From nobody Tue Dec 16 13:24:15 2025 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFA428A721 for ; Thu, 8 May 2025 17:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746724840; cv=none; b=BHbsUL7Ijw9J0dvN+XAn7/POoUsqgJA/ZBSiHS/vyWaOIviPPs1lLB1cVBp7udrA3AbQy6qTkBb7Gmy+JRiv65kVTtt+NCBt1maWxG6NgznUN+3JuvQf5Lo0zCd7uXL7paG6qcdkPIKTns4r+4dAgPZ/thCkOwxiVa6b/Fkz9Ss= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746724840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FuIYXveF9FXBDEiAOKcqSo743yeH1CLJGMiU4ZcDYRs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=i2ClbQT0hjlTXzqePEslHwf4WXh//yLAT6cHwjViU1kDr5Ncnlrvz2p7j2JnzUvZVk9e2vVfI7G+RVGFYVzAzh3NtuxgxzRs6rjAYFoLZzX2dfGaStgimflQGPd9z+qifgvxtszNwEk1gdCb84AqK6E/gpn1tFGwACoF+saQhg0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC9725DF; Thu, 8 May 2025 10:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merodach.members.linode.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E64C43F58B; Thu, 8 May 2025 10:20:34 -0700 (PDT) From: James Morse To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Reinette Chatre , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , H Peter Anvin , Babu Moger , James Morse , shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Rex Nie , Dave Martin , Koba Ko , Shanker Donthineni , fenghuay@nvidia.com, Dave Martin , Shaopeng Tan , Babu Moger Subject: [PATCH v10 21/30] x86/resctrl: Prefer alloc(sizeof(*foo)) idiom in rdt_init_fs_context() Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 17:18:49 +0000 Message-Id: <20250508171858.9197-22-james.morse@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20250508171858.9197-1-james.morse@arm.com> References: <20250508171858.9197-1-james.morse@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" From: Dave Martin rdt_init_fs_context() sizes a typed allocation using an explicit sizeof(type) expression, which checkpatch.pl complains about. Since this code is about to be factored out and made generic, this is a good opportunity to fix the code to size the allocation based on the target pointer instead, to reduce the chance of future mis- maintenance. Fix it. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Dave Martin Signed-off-by: James Morse Tested-by: Peter Newman Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan Tested-by: Amit Singh Tomar # arm64 Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni # arm64 Tested-by: Babu Moger Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu Reviewed-by: Reinette Chatre --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/r= esctrl/rdtgroup.c index 8680c05567b8..9a27e617070a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c @@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ static int rdt_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc) { struct rdt_fs_context *ctx; =20 - ctx =3D kzalloc(sizeof(struct rdt_fs_context), GFP_KERNEL); + ctx =3D kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); if (!ctx) return -ENOMEM; =20 --=20 2.39.5