From nobody Wed Feb 11 03:44:20 2026 Received: from mail-pj1-f49.google.com (mail-pj1-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A14DC22B8C8 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 01:22:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738718542; cv=none; b=LxIQH8WQxJYNUktCHZkksHNUo6zGgcquBJl8nyPXbHy342X3DnttCBrPk38ihtjd52S2UQpsvnIFj/zlt/RamsoNhobQbvhjNMlpPglAvAUgI52vq8Ps7r0tZCbRaOLTM54G4ur7XylONqB1cRNVwwCCkjAzPNKaDVMpHMf1QrI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738718542; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Xs2uqRxouRI9SPyjKajL1/XQBsSIyAcRzD4AuzRwjnA=; h=From:Date:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-Id:References: In-Reply-To:To:Cc; b=E8zow17ZSBOsyWvIZrlMmagdTEU4S+hW70dAYv3O+KB/GIBqXuAgktMKPNJMoBbBZoyIRUd/8HiCENowqrpA20BzXS76H5BmmvwvcBjt6pzdw6Ibh0Xt+uyTmtrGzJq8aoWPk5E6ZxIjVhA4YwJ+q3Y420klvz3tEHwFFWMliso= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=DyLZCXsH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.216.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rivosinc.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="DyLZCXsH" Received: by mail-pj1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2f9cb23d22cso1694881a91.1 for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:22:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rivosinc-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1738718539; x=1739323339; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=n4wOXS0/20DvZRxruHD7mFnd6lRzln/dV2wTFJ6STYc=; b=DyLZCXsHuK1IQyczay29tBY/l4k8XR8qH4GizMtWpjPN9A3itPHm4LuklEoWfXaNY6 XhKsfFQRkHP1NkSr4mZdUCdb4wKf8eJEwoNVigcU+1oa2ThMIkX3zengdzpov2B/uP3k rsX2At7Z8D0xsNQVJ1gWomKhhJPIBll5I2YlPhZDX7L2dPBC4uBZ6kdQ0RULwqZcYaMg 2vpVFA2A+AAKW12UA+DkzqGmh+HBZz8WRXXGYEUBWShqUlym8rPyrb/HN12uNxuVKDtQ b221+MD/foNwI053+drWS6lsMLif9TGwIXmJEhvgCR+n4JAuGdf3LmKw21RXnMXhhHJX nDdg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738718539; x=1739323339; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n4wOXS0/20DvZRxruHD7mFnd6lRzln/dV2wTFJ6STYc=; b=mf4EIgzr/Io0OKZwOCv4lxTS+Ni/vD+8rBoLdCiBFHRb8Gifc7GGyZ/GEOSQErEMVU JBMbVmQGeFYQX8NGCLq3LwZj/H8TZDkCGJ64K0Kjt1MOPvg2tgyk5FBb3qPAecWO7J/z IhlQ7ATt5rsqORQnHVijxfVqRAKREKxORVe34O32C2+ml/z5l0WNTbPwF24aYfh1qpt/ 8kaTBj0QYgNA/274ZjNlg5q0Dx5WyCkRez/uWkfVFmWYSDuz+psuJmwxuL4yX5d+JZCv xfG0Nb73/RSzGEmBqnc643S9dTNtB1b7ZBAmSwUeaf4HauBxSsQuipd9mEHgSIhaSM3x jZJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxE6vau6LVT+PGdp0RUxaVB5FQewv+GTlMDDfiSft6GDfTCl0SU NskFKLglbuSHtYbMGNkxnx3gbSk4UTJqcsPmH7/psRcXgvCalNuZijcBlH0WR0k= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncvI+Srux+p1HD+Rsl464zpMD21CDespX49eYJK/4NcetH8vhmiaG7XiVYHYust g4E7OKtZfrexuhkYeWIgaMV+f5l6EO0dw5renmUKqZF6x8ishBlVr/Ppn+dk2aPDHZiRUcRnzmW AAfB4LfgAjv0bV/XdC59rayLQOoZwjyRT7ccB9EwvBZ6/XjEuA05z531QxyLV5myKc6P6Xx/j5z uBK1WIuEKWZP7aZz0hkCZ+iugOdklwqyrC5RSIUpphuThiVRah3DH+JM28SQycpTmqoIIM8r09D /G0WekbjmK0SPA4/DQ93lBtP3g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkMV3NZQlTfgqHebic0yhy4xKkC1OVABBD14xN7hIjWbNvTWOJifhfgskqBrlP8VDgH29eiw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2886:b0:729:1b8f:9645 with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-7303521c6d7mr1821327b3a.24.1738718538832; Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from debug.ba.rivosinc.com ([64.71.180.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-72fe69cec0fsm11457202b3a.137.2025.02.04.17.22.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:22:18 -0800 (PST) From: Deepak Gupta Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2025 17:22:00 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v9 13/26] prctl: arch-agnostic prctl for indirect branch tracking Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20250204-v5_user_cfi_series-v9-13-b37a49c5205c@rivosinc.com> References: <20250204-v5_user_cfi_series-v9-0-b37a49c5205c@rivosinc.com> In-Reply-To: <20250204-v5_user_cfi_series-v9-0-b37a49c5205c@rivosinc.com> To: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Lorenzo Stoakes , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Conor Dooley , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Arnd Bergmann , Christian Brauner , Peter Zijlstra , Oleg Nesterov , Eric Biederman , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Jann Horn , Conor Dooley Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, jim.shu@sifive.com, andybnac@gmail.com, kito.cheng@sifive.com, charlie@rivosinc.com, atishp@rivosinc.com, evan@rivosinc.com, cleger@rivosinc.com, alexghiti@rivosinc.com, samitolvanen@google.com, broonie@kernel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, Deepak Gupta X-Mailer: b4 0.14.0 Three architectures (x86, aarch64, riscv) have support for indirect branch tracking feature in a very similar fashion. On a very high level, indirect branch tracking is a CPU feature where CPU tracks branches which uses memory operand to perform control transfer in program. As part of this tracking on indirect branches, CPU goes in a state where it expects a landing pad instr on target and if not found then CPU raises some fault (architecture dependent) x86 landing pad instr - `ENDBRANCH` aarch64 landing pad instr - `BTI` riscv landing instr - `lpad` Given that three major arches have support for indirect branch tracking, This patch makes `prctl` for indirect branch tracking arch agnostic. To allow userspace to enable this feature for itself, following prtcls are defined: - PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Gets current configured status for indirect branch tracking. - PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Sets a configuration for indirect branch tracking. Following status options are allowed - PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE: Enables indirect branch tracking on user thread. - PR_INDIR_BR_LP_DISABLE; Disables indirect branch tracking on user thread. - PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: Locks configured status for indirect branch tracking for user thread. Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta Reviewed-by: Mark Brown --- arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 16 ++++++++- arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 2 +- arch/riscv/kernel/process.c | 5 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++ include/linux/cpu.h | 4 +++ include/uapi/linux/prctl.h | 27 ++++++++++++++ kernel/sys.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++ 7 files changed, 158 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/user= cfi.h index c4dcd256f19a..a8cec7c14d1d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ struct kernel_clone_args; struct cfi_status { unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */ unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1; - unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) - 2); + unsigned long ufcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for forward cfi. Note that ELP goes= in sstatus */ + unsigned long ufcfi_locked : 1; + unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) - 4); unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */ unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */ unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */ @@ -33,6 +35,10 @@ bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task); bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task); void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task); void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable); +bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task); +bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task); +void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable); +void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task); =20 #define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE) =20 @@ -58,6 +64,14 @@ void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool ena= ble); =20 #define set_shstk_status(task, enable) =20 +#define is_indir_lp_enabled(task) false + +#define is_indir_lp_locked(task) false + +#define set_indir_lp_status(task, enable) + +#define set_indir_lp_lock(task) + #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */ =20 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S index 68c99124ea55..00494b54ff4a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception) * Disable the FPU/Vector to detect illegal usage of floating point * or vector in kernel space. */ - li t0, SR_SUM | SR_FS_VS + li t0, SR_SUM | SR_FS_VS | SR_ELP =20 REG_L s0, TASK_TI_USER_SP(tp) csrrc s1, CSR_STATUS, t0 diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c index cd11667593fe..4587201dd81d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c @@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long = pc, set_shstk_status(current, false); set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0); set_active_shstk(current, 0); + /* + * disable indirect branch tracking on exec. + * libc will enable it later via prctl. + */ + set_indir_lp_status(current, false); =20 #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT regs->status &=3D ~SR_UXL; diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c index 37d6fb8144e7..3a66f149a4ef 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c @@ -69,6 +69,32 @@ void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task) task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked =3D 1; } =20 +bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en ? true : false; +} + +bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task) +{ + return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked ? true : false; +} + +void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en =3D enable ? 1 : 0; + + if (enable) + task->thread.envcfg |=3D ENVCFG_LPE; + else + task->thread.envcfg &=3D ~ENVCFG_LPE; + + csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread.envcfg); +} + +void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task) +{ + task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked =3D 1; +} /* * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be= as big as * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back @@ -369,3 +395,53 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *= task, =20 return 0; } + +int arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __use= r *status) +{ + unsigned long fcfi_status =3D 0; + + if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* indirect branch tracking is enabled on the task or not */ + fcfi_status |=3D (is_indir_lp_enabled(t) ? PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE : 0); + + return copy_to_user(status, &fcfi_status, sizeof(fcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT = : 0; +} + +int arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long statu= s) +{ + bool enable_indir_lp =3D false; + + if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr()) + return -EINVAL; + + /* indirect branch tracking is locked and further can't be modified by us= er */ + if (is_indir_lp_locked(t)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* Reject unknown flags */ + if (status & ~PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE) + return -EINVAL; + + enable_indir_lp =3D (status & PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE) ? true : false; + set_indir_lp_status(t, enable_indir_lp); + + return 0; +} + +int arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, + unsigned long arg) +{ + /* + * If indirect branch tracking is not supported or not enabled on task, + * nothing to lock here + */ + if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr() || + !is_indir_lp_enabled(task) || arg !=3D 0) + return -EINVAL; + + set_indir_lp_lock(task); + + return 0; +} diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h index 6a0a8f1c7c90..fb0c394430c6 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpu.h +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h @@ -204,4 +204,8 @@ static inline bool cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt(void) } #endif =20 +int arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __use= r *status); +int arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long statu= s); +int arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long stat= us); + #endif /* _LINUX_CPU_H_ */ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h index 5c6080680cb2..6cd90460cbad 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/prctl.h @@ -353,4 +353,31 @@ struct prctl_mm_map { */ #define PR_LOCK_SHADOW_STACK_STATUS 76 =20 +/* + * Get the current indirect branch tracking configuration for the current + * thread, this will be the value configured via PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS. + */ +#define PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 77 + +/* + * Set the indirect branch tracking configuration. PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE w= ill + * enable cpu feature for user thread, to track all indirect branches and = ensure + * they land on arch defined landing pad instruction. + * x86 - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `ENDBRANCH` instructi= on. + * arch64 - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `BTI` instruction. + * riscv - If enabled, an indirect branch must land on `lpad` instruction. + * PR_INDIR_BR_LP_DISABLE will disable feature for user thread and indirect + * branches will no more be tracked by cpu to land on arch defined landing= pad + * instruction. + */ +#define PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 78 +# define PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE (1UL << 0) + +/* + * Prevent further changes to the specified indirect branch tracking + * configuration. All bits may be locked via this call, including + * undefined bits. + */ +#define PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS 79 + #endif /* _LINUX_PRCTL_H */ diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c index cb366ff8703a..f347f3518d0b 100644 --- a/kernel/sys.c +++ b/kernel/sys.c @@ -2336,6 +2336,21 @@ int __weak arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task= _struct *t, unsigned long st return -EINVAL; } =20 +int __weak arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned lon= g __user *status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +int __weak arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned lon= g status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + +int __weak arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned lo= ng status) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} + #define PR_IO_FLUSHER (PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO | PF_LOCAL_THROTTLE) =20 #ifdef CONFIG_ANON_VMA_NAME @@ -2811,6 +2826,21 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(prctl, int, option, unsigned long, a= rg2, unsigned long, arg3, return -EINVAL; error =3D arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(me, arg2); break; + case PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error =3D arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(me, (unsigned long __user *)arg2); + break; + case PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error =3D arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(me, arg2); + break; + case PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS: + if (arg3 || arg4 || arg5) + return -EINVAL; + error =3D arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(me, arg2); + break; default: trace_task_prctl_unknown(option, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5); error =3D -EINVAL; --=20 2.34.1