From nobody Thu Dec 18 09:57:40 2025 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27D6A204C1B for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2025 07:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739347058; cv=none; b=URLatFOxrp4PBx9OEOmUNn41HqzJsp4IzSQZMiKBcs6/iwOLWy2shO7kLL0wvdtIcAkSf+tkyTG74h97TPirqnUPar1elY2ywvHHpnzkU5AxDuLt3SpR7L4kmbccB0Frla79TEep+DkG9I4aZVc6Yy6pe7snEfMCXgHYC8gocVo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739347058; c=relaxed/simple; bh=03WLSSFoaU02CLxWG0tXeMYv/zQbNS0SuGJ8yfYpC0E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=aQL28iddRIjmP4ZMDS6Z+8hUITZJhzkTeRpvKfaqki6/2SmXSWA8SGxtsEyefx1gpvlAZHkb+LQG8iK3bpSPFglDcQYGKXSeqCrypKdAc0GmW7QOnjAwqYg9biepueWIumFVjZ144GKA6E7Kuxp9/yb9+SyWVqwvk2oV5kj31JU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=CfK8AYYx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="CfK8AYYx" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739347056; x=1770883056; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding; bh=03WLSSFoaU02CLxWG0tXeMYv/zQbNS0SuGJ8yfYpC0E=; b=CfK8AYYx9f+gJE67GzxJS72QpojQL3vbyfd6WSAIbUtcAF3usq53bd38 7p0KCgEVhOp1yA5vrkOYQrHO/awQ8/DQZZ5urjIiq4K02wJT01+Z3AbWF mpAM1K/0hSAl9w8SMbHYXxl1u59oL773YXDf+f/EqTqhhTZicpJn6b9UH Zfo1UrCfarfibGu9etEVGg6XwCsCqVYheRQUTbIDdcHdekq4qcFbOJQeg 59b3/niRoOra/l5mqVz/6Kqm/zJ221W6G69L1STqpZiFM65mYNCM5u8tU vo2gOKHFln1YKcSp4MZmI+gCG+zX45u+E85DCgXuD0P1mrg1x/g4mTG92 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BR4CZVcASn6KQsf8puinBw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: h4xboBwsSeS86WhCuXQs6g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11342"; a="50633575" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,279,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="50633575" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Feb 2025 23:57:35 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 13DZUju0SoiMtD+w64Lw0Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +yODgdJLT2uqUBxxM0irSw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,279,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="112700731" Received: from ubuntu.bj.intel.com ([10.238.156.105]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Feb 2025 23:57:34 -0800 From: Jun Miao To: kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] x86/virt/tdx: Correct the errors in the comments Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 15:58:05 +0800 Message-Id: <20250212075805.2906200-1-jun.miao@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" In comment of config_global_keyid(), the "will fail" is duplicate, delete i= t. Signed-off-by: Jun Miao Acked-by: Kai Huang Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov --- arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c index 7fdb37387886..2023216a04a9 100644 --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c @@ -961,8 +961,8 @@ static int do_global_key_config(void *unused) * Attempt to configure the global KeyID on all physical packages. * * This requires running code on at least one CPU in each package. - * TDMR initialization) will fail will fail if any package in the - * system has no online CPUs. + * TDMR initialization) will fail if any package in the system has + * no online CPUs. * * This code takes no affirmative steps to online CPUs. Callers (aka. * KVM) can ensure success by ensuring sufficient CPUs are online and --=20 2.32.0