From nobody Sun Nov 24 04:34:19 2024 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65832D531; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731028671; cv=none; b=gnDfXFVUUtLmE6uCHX45Or53nAW0CisVQHrOQM+2lz2ZVET7cb9x9ISoceQamd1TQt8RfGWFSOYEfgTR25W141a/N3j9AprKKnw1ZXk8VyPJVJT1mT/zEBEoYTJiy2vYHKwliFqreq+ozngmVuFEmznB4+IX9pDK1Pix2l5SxCk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731028671; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hOxVmJ53X3YR5UOFU234STWQkX0/JjGCx/dsc5V5o8c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=byTm+2nLf4s9oxoT3XPMQ6Ya3HQ8UdROH3aKhpTw+rHBQ+sCn5CMdxc4ISyF/saZpvm2+bRK9TOdu3dAeqSW5XINwSH0z5omjRrXLCwQiaa1opi3Z3XqCO9NDVjei2LX3HoIGYjeVrOjOh+ks9HWuHXmotRdx8E8oA1+9geAuk4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=e36AUQRT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.158.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="e36AUQRT" Received: from pps.filterd (m0356516.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4A80ASex018660; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:45 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=WApdznn9Qgh/dnUAp jLmPtZCgX1HHXkTpRsJ/9wm8I4=; b=e36AUQRTJoDbivCYT7V3cBhyJfoq+q7vO YPIBarbVIf6kvWTTp8vQIQoSaNT1gq61LyrUoTjtbX2e+iPk6Lc06f9LIegqf7dS GWFxQtYxzdHSAW3OdJyijAZPEUuhVsxgEgiwP6lwlvhExJ5uQnhT+tScDH2TwKuA 77MqJkkiJQNTlw6Yq6Gx3zk+XP5ev7uwEF5BAQAyJiAt5j/uxX8Yl3fkhToFb0bR wHk5m5trg9xwigRZEEbZvJtowM+yEjEqeb0ErjB0gygg2OH8qxO8lR9tyS5pg1La 3W/L4X7m6+bb6dMaFqFbqVseToVWFhd4OtNhgsoJi6S9b4p1FThPQ== Received: from ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (dc.9e.1632.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [50.22.158.220]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42s7v0g6rt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Nov 2024 01:17:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 4A7M55gb024117; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:44 GMT Received: from smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.74]) by ppma12.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 42nxds9ag0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Nov 2024 01:17:44 +0000 Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [10.39.53.233]) by smtprelay07.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 4A81Hg0G40435970 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:42 GMT Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C428558054; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544FB5803F; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from WIN-DU0DFC9G5VV.ibm.com (unknown [9.61.252.11]) by smtpav06.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 01:17:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Konstantin Shkolnyy To: sgarzare@redhat.com Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, Konstantin Shkolnyy Subject: [PATCH v5 2/3] vsock/test: fix parameter types in SO_VM_SOCKETS_* calls Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 19:17:25 -0600 Message-Id: <20241108011726.213948-3-kshk@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20241108011726.213948-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> References: <20241108011726.213948-1-kshk@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: 4aTvG77ceNLBxfj64YWqETbuDeFMA0XA X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: 4aTvG77ceNLBxfj64YWqETbuDeFMA0XA X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1051,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.62.30 definitions=2024-10-15_01,2024-10-11_01,2024-09-30_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2409260000 definitions=main-2411080007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Change parameters of SO_VM_SOCKETS_* to unsigned long long as documented in the vm_sockets.h, because the corresponding kernel code requires them to be at least 64-bit, no matter what architecture. Otherwise they are too small on 32-bit machines. Fixes: 5c338112e48a ("test/vsock: rework message bounds test") Fixes: 685a21c314a8 ("test/vsock: add big message test") Fixes: 542e893fbadc ("vsock/test: two tests to check credit update logic") Fixes: 8abbffd27ced ("test/vsock: vsock_perf utility") Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shkolnyy Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella --- tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c | 4 ++-- tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_p= erf.c index 22633c2848cc..8e0a6c0770d3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_perf.c @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ =20 static unsigned int port =3D DEFAULT_PORT; static unsigned long buf_size_bytes =3D DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE_BYTES; -static unsigned long vsock_buf_bytes =3D DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES; +static unsigned long long vsock_buf_bytes =3D DEFAULT_VSOCK_BUF_BYTES; static bool zerocopy; =20 static void error(const char *s) @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void run_receiver(int rcvlowat_bytes) printf("Run as receiver\n"); printf("Listen port %u\n", port); printf("RX buffer %lu bytes\n", buf_size_bytes); - printf("vsock buffer %lu bytes\n", vsock_buf_bytes); + printf("vsock buffer %llu bytes\n", vsock_buf_bytes); printf("SO_RCVLOWAT %d bytes\n", rcvlowat_bytes); =20 fd =3D socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0); diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_t= est.c index 7fd25b814b4b..c7af23332e57 100644 --- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_client(const stru= ct test_opts *opts) =20 static void test_seqpacket_msg_bounds_server(const struct test_opts *opts) { - unsigned long sock_buf_size; + unsigned long long sock_buf_size; unsigned long remote_hash; unsigned long curr_hash; int fd; @@ -634,7 +634,8 @@ static void test_seqpacket_timeout_server(const struct = test_opts *opts) =20 static void test_seqpacket_bigmsg_client(const struct test_opts *opts) { - unsigned long sock_buf_size; + unsigned long long sock_buf_size; + size_t buf_size; socklen_t len; void *data; int fd; @@ -655,13 +656,20 @@ static void test_seqpacket_bigmsg_client(const struct= test_opts *opts) =20 sock_buf_size++; =20 - data =3D malloc(sock_buf_size); + /* size_t can be < unsigned long long */ + buf_size =3D (size_t) sock_buf_size; + if (buf_size !=3D sock_buf_size) { + fprintf(stderr, "Returned BUFFER_SIZE too large\n"); + exit(EXIT_FAILURE); + } + + data =3D malloc(buf_size); if (!data) { perror("malloc"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } =20 - send_buf(fd, data, sock_buf_size, 0, -EMSGSIZE); + send_buf(fd, data, buf_size, 0, -EMSGSIZE); =20 control_writeln("CLISENT"); =20 @@ -1360,6 +1368,7 @@ static void test_stream_credit_update_test(const stru= ct test_opts *opts, int recv_buf_size; struct pollfd fds; size_t buf_size; + unsigned long long sock_buf_size; void *buf; int fd; =20 @@ -1371,8 +1380,11 @@ static void test_stream_credit_update_test(const str= uct test_opts *opts, =20 buf_size =3D RCVLOWAT_CREDIT_UPD_BUF_SIZE; =20 + /* size_t can be < unsigned long long */ + sock_buf_size =3D buf_size; + if (setsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE, - &buf_size, sizeof(buf_size))) { + &sock_buf_size, sizeof(sock_buf_size))) { perror("setsockopt(SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE)"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } --=20 2.34.1