From nobody Sun Dec 14 19:25:27 2025 Received: from mail-pf1-f182.google.com (mail-pf1-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E87279910 for ; Fri, 23 May 2025 05:31:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.182 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747978314; cv=none; b=qz4sWAhz0QY6+4YmUsuLKg6FWimLWiQraeQxZKpSR+X+XWFDgZgHWvt49yr1BrxJTnYuo3x+trwKlmbMnONmn+Lam1QDg7krnlDhtokp+V7p+G2QPYKOskPob1R3gZxy7f7wPH9q4uvpwEYPtr0U4I278htJA9WEtXiqz9u73a4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747978314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mFlWD56vPu3d8UgcxrBCVKbXp5oD4x3UlEJaPXxX564=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=JN7e+0vY1W0JpyVEFp5txO1zT9i3S07/DpkI9EIP6s2/vsivq73CZ1jx8mJ3KLU33jdD5bm6zoF5H08lhpXS1WeK9FfHJJiedcTZUb/Vw3AcezZVt8jNLecA9vDySD6PRhGThcxFdc81UlP7P8NOR03FOifgIFnYuBDPT0bjrQ4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=Wyj8ExGe; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="Wyj8ExGe" Received: by mail-pf1-f182.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-72d3b48d2ffso8015238b3a.2 for ; Thu, 22 May 2025 22:31:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1747978313; x=1748583113; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=kAP36O6BU8F9DPrpB68y1EW9dwWbq9r1wcSyP6fe6ws=; b=Wyj8ExGe3JEcKx0ilUK2Fb7ZVQSWYWATyIWmt71+sB/8j2xXZn8gZ/6r8v97mGyvg+ 35P13IjTCZg+Nq+MwUnEwaO1nMUUHXvKAqRlpZbRynmKw0EuNRUBId5Z+7CioG5NQ5lO IHFt9XwTlWcqwmhG6jU7zS/f4ezNVpDKC7/GFk/MW3qKkuwxDp7guOd4i/VguTbPjS/e 0HjZ88tXlp3zse1jTXyjOUk0v3257gETwKfl5FEsB5vpXrNlUuzb+atyzNo8x9Ms8LKO uSfw3CPGDfBHxZXPmst5+wHGqyg/xssW8qN0NInBJ0t3wYGnvS2EdIN1ctJP1RVyyy20 0iOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747978313; x=1748583113; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kAP36O6BU8F9DPrpB68y1EW9dwWbq9r1wcSyP6fe6ws=; b=oWUPFDkFzUXaaRNdwivg97k1SF+lx4AP9xDKRSiSZyrZV77ShjTkMBOkZ6z/cFudsd rOkpooHjEvqdeeD+fPG2+DIdsrHKlAaM364LnWSbc/ao/+iDiPmkbk3sAzcgxP1i4l+c YCSKFPEWXyFDxwVQ8wBpOIHEwsrTVw10QShpu/fIXY1TyEcCqEUQlYs0V12ubS2MdBgW 5qUn66oFrGVUf9W6XEa6FN1ziDjeLjl/dI2lge9JfTpljiVZOl3npv1FrlDTdGC/B8qm EwmAd7ZA1fwHIYzXdUyNvEXuRbsipctfkZoMq9f1MrSZRNru7BnVrfgyKfYntg7BlBgk 54ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/5nMpROeNSTf5d8iDZood3+HCmO/PuiRn09s4/BO+U8U9FD+7 uzRo2rVcGk/lIp093aEhjHigxeWrvKu+yNQ37vLqUIassw4fMoJU8HAz5kiVQOyUD50= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv+isEgOHecWsb1fw39MB0qZST5MmMnIf1IO3fBgFgbf871pbnjqcS4YjzQ1p+ isoth7LLQbb6oyHna8YO9ZEKEOkFemIZVPNOW7Cn/lDz6wte+ETQUG++Uchqv4PU6uNR9IWLRCw OKbS+uWy21VVZ8keaDb7vcwx4r3dGt/Yzhj0RW3RD+ZqgMFd3F3VGmUlBt+fgE56BlWgaZ5E/U9 kwgTO86dQw6BdBOXBOUbmfFiL21LCrWbb0vtfIPH4EB+M0nMmpvlkAo51x1DTAMwc+OUc0SFc3Q JvE/16Yt4Se0vUNIxp32JxuatSBBig5qp2YxU8nHcNYJcGPJiq+L4pjdpsjyJJ9MX0oCachU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG/frD50LLCsvbIrlD2jSPxh93OKt57M4X/B5I6SUB8JpNmYlw+536CX4BdNo2P+aa2d078pw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:7287:b0:201:85f4:ad07 with SMTP id adf61e73a8af0-2170ce19ebbmr38410458637.33.1747978312596; Thu, 22 May 2025 22:31:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-742a982a0a4sm12474336b3a.101.2025.05.22.22.31.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 22 May 2025 22:31:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 22:31:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v16 12/27] riscv: Implements arch agnostic shadow stack prctls Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20250522-v5_user_cfi_series-v16-12-64f61a35eee7@rivosinc.com> References: <20250522-v5_user_cfi_series-v16-0-64f61a35eee7@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20250522-v5_user_cfi_series-v16-0-64f61a35eee7@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Jann Horn , Conor Dooley , Miguel Ojeda , Alex Gaynor , Boqun Feng , Gary Guo , =?utf-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= , Benno Lossin , Andreas Hindborg , Alice Ryhl , Trevor Gross Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, Zong Li , Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.13.0 Implement architecture agnostic prctls() interface for setting and getting shadow stack status. prctls implemented are PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS and PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS. As part of PR_SET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS/PR_GET_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS, only PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE is implemented because RISCV allows each mode to write to their own shadow stack using `sspush` or `ssamoswap`. PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS locks current configuration of shadow stack enabling. Reviewed-by: Zong Li Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 16 ++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 8 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ 3 files changed, 134 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/user= cfi.h index 0581587490c2..b530ff5baa6e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ =20 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ #include +#include =20 struct task_struct; struct kernel_clone_args; @@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ struct kernel_clone_args; #ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI struct cfi_state { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ + unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1; unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */ unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */ unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ @@ -26,6 +28,12 @@ void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned l= ong shstk_addr, unsigned unsigned long get_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long *size= ); void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr); bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task); +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable); + +#define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) =20 #else =20 @@ -41,6 +49,14 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task); =20 #define is_shstk_enabled(task) false =20 +#define is_shstk_locked(task) false + +#define is_shstk_allocated(task) false + +#define set_shstk_lock(task) + +#define set_shstk_status(task, enable) + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ =20 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index 99acb6342a37..cd11667593fe 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -153,6 +153,14 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long = pc, regs->epc =3D pc; regs->sp =3D sp; =20 + /* + * clear shadow stack state on exec. + * libc will set it later via prctl. + */ + set_shstk_status(current, false); + set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0); + set_active_shstk(current, 0); + #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT regs->status &=3D ~SR_UXL; =20 diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index ec3d78efd6f3..08620bdae696 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ bool is_shstk_enabled(struct task_struct *task) return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en; } =20 +bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base; +} + +bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked; +} + void set_shstk_base(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long shstk_addr, un= signed long size) { task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.shdw_stk_base =3D shstk_addr; @@ -42,6 +52,26 @@ void set_active_shstk(struct task_struct *task, unsigned= long shstk_addr) task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.user_shdw_stk =3D shstk_addr; } =20 +void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return; + + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_en =3D enable ? 1 : 0; + + if (enable) + task->thread.envcfg |=3D ENVCFG_SSE; + else + task->thread.envcfg &=3D ~ENVCFG_SSE; + + csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread.envcfg); +} + +void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked =3D 1; +} + /* * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be= as big as * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back @@ -261,3 +291,83 @@ void shstk_release(struct task_struct *tsk) vm_munmap(base, size); set_shstk_base(tsk, 0, 0); } + +int arch_get_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __us= er *status) +{ + unsigned long bcfi_status =3D 0; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* this means shadow stack is enabled on the task */ + bcfi_status |=3D (is_shstk_enabled(t) ? PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE : 0); + + return copy_to_user(status, &bcfi_status, sizeof(bcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT = : 0; +} + +int arch_set_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long stat= us) +{ + unsigned long size =3D 0, addr =3D 0; + bool enable_shstk =3D false; + + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Reject unknown flags */ + if (status & ~PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK) + return -EINVAL; + + /* bcfi status is locked and further can't be modified by user */ + if (is_shstk_locked(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + enable_shstk =3D status & PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE; + /* Request is to enable shadow stack and shadow stack is not enabled alre= ady */ + if (enable_shstk && !is_shstk_enabled(t)) { + /* shadow stack was allocated and enable request again + * no need to support such usecase and return EINVAL. + */ + if (is_shstk_allocated(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + size =3D calc_shstk_size(0); + addr =3D allocate_shadow_stack(0, size, 0, false); + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr)) + return -ENOMEM; + set_shstk_base(t, addr, size); + set_active_shstk(t, addr + size); + } + + /* + * If a request to disable shadow stack happens, let's go ahead and relea= se it + * Although, if CLONE_VFORKed child did this, then in that case we will e= nd up + * not releasing the shadow stack (because it might be needed in parent).= Although + * we will disable it for VFORKed child. And if VFORKed child tries to en= able again + * then in that case, it'll get entirely new shadow stack because followi= ng condition + * are true + * - shadow stack was not enabled for vforked child + * - shadow stack base was anyways pointing to 0 + * This shouldn't be a big issue because we want parent to have availabil= ity of shadow + * stack whenever VFORKed child releases resources via exit or exec but a= t the same + * time we want VFORKed child to break away and establish new shadow stac= k if it desires + * + */ + if (!enable_shstk) + shstk_release(t); + + set_shstk_status(t, enable_shstk); + return 0; +} + +int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long arg) +{ + /* If shtstk not supported or not enabled on task, nothing to lock here */ + if (!cpu_supports_shadow_stack() || + !is_shstk_enabled(task) || arg !=3D 0) + return -EINVAL; + + set_shstk_lock(task); + + return 0; +} --=20 2.43.0