From nobody Wed Dec 17 07:27:53 2025 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3780259CB6 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 12:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742386956; cv=none; b=PBn6VKH87DjuVAlczkTOq+BMZUBANilALvHqdFVoQVk5NYN6lIhBFGr2CTTveXSuy0tZn0/xhUAURhftr5INcZpdpFLH9QPHnyUVxPmlMt2kKRMwKiq3g/7uFaKg9P6dA/O0yewcui5KuSl2e+3I5LsXSSHaErxGaRV00zQwKvM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742386956; c=relaxed/simple; bh=th2v8uIZxkNCwoK+iUYJGOuhkFbvACgd0pAZP4DTsZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=aUx4E2tQ0Z7wzgfhqjOPmHld2BtulmS755aTv67G1EIskwmeWXQjat/D7BTqHPrkeyEzhSMhXQ4hnFVEFnIQ/eJwTyKq6Xl1aLMPFEw/PH4NFwuMUla/gv94MXRR3ansaYqxnt6MX/1LAVdB2/odanNWTpnt9azYW2lUGgPMrbY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=K26+rURk; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=gqEWumR6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="K26+rURk"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="gqEWumR6" From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1742386953; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ONR2OjC3vdtbfqAVF3kBhl5I8v4wLD4Vyr+ztNwbbYs=; b=K26+rURkI9bF9n+83c/c083Tifu4slrRIIah/pqzolDJePzVLEpCf0tNkj0yWqP/ckh3vz QA1FqHmaC+WG9OOE+CaEPo1VDuZy6aD+zzEBPmsukeTdUtTFGnpcfOADRCL1TLrUbnnHrp zkqQjH13cYcCf5ia+YUSHglF/6d8Nnp+Q4kVEfjxZ+/jqxJH7P6UwbVGyQgVyXj6QPrj5b uArmbA2Nfs4yFUJNK0eLC4aY3bAx18yFIT8IPdQ6/weVBW/eEifMMGaf4imNSBbdl5qPaj QJ+7S0qWjhRU0eXpZA1PZoKHHs1CqWOGXoDiWcCBU8GdNilBdzN4mA3cV6otmw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1742386953; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ONR2OjC3vdtbfqAVF3kBhl5I8v4wLD4Vyr+ztNwbbYs=; b=gqEWumR6b/Ij1QibEC9APb5csNIIObg6SDNZroFzJS74aPecDU+m/2qjjepO5NqVz1Aa1D ItdPdXiy6/dYwYBw== To: Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , "H. Peter Anvin" , John Ogness , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML , "Ahmed S. Darwish" Subject: [PATCH v3 16/29] x86/cacheinfo: Rename _cpuid4_info_regs to _cpuid4_info Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 13:21:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20250319122137.4004-17-darwi@linutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20250319122137.4004-1-darwi@linutronix.de> References: <20250319122137.4004-1-darwi@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Parent commits decoupled amd_northbridge from _cpuid4_info_regs, moved AMD L3 northbridge cache_disable_0/1 sysfs code to its own file, and splitted AMD vs. Intel leaf 0x4 handling into: amd_fill_cpuid4_info() intel_fill_cpuid4_info() fill_cpuid4_info() After doing all that, the "_cpuid4_info_regs" name becomes a mouthful. It is also not totally accurate, as the structure holds cpuid4 derived information like cache node ID and size -- not just regs. Rename struct _cpuid4_info_regs to _cpuid4_info. That new name also better matches the AMD/Intel leaf 0x4 functions mentioned above. Signed-off-by: Ahmed S. Darwish --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinf= o.c index 10a79d87ce86..2aaa0f830ec3 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cacheinfo.c @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx { u32 full; }; =20 -struct _cpuid4_info_regs { +struct _cpuid4_info { union _cpuid4_leaf_eax eax; union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx; union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx ecx; @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void legacy_amd_cpuid4(int index, union _cpuid4_= leaf_eax *eax, (ebx->split.ways_of_associativity + 1) - 1; } =20 -static int cpuid4_info_fill_done(struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4, union _cpu= id4_leaf_eax eax, +static int cpuid4_info_fill_done(struct _cpuid4_info *id4, union _cpuid4_l= eaf_eax eax, union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx, union _cpuid4_leaf_ecx ecx) { if (eax.split.type =3D=3D CTYPE_NULL) @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int cpuid4_info_fill_done(struct _cpuid4_info_re= gs *id4, union _cpuid4_le return 0; } =20 -static int amd_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4) +static int amd_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4) { union _cpuid4_leaf_eax eax; union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx; @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int amd_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpui= d4_info_regs *id4) return cpuid4_info_fill_done(id4, eax, ebx, ecx); } =20 -static int intel_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4) +static int intel_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4) { union _cpuid4_leaf_eax eax; union _cpuid4_leaf_ebx ebx; @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int intel_fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cp= uid4_info_regs *id4) return cpuid4_info_fill_done(id4, eax, ebx, ecx); } =20 -static int fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4) +static int fill_cpuid4_info(int index, struct _cpuid4_info *id4) { u8 cpu_vendor =3D boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor; =20 @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ void init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) * parameters cpuid leaf to find the cache details */ for (i =3D 0; i < ci->num_leaves; i++) { - struct _cpuid4_info_regs id4 =3D {}; + struct _cpuid4_info id4 =3D {}; int retval; =20 retval =3D intel_fill_cpuid4_info(i, &id4); @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ void init_intel_cacheinfo(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) } =20 static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index, - const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4) + const struct _cpuid4_info *id4) { struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci; struct cacheinfo *ci; @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static int __cache_amd_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, i= nt index, } =20 static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int index, - const struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4) + const struct _cpuid4_info *id4) { struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci =3D get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); struct cacheinfo *ci, *sibling_ci; @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ static void __cache_cpumap_setup(unsigned int cpu, int = index, } } =20 -static void ci_info_init(struct cacheinfo *ci, const struct _cpuid4_info_r= egs *id4, +static void ci_info_init(struct cacheinfo *ci, const struct _cpuid4_info *= id4, struct amd_northbridge *nb) { ci->id =3D id4->id; @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ int init_cache_level(unsigned int cpu) * ECX as cache index. Then right shift apicid by the number's order to get * cache id for this cache node. */ -static void get_cache_id(int cpu, struct _cpuid4_info_regs *id4) +static void get_cache_id(int cpu, struct _cpuid4_info *id4) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c =3D &cpu_data(cpu); unsigned long num_threads_sharing; @@ -702,8 +702,8 @@ int populate_cache_leaves(unsigned int cpu) struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci =3D get_cpu_cacheinfo(cpu); struct cacheinfo *ci =3D this_cpu_ci->info_list; u8 cpu_vendor =3D boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor; - struct _cpuid4_info_regs id4 =3D {}; struct amd_northbridge *nb =3D NULL; + struct _cpuid4_info id4 =3D {}; int idx, ret; =20 for (idx =3D 0; idx < this_cpu_ci->num_leaves; idx++) { --=20 2.48.1