From nobody Sun Nov 24 04:44:13 2024 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CDDF217650; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 16:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730996030; cv=none; b=i8tc39vrEHOIQfmuaHVMVUQIJNmfsfSAoBh4BxJobI6F19QQsWllhomIAiRAk7F26FgmYe/a18knfGRU9VhLo45vz4hRLW8KAyPmW8vO5zhx/mW6+ibt2A8SDIkZUJJ/4UVX+I1B471EC3v3tFUBzneO/tpmWLJVSFUz2saozRM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730996030; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4IC24vmZl6WDvgMu457OvjBdl317Y6deaK2gkmSPzBk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=Ld74aP/yUIhBPpW6aOSDCgi6EKIIuRp7KrgFcDU+vQ2GBY5cpZ14IAFcvvbUAb6nIkQnT3njTNa/zzTv5mtCq1d9Dh4U3BKg7l7MvkUK/utRmN8M6RVyKqGLsUOGomzulnFuNlH4yJvuAFd2hilMogEDXuGJJukhOpRC8gWPBnY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hIIEBd86; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hIIEBd86" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730996028; x=1762532028; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4IC24vmZl6WDvgMu457OvjBdl317Y6deaK2gkmSPzBk=; b=hIIEBd86mvgDYBts8Lx2WzNsG0oHYkALaKVFWGanFeo8TwHlJrdIAsXV j3uzwlsciZaQj1wzXeDiiODli0KSedc/iwjJ4MXAkXApscCZXegcdCQo9 lRtQcIx3mObEXwZjHnlWWsQiNmlhvoTiaLhu9ImHzvv502ow/Lq+lpuU6 /R0H3EQudSA1YCpUmrkca61Nf0/6P/YypXxSkyryewsrX6W8obOMrBXgm NLxchf3kNIKpX5Uds4RJBVKX7GXAzWXFEqdk01Lh9X1tNkU0nnOoAR2i3 L6Ik4CsenCF1dDun8Q+h9LXXP32F7ubVilPPZDMABWUxmKfkR71gBzaST A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: tkTQiD4yTSyKXMbASqQBiw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9JGz6hz6TxK9Edt7YMXO+g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="41955690" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="41955690" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2024 08:13:48 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ISf04XLKSruvBqVGFSYWCg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 71ITT835QxO0RrQpnn6sIA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,135,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="90258135" Received: from newjersey.igk.intel.com ([10.102.20.203]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Nov 2024 08:13:45 -0800 From: Alexander Lobakin To: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni Cc: Alexander Lobakin , =?UTF-8?q?Toke=20H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , John Fastabend , Andrii Nakryiko , Maciej Fijalkowski , Stanislav Fomichev , Magnus Karlsson , nex.sw.ncis.osdt.itp.upstreaming@intel.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net-next v4 01/19] jump_label: export static_key_slow_{inc,dec}_cpuslocked() Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 17:10:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20241107161026.2903044-2-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.0 In-Reply-To: <20241107161026.2903044-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> References: <20241107161026.2903044-1-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sometimes, there's a need to modify a lot of static keys or modify the same key multiple times in a loop. In that case, it seems more optimal to lock cpu_read_lock once and then call _cpuslocked() variants. The enable/disable functions are already exported, the refcounted counterparts however are not. Fix that to allow modules to save some cycles. Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin --- kernel/jump_label.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/jump_label.c b/kernel/jump_label.c index 93a822d3c468..1034c0348995 100644 --- a/kernel/jump_label.c +++ b/kernel/jump_label.c @@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ bool static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked(struct static_key *= key) } return true; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_inc_cpuslocked); =20 bool static_key_slow_inc(struct static_key *key) { @@ -342,6 +343,7 @@ void static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(struct static_key *= key) STATIC_KEY_CHECK_USE(key); __static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked(key); } +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(static_key_slow_dec_cpuslocked); =20 void __static_key_slow_dec_deferred(struct static_key *key, struct delayed_work *work, --=20 2.47.0