From nobody Sat Feb 7 08:49:03 2026 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 121EE17BA2 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731892125; cv=none; b=JI4k+s2NaemH9qpH2/sjeYPTyhjZaIFBx5G4Plmxkuv4WMozPxyW0lx2M1qrUOY9fjD8v7MasPovwnv+kAUelPNdLEVodgBaeRDflv0uSCLJ8wh9OfadNRKE680lnoibMJfU77kbkXFJuIscvN6KHxDfgaI7fU78k4zQ0820GMM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731892125; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PoW4nNs0VhdihucMJl2U7xHf/YDFPe+84CxzxjrHMkk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-type; b=UZBQaX1WnKw+LVXzrE9LTMKlat+HGG3hEXlGHpSmwSYr+FbST+ZrAnjzmkSa0JiswJP8HIHbooYO+Ugki1/buhnCuidotRRTESPcGWF1SpbsMH0Ja7i9izem3QJEfPPSPlgsT3m0CP9SF/0O2mLmfxyHgwF+QhVMTMZcCnSzmKo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=Sl6ceI7G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="Sl6ceI7G" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1731892123; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ojwUhaZ6QLal1kPk+jXM8dL/jirGYZcv159NaGpG9I0=; b=Sl6ceI7GQvI9Hk2pitvrJp0Id47OzX7veINR7KsAnIRDtW7sPo18W06h2GFSkKyeT52EXo qmBbfBxUd7ZEo+zyiIfvEpZGtG23RF1O1+XIAfP63cxNuITbB4+gTPWFWh3rZyyFNFus8y ET0NayBiIAwNSzk77miPclY5y8iPE0U= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-456-xP2-gD_rPEyjdu5w_AlxeA-1; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 20:08:39 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xP2-gD_rPEyjdu5w_AlxeA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: xP2-gD_rPEyjdu5w_AlxeA Received: from mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072FA19560AD; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MiWiFi-R3L-srv.redhat.com (unknown [10.72.113.10]) by mx-prod-int-01.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3968300019E; Mon, 18 Nov 2024 01:08:33 +0000 (UTC) From: Baoquan He To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, thomas.lendacky@amd.com Cc: x86@kernel.org, Baoquan He Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86/mm: clean up unused parameters of functions Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 09:08:19 +0800 Message-ID: <20241118010819.46602-3-bhe@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20241118010819.46602-1-bhe@redhat.com> References: <20241118010819.46602-1-bhe@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" For functions memremap_is_efi_data(), memremap_is_setup_data and early_memremap_is_setup_data(), their parameter 'size' is not used and sometime cause confusion. Remove it now. Signed-off-by: Baoquan He --- arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 17 +++++++---------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c index 68d78e2b1203..569a62b047a0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c @@ -593,8 +593,7 @@ static bool memremap_should_map_decrypted(resource_size= _t phys_addr, * Examine the physical address to determine if it is EFI data. Check * it against the boot params structure and EFI tables and memory types. */ -static bool memremap_is_efi_data(resource_size_t phys_addr, - unsigned long size) +static bool memremap_is_efi_data(resource_size_t phys_addr) { u64 paddr; =20 @@ -709,14 +708,12 @@ static bool __ref __memremap_is_setup_data(resource_s= ize_t phys_addr, } #undef SD_SIZE =20 -static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr, - unsigned long size) +static bool memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr) { return __memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, false); } =20 -static bool early_memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr, - unsigned long size) +static bool early_memremap_is_setup_data(resource_size_t phys_addr) { return __memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, true); } @@ -739,8 +736,8 @@ bool arch_memremap_can_ram_remap(resource_size_t phys_a= ddr, unsigned long size, return false; =20 if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) { - if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) || - memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size)) + if (memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr) || + memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr)) return false; } =20 @@ -765,8 +762,8 @@ pgprot_t __init early_memremap_pgprot_adjust(resource_s= ize_t phys_addr, encrypted_prot =3D true; =20 if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT)) { - if (early_memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr, size) || - memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr, size)) + if (early_memremap_is_setup_data(phys_addr) || + memremap_is_efi_data(phys_addr)) encrypted_prot =3D false; } =20 --=20 2.41.0