851fso15195ad.1; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 02:57:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1753610226; x=1754215026; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=muUtX0lSh6gtM3PBB5xVgiDhmrdOkyfI1XoOF1+/laI=; b=WG/JvH9AfWbwGlYXrXzhTDMcGW184coSrEizoKJgPL6//YXFyNNXpRwCcfCr64Vdfg CyeJ7j4PF1Loy/KJJkHZnrxCORZC5iBrfy6124YY03DKOUnpXFnxw7zFRrqXi3lsJCXq xLvnkmULgglCoprYx3M/ERXyQE/nztyUswpmLGAMVamuqLY2qJlfC42LCdC3fSIZIjdM d1xER3Nwkoe0qucGQam829YT7PCuLgYkIftwafidAHuUtnKX+csd2dHFS05jDrM4dzgx XRW1EK0aMeOZpwScOaNPGlp/WcBs3rpYmwWGnye5wbEd4J2foVr0BpRrW6zJBQ1jk6OP flew== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1753610226; x=1754215026; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=muUtX0lSh6gtM3PBB5xVgiDhmrdOkyfI1XoOF1+/laI=; b=KS0zQYnzzzsKV4P/ngGmJCCApwj86kaAm0/Cc4ql8ZYMxTs+0UuxvC411U10vDx0Xf xU6SkFK4k0wMZV4TjeulmCyyCfE/vmS/cA3I/yiopZvV2U5C/ButeAtINTI8W1yRd0D3 1tpZ8I698oxjUPSukg2NTh/zYSs0PRxIQu8faKbcBXutl4Ib3/3VjDD0ci+9wZ/rRSeT YJMLHTOciqiuBkL6ML0He4+8M1xc78ne7dH+POVFcXVMbAcgYrOTi/9UrVyx2wiyzF24 w+IpudvAI7UDhwzrIQ6YUJJ39951rSfLVMhEpc7sHoySmgpDqZ9eUPFfHRFANaodBSKD 3L/w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVsL56cSwv+i4qDblRtJEqO9d9+5In092opp2RHtWo5ifFUyp/VBljnguydVwNsfDVLCXyLxIAUbss6+tE=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxh3yKNmrHM4RCTNgpz6INrNjqXC7fjnj5EYqTrCCpV8gVigu/K hgqvCKL57wmye6Kehm/YRJvKqYwGQxJfv56YVjt3P3KglCEqVXiMJEipVgipOFLX X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncthawiIJINIgJ66G1+QurgdTWFO+fZjeYPxYdqrdNAmVN/JtOMnS0Ee6zOOxjG KfYQmQ9kPPjbcvDNbY8ekrrttCRK96lA3X8cyQ7Va9Bnzq2OcwTE81XOPcO18dy3gULZBp6XKOw W7/pavHtJw2L2HKk+FRCMyrXOZ5U6HHprMhk9UR2DoIv7ka56+2Cgr+t6XX9zGG7rc0wZYXFsWp 69cQda3C9/p8r682t8N1+KHwWtsOxJTU07oFRiRXnBpfvHcL0QXgLI39ZS9j5X4QgDSKCjIsFZj /j149/JS5HhmwiKDMzMrEE75fdBAkdBtNTV0ggnkPMja3MUkeEmKu7Z3fGrgiFaj/CuVHDUSnX9 LJBK1hTMVlfQvaUPK7VPrAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQG3kLtkocztWO0RATICIWOPiyz9ICOWjSNS+zDpM7I3jFhyHHPhD6/+UKe1O9Fox824bOaw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:230c:b0:240:96a:b81d with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-240096abbc8mr20897525ad.5.1753610225956; Sun, 27 Jul 2025 02:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop-os.. ([49.207.200.229]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2400ac15a9fsm7292685ad.93.2025.07.27.02.57.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Jul 2025 02:57:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Aditya Dutt To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Dmitry Antipov , Dave Kleikamp , Dave Kleikamp , skhan@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linux.dev, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, syzbot+ac2116e48989e84a2893@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Aditya Dutt Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] jfs: reject on-disk inodes of an unsupported type Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2025 15:26:45 +0530 Message-Id: <20250727095645.530309-1-duttaditya18@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Dmitry Antipov [ Upstream commit 8c3f9a70d2d4dd6c640afe294b05c6a0a45434d9 ] Syzbot has reported the following BUG: kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:668! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 139 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-syzkaller-000= 85-g4e46774408d9 #0 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 0= 4/01/2014 RIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x168/0x190 Code: 4c 89 f7 e8 ba fe e5 ff e9 61 ff ff ff 44 89 f1 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 = c1 7c c1 4c 89 f7 e8 90 ff e5 ff eb b7 0b e8 01 5d 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f9 5c 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f1 5c 7f RSP: 0018:ffffc900027dfae8 EFLAGS: 00010093 RAX: ffffffff82157a87 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888104d4b980 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffffc900027dfc90 R08: ffffffff82157977 R09: fffff520004fbf38 R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff520004fbf38 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff88811315bc00 R14: ffff88811315bda8 R15: ffff88811315bb80 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888135f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00005565222e0578 CR3: 0000000026ef0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: ? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0 ? die+0x9e/0xc0 ? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10 ? report_bug+0x3cd/0x500 ? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50 ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 ? clear_inode+0x57/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x168/0x190 ? clear_inode+0x167/0x190 jfs_evict_inode+0xb5/0x440 ? __pfx_jfs_evict_inode+0x10/0x10 evict+0x4ea/0x9b0 ? __pfx_evict+0x10/0x10 ? iput+0x713/0xa50 txUpdateMap+0x931/0xb10 ? __pfx_txUpdateMap+0x10/0x10 jfs_lazycommit+0x49a/0xb80 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8f/0x140 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x99/0x150 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_default_wake_function+0x10/0x10 ? __kthread_parkme+0x169/0x1d0 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 kthread+0x2f2/0x390 ? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 This happens when 'clear_inode()' makes an attempt to finalize an underlying JFS inode of unknown type. According to JFS layout description from https://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/jfslayout.pdf, inode types from 5 to 15 are reserved for future extensions and should not be encountered on a va= lid filesystem. So add an extra check for valid inode type in 'copy_from_dinode= ()'. Reported-by: syzbot+ac2116e48989e84a2893@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3Dac2116e48989e84a2893 Fixes: 79ac5a46c5c1 ("jfs_lookup(): don't bother with . or ..") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp Signed-off-by: Aditya Dutt --- As per: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAODzB9roW_ObEa8K8kowbfQ4bL3w4R78v2b_yB= U4BQL4bpXrWw@mail.gmail.com/ this commit is not backported to any of the stable kernels (other than 6.15= .y) I have already sent an email for 6.12.y: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/202= 50727095111.527745-1-duttaditya18@gmail.com/ I will be sending separate emails for 6.1.y and 5.15.y fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c index 9a6d504228e7..35f3144d703b 100644 --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c @@ -3029,14 +3029,23 @@ static void duplicateIXtree(struct super_block *sb,= s64 blkno, * * RETURN VALUES: * 0 - success - * -ENOMEM - insufficient memory + * -EINVAL - unexpected inode type */ static int copy_from_dinode(struct dinode * dip, struct inode *ip) { struct jfs_inode_info *jfs_ip =3D JFS_IP(ip); struct jfs_sb_info *sbi =3D JFS_SBI(ip->i_sb); + int fileset =3D le32_to_cpu(dip->di_fileset); + + switch (fileset) { + case AGGR_RESERVED_I: case AGGREGATE_I: case BMAP_I: + case LOG_I: case BADBLOCK_I: case FILESYSTEM_I: + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } =20 - jfs_ip->fileset =3D le32_to_cpu(dip->di_fileset); + jfs_ip->fileset =3D fileset; jfs_ip->mode2 =3D le32_to_cpu(dip->di_mode); jfs_set_inode_flags(ip); =20 --=20 2.34.1