From nobody Sat Nov 23 12:29:45 2024 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CD2A52F76; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731508574; cv=none; b=EOGvGP7aLrZ8+SPuPrPqVfqvyo1tp+Y6nFFyyxrYtM+xhBSSxpDJngXhpq52FZfkOzxfZJcSg4+BQTVKjQccPwJvNejnXIK7VBP2DttF5yb1egPHAbQMoMTEhE+7xbwjvoX1joOgthQ9WHsLfXIA8PUkOvLUdMRhpHCX+dMIN2A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731508574; c=relaxed/simple; bh=icntjnGysQ+hEHpDE9l/ljFz9vl8wA8BHuRskt5DZkM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=O4xAlFk+4UwoykFPVYMau45zFSmTMpBa/L/P/cX+jNfHTzNBXMpWlCCgsLAnjVWlfPSoz6jEnhg5MgmFwzWMpgfibP5PrWCpXGWuKVNi4ksMtrVBV9YBZapOVZo/JoYjCIHFNpq4e5fBZLT240FZmc0zoocuRf4vjgNPZcZ5/7U= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=iB6e51ql; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="iB6e51ql" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360072.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4ADDQKcW016314; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:09 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=zQ0K3g3G6sAWCVQAB OYxVi1Yu2obe6oJxQWPuvuV0RI=; b=iB6e51ql2tanqrVO8+wtZ+nwedPYfPBh8 ue1eAoa9DW7gE+GsisZCL5woziyb/tBoDoYVJoNFapxI9jrOK7sf9pJwHyteaN1+ a2t3WmNa4RNQWsS1vPs2GpMTYBt4KBi2CoBEa+Edty7zr28YVQt5TKEt91B6cSZE /0yNAdP33+DAIk7ezyDM+4kAhMXw3uU3OrRso2pRDPQD46cC+nspWiZ/4FOBybMX nmwELMMe7agaVE5J9qUylg/osdKUyfKx5/1q5bdNRa50HuErgqRSOd1jQGy7jcPN I+NLXYBiUaxjXlWreZbRz72m/4Kcf+rYAjnVZ8edxzlPRx4Ln9Bsg== Received: from ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dd.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.221]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42vdceuurq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4AD799LI017144; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:08 GMT Received: from smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.72]) by ppma13.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42tm9je8ke-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:08 +0000 Received: from smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.104]) by smtprelay05.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4ADEa63h11207278 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:06 GMT Received: from smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFC058067; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7010958052; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from WIN-DU0DFC9G5VV.austin.ibm.com (unknown [9.41.105.143]) by smtpav05.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Nov 2024 14:36:06 +0000 (GMT) From: Konstantin Shkolnyy To: sgarzare@redhat.com Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, Konstantin Shkolnyy Subject: [PATCH v6 1/3] vsock/test: fix failures due to wrong SO_RCVLOWAT parameter Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:35:55 -0600 Message-Id: <20241113143557.1000843-2-kshk@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241113143557.1000843-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> References: <20241113143557.1000843-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: FFpnAEJqpDPd-bdzs4NOGtmiuXCsMSZz X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: FFpnAEJqpDPd-bdzs4NOGtmiuXCsMSZz X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-15_01,2024-10-11_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2411130124 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" This happens on 64-bit big-endian machines. SO_RCVLOWAT requires an int parameter. However, instead of int, the test uses unsigned long in one place and size_t in another. Both are 8 bytes long on 64-bit machines. The kernel, having received the 8 bytes, doesn't test for the exact size of the parameter, it only cares that it's >=3D sizeof(int), and casts the 4 lower-addressed bytes to an int, which, on a big-endian machine, contains 0. 0 doesn't trigger an error, SO_RCVLOWAT returns with success and the socket stays with the default SO_RCVLOWAT =3D = 1, which results in vsock_test failures, while vsock_perf doesn't even notice that it's failed to change it. Fixes: b1346338fbae ("vsock_test: POLLIN + SO_RCVLOWAT test") Fixes: 542e893fbadc ("vsock/test: two tests to check credit update logic") Fixes: 8abbffd27ced ("test/vsock: vsock_perf utility") Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella --- tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 6 +++--- tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_p= erf.c index 4e8578f815e0..22633c2848cc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static float get_gbps(unsigned long bits, time_t ns_del= ta) ((float)ns_delta / NSEC_PER_SEC); } =20 -static void run_receiver(unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes) +static void run_receiver(int rcvlowat_bytes) { unsigned int read_cnt; time_t rx_begin_ns; @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void run_receiver(unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes) printf("Listen port %u\n", port); printf("RX buffer %lu bytes\n", buf_size_bytes); printf("vsock buffer %lu bytes\n", vsock_buf_bytes); - printf("SO_RCVLOWAT %lu bytes\n", rcvlowat_bytes); + printf("SO_RCVLOWAT %d bytes\n", rcvlowat_bytes); =20 fd =3D socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0); =20 @@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static long strtolx(const char *arg) int main(int argc, char **argv) { unsigned long to_send_bytes =3D DEFAULT_TO_SEND_BYTES; - unsigned long rcvlowat_bytes =3D DEFAULT_RCVLOWAT_BYTES; + int rcvlowat_bytes =3D DEFAULT_RCVLOWAT_BYTES; int peer_cid =3D -1; bool sender =3D false; =20 diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_t= est.c index 8d38dbf8f41f..7fd25b814b4b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c @@ -835,7 +835,7 @@ static void test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_server(const stru= ct test_opts *opts) =20 static void test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_client(const struct test_opts *opts) { - unsigned long lowat_val =3D RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE; + int lowat_val =3D RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE; char buf[RCVLOWAT_BUF_SIZE]; struct pollfd fds; short poll_flags; @@ -1357,7 +1357,7 @@ static void test_stream_rcvlowat_def_cred_upd_client(= const struct test_opts *opt static void test_stream_credit_update_test(const struct test_opts *opts, bool low_rx_bytes_test) { - size_t recv_buf_size; + int recv_buf_size; struct pollfd fds; size_t buf_size; void *buf; --=20 2.34.1