From nobody Sun May 10 05:39:17 2026 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80C29219E4 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2025 06:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735714179; cv=none; b=R26FVMl18KVzpSrCiSFFl5ODJQTzXpuQ0jvsK9mJvNO85S/iYUrwOUTf1ImBcjv7UQZoAd43oooMy6dTyFu3iruFNF0LlCH1AoNbiiYnyP2i56H9RJmTpRdGeOtu2XTbZxvoYE82ZgmvFrINWHNxN8SsaQ5tLBGpkRf9x6dhrv0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735714179; c=relaxed/simple; bh=k04Mmt26oKB9EiMp1UIMTNMPa56NZCmIvsr7qlrb55A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=hwscQsvoy4Cvt7h+ZvXqGK43y2/FLvvuNfKkjPwa8YW6sZS1b6mFp1fPkwflvJ/cL3+nuelIMEX6ZL3AtN296qOUcxj1HfRrrOh0F3rhWLsPyJrs/8bT1a9OX82voE5FWCBVKocnGuFvhZF9gXd8j4jobAU6ZUJG0dgBIfsnJPo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=cgb9DaKv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="cgb9DaKv" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1735714176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YRIIgCXg3JsYIvS3NMssQ9//coF9ig5NRKK0Y4BlSBg=; b=cgb9DaKvvNJUhDMctXLO68/NZDLEUZ+cCZxhqJfOVXVxlU9CsVZZ6D6bmNbaKqaHk/z0qs zQufTfqmC7s7WOgr/xA+gOwyVeR4wknX5ylfeVF0isSiMbmKdXdWQqfKJezQxhMoCYY90N s7+bG6AEoDk2Bjl/AcFkcOKEEZqblww= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-624-hpPfv1w2NzOgUfkeFTMczg-1; Wed, 01 Jan 2025 01:49:32 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hpPfv1w2NzOgUfkeFTMczg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: hpPfv1w2NzOgUfkeFTMczg Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B92019560A3; Wed, 1 Jan 2025 06:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from virtlab1023.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com (virtlab1023.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com [10.8.1.187]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426C6195394B; Wed, 1 Jan 2025 06:49:29 +0000 (UTC) From: Paolo Bonzini To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: seanjc@google.com, Christian Zigotzky , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev Subject: [PATCH] KVM: allow NULL writable argument to __kvm_faultin_pfn Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2025 01:49:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20250101064928.389504-1-pbonzini@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" kvm_follow_pfn() is able to work with NULL in the .map_writable field of the homonymous struct. But __kvm_faultin_pfn() rejects the combo despite KVM for e500 trying to use it. Indeed .map_writable is not particularly useful if the flags include FOLL_WRITE and readonly guest memory is not supported, so add support to __kvm_faultin_pfn() for this case. Fixes: 1c7b627e9306 ("KVM: Add kvm_faultin_pfn() to specifically service gu= est page faults") Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky Tested-by: Christian Zigotzky Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c index de2c11dae231..5177e56fdbd5 100644 --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c @@ -2975,10 +2975,11 @@ kvm_pfn_t __kvm_faultin_pfn(const struct kvm_memory= _slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, .refcounted_page =3D refcounted_page, }; =20 - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!writable || !refcounted_page)) + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcounted_page)) return KVM_PFN_ERR_FAULT; =20 - *writable =3D false; + if (writable) + *writable =3D false; *refcounted_page =3D NULL; =20 return kvm_follow_pfn(&kfp); --=20 2.43.5